Hidden Advertising in Latvian media

1. Hidden Advertising in Latvian media

2. Lesson overview Advertisers’ interests Public’s interests Media’s interests Ethics and Law Is hidden advertising corruption? Indications of hidden advertising Latvian cases Discussion

3. Advertiser’s interests Advertising - major source of financing for media companies (other main sources: sales of newspapers, subscription fee, state support) Advertisers use media to present goods and services in a positive light Advertisers pay media that deliver the right kind of audience for their advertisement. Advertisers like media that focus on information that could increase their sales (bad drinking water – mineral water, problems in state hospitals – private hospitals, pollution – cars?)

4. Advertiser’s interests Advertisers want to get the best effect - difference in putting the ad as an island, in the beginning, middle or end of a block of ads - be exclusive, be frequent and be regular Advertisers dream of being invited to TV and radio programs as competent guests, to be able to address a wider audience without having the “ad tag” Advertisers can never pay for hidden advertising to media that does not want to have money for hidden advertising

5. Public’s interests The public want to trust the information from the media companies If the public can trust, they must believe that editorial-journalistic material is made in an independent and unbiased manner The public must thus know when they read/watch/listen to editorial/journalistic information and when they read/watch/listen to ads

6. Public’s interests If the public don’t feel the division or firewall between journalism and advertising they will loose trust in information from media companies, possibly stop to buy it A public that doesn’t know what is ads and what is journalistic material does not have the preconditions for making up their minds and making decision in an independent manner If the public can not make independent decision, a democracy can not function

7. Media interests Media can serve the advertisers or serve the public Media’s role is primarily to serve the public Media is supposed to divide advertising and news material and not masquerade advertising as news In serving the public and making honest and impartial news media makes all decisions on the program or story themselves, including whom to interview, topic selection, research, script writing and final editing without influence from anybody from outside

8. Key question Whose pressure is the strongest? the pressure from the advertisers? the pressure from the public? the pressure from the media?

9. Open and Hidden Advertising Open advertising is information about commercial goods and services, people, politicians and others that is placed in a newspaper, internet portal, radio or TV program and is clearly divided from journalistic information visually and or by sound and that is paid for officially. Hidden advertising is to positivelyor negatively report about commercial goods and services, people, politicians and others against pay or other agreement and not as a result of a journalistic evaluation

10. Effects of hidden advertising

11. Key questions Will the public be wise and educated enough to detect hidden advertising? Will media be ethical and strong enough to resist temptations of possible short-term financial profits?

12. Media Ethics and Latvian Laws Code of ethics Law on Advertising Law on Radio and TV

13. Code of Ethics Not make advertising as story Not give signals to advertisers and sponsors that they can get a favorable story about themselves if they provide a big ad or sponsor a program Not take orders from people outside the editorial staff Not mention events that carry sponsor’s name Not wear sponsored clothes or cars Not accept any other advantages from possible advertisers or sponsors

14. Code of Ethics Not accept pay or any other benefits for interviewing people Not use directly and uncritically PR material Freelancers must inform about incomes for programs that they make Not use false news and photos to make negative stories about competitors Not keep quiet about matters subject to critical comments because of pressure from advertisers and sponsors Not show only one side of a story due to pressure from advertisers or sponsors

15. Latvian Law on Advertising The distributer of the advertisement must divide the advertisement from other forms of information

16. Latvian Law on Radio and TV Advertising and TV shop can not exceed 20 % of the total broadcasting time per day. The advertising time can not exceed 15 % of the total broadcasting time per day The broadcasting time for advertising and TV shop can not exceed 20 % (12 minutes) per hour. In programs defined as National Order program the percentage can not exceed 10 (6 minutes) Hidden advertising and hidden TV shop is illegal Except for self-advertising it is not legal in advertising and TV shop to use the image and voice material of persons that on a regular basis head the news report or other programs focusing on current problems in the society

17. Latvian Law on Radio and TV If a program is sponsored, this has to clearly shown at the start or in the end of the program by giving the name of the sponsor and the company’s logo The sponsor can not influence the content and the choice of time of distribution of the sponsored program and thus limiting the broadcasting organization’s editorial independence In the sponsored program it is not allowed to advertise products or services of the sponsorer including direct or invitational signs regarding the purchase or rent of the product or service It is prohibited to sponsor news (except for narrow tematic news) (!) or programs focusing on current problems in the society

18. Is hidden advertising corruption? Medical corruption – we pay one official sum to get treatment, pay another sum unofficially to avoid lines and get a better treatment Construction corruption – companies pay one official sum to take part in a construction competition, pay another sum unofficially to win the competition Media corruption – advertisers pay one sum officially for ads, another sum unofficially for hidden advertising to get better sales

19. Indicators of hidden advertising It does not have to be hidden advertising, could also be poor journalism, the more systematic the more suspicious

20. Indicators of hidden advertising A) the material is one-sided or uncritical In the interview there are only pleasant questions or only unpleasant questions, the attitude of the journalist is seen, shaking his head, moving his head etc. In the material there is very often refered to unofficial information, to unanimous sources Very often emotional words are used in the program/story, positive or negative, praising or slaughtering

21. Indicators of hidden advertising A) the material is one-sided or uncritical There is information only about what one part of the story or program thinks There is an invitation to support or not to support somebody or something, or to buy or not to buy something

22. Indicators of hidden advertising B) The material shows up without a clear, obvious reason other than to popularize or slander a person or a product, here the wordobvious refers to the context, what does the media usually make stories about for the informed reader, spectator, listener, based on what people generally would understand is current and important A person, party or company is very often reflected or portrayed in a very positive or negative way, huge coverage for events of giving There is much information about a person’s life that is not connected to his professional job

23. Indicators of hidden advertising PR material is used in the program Advertising visually and in other respect copies or looks like a normal journalistic story/program and is not clearly presented as advertising Advertising for a company or party appear visually or in other ways in the background when a report is made A person is reguarly invited to give expert comments in his field of operations when there are other well-qualified experts on the market, as well – bank directors, politicians

24. Indicators of hidden advertising C) Sponsoring of thematic news or current programs where a representative from the company or linked to the company sponsoring the program takes part or a person speaking positively about the company or something that could be in the interest of the company sponsoring the program takes part, examples beer company reps, bank reps, restaurant reps, local governments

25. Latvian cases Election cases Other cases

26. Pre-election monitoring 2001 Monitoring of the Latvian 12 national and regional newspapers as well as 4 national TV stations prior to the local elections Monitoring organized by the Soros Foundation and Delna (Transparency International Latvia) Press monitored from February 10 – March 10, 2001 TV stations monitored from February 28 – March 12 Final day of local elections: March 11

27. Pre-election monitoring 2001 Objective: To monitor the press or TV stations in the pre-election period in order to find out whether there is journalistic material that can be classified as hidden political advertising Journalists’ comments and editorials were not analyzed Found cases do not immediate imply that they are hidden political advertising, but they show that professional and ethical principals in journalism have been broken that again can be both a result of ‘buying the media’ and/or lack of professionalism.

28. TV monitoring 2001 TV monitoring of: Latvian State TV – Program 1 (LTV-1) Latvian State TV – Program 2 (LTV-2) Latvian Independent TV – (LNT) TV3 111 videotapes with all programs except for series and entertainment programs where politicians did not take part – totally approximately 20 000 minutes – monitored by Vidzeme students

29. TV monitoring 2001 Number of suspicious cases in TV stations

30. TV monitoring 2001 Number of suspicious cases in by TV programs

31. TV monitoring 2001 example LTV-2 “Biznesa ekonomika. Diskusija. Apskats. Smaids.” several interviews with candidates from LC and TB/LNNK, candidates from PCTVL and TP not invited at all simple and pleasant questions portrayal interviews superlatives used by leading journalist in describing the guests became more and more positive advertising in the program very much look like the material in the program

32. TV monitoring 2001 example LNT LNT Brokastis, Vēlēšanas gaidot, Viļņa Ruļļa sarunas, Egila Zariņa rīta mikslis, Balzams dvēselei, Egila Zariņa gardēžu klubs, Baibas Auzānes Mājas akadēmija often the politicians were not presented as persons that are candidates for the local elections overall easy and pleasant questions LNT Sunday news – Nedēļa refering to inofficial information, rumors, unanimous sources

33. TV monitoring 2001 Interviews with candidates in all TV stations by party

34. TV monitoring 2001 Interviews with candidates in all TV stations by politician

35. Press monitoring 2001 6 national newspapers: Lauku Avīze, Diena, NRA, Rīgas Balss, Час, Панорама Латвии 6 regional newspapers: Liesma, Rēzeknes Vēstis, Zemgales Ziņas, Zemgales Ziņas, Kurzemes Vārds, Ventas Balss, Миллион

36. Press monitoring 2001 232 suspicious cases found

37. Press monitoring 2001 62 % of cases in 3 Russian-language newspapers 24 % of cases in local newspapers

38. Press monitoring 2001 Suspicious cases in national newspapers

39. Press monitoring 2001 Suspicious cases in local newspapers

40. Press monitoring 2001 5 problems seen in 78 % of the stories with suspicious material

41. Press and TV monitoring 2001 Reactions Negative articles Positive articles Threats of court case

42. Media monitoring 2002 Project continued Press – monitoring of 56 newspapers for 60 days (August 5 – October 5, 2002) 17 national newspapers (dailies and weeklies) 39 regional/local newspapers

43. Media monitoring 2002 Project continued TV – monitoring of 5 TV stations LTV-1, LTV-2, LNT, TV3, TV5 Radio – monitoring of 8 radio stations LR1, LR2, LR4, SWH, SWH+, Radio Skonto, Mix FM, PIK Random analysis from August 5 – September 3 Analysis of all programs from September 6 – October 6

44. TV monitoring 2001- 2002 2001: period of analysis: 13 days 2002: period of analysis: 39 days

45. Press monitoring 2001- 2002 2001: period of analysis: 30 days 2001: 12 papers analyzed 2002: period of analysis: 60 days 2002: 56 papers analyzed

46. Radio monitoring 2002 Radio PIK: 100 out of 103 suspicious cases

47. Press monitoring 2002 Suspicious cases in national newspapers in Latvian

48. Press monitoring 2002 Overview of parties reflected in a positive way in national newspaper in Latvian

49. Press monitoring 2002 Overview of parties reflected in a negative way in national newspaper in Latvian

50. Press monitoring 2002 Suspicious cases in national newspapers in Russian