1 / 15

WISE Distributed System

WISE Distributed System. SADL K.U. Leuven Geo Solutions NV. Koen Mertens Jan De Belder Rombout Verwimp. Overall agenda. Part 1: WISE ds theory Part 2: Get it real! + demo Part 3: Results + discussion Part 4: Potential use WISE-ESTAT case + demo. Agenda Part 3. Results pilot

stanleymoseley
Télécharger la présentation

WISE Distributed System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WISEDistributedSystem SADL K.U. Leuven Geo Solutions NV Koen Mertens Jan De Belder Rombout Verwimp

  2. Overall agenda • Part 1: WISE ds theory • Part 2: Get it real! + demo • Part 3: Results + discussion • Part 4: Potential use WISE-ESTAT case + demo

  3. Agenda Part 3 • Results pilot • Recommendations • Further development • Implementation/organisation

  4. Results • Overall: scope was reached: automated validation flow for ART8 realised in experimental setup • Generic & extensible framework based on web services & standards (XML,WFS) • Generic: all testing generated from the XML files with automatic procedures • Extensible: functionality of web services is adaptable to new IT environments provided that the new custom code is added to the web service • Framework: logical grouping of use cases in Web Service logic

  5. Results FTP scenario • FTP scenario: for the test files provided by EEA (reportnet) & member states (FTP reporting exercise) • Only 34 of 131 tested XML files pass validation • 29 files fail spatial validation (outside MS) • 18 fail content validation (url) • 55 fail schema validation • Reason for not putting the FTP solution live • Schema validation errors could be avoided on input side ? (client tool for MS)

  6. Results WFS scenario • Working prototype • If WFS backend database has correct schema, output from WFS always validates against the WISE ds schemas • Currently Problems may occur with large updates due to verbose nature of output GML • Queuing mechanism should be refined

  7. Results WFS scenario • WFS scenario was not tested with MS • Complex features solution took long too implement • Solution not straightforward to roll out to MS • Involves installation of • Postgresql/postgis database according to specific db schema • Apache Tomcat web application server • Deegree-wfs configured to serve complex features on top of postgis • Follow up could include this test

  8. Further Development • Controllers • manageability of Biztalk flow • Unexpected errors get caught in Biztalk, but no always straightforward to debug from Biztalk administrator • Communication • More intelligent email alerting to administrators • More intelligent email alerting to member states on validation reports

  9. Further development • Schemas • Determine the cause of validation failure in xml files • Spatial validation failure • Content validation failure • XML schema issues • XML content issues

  10. Further development • WFS • Explore possibilities to serve complex WFS in different software environment • Now: tomcat5.5 + deegree-wfs + postgres/postgis • Possibly: ARCGIS server, Mapserver, ...

  11. Further Development • Security • Secure the services & system • Password policy • Enhance message queuing • Performance • Queuing of high amount of simultaneous calls

  12. Further development • Decisions steps • Consolidate pilot for production • Extend pilot to complex datasets • Detailed architecture (development level) based on the test results • Implementation procedure/road book to implement other services • Define out flow use cases

  13. Further organisation • Dedicated team of experts • Thematic expertise (subject of water management, legal obligations…) • Technical expertise (XML, development…) • Technical team • Account manager • DBA • 1 or 2 developers

  14. Further organisation • Active campaign to visit member states • EU Helpdesk for member states • Roadmap • Detailed Technical guidance • How to tutorial

  15. Thank you! • We stay available for: • Questions/discussions

More Related