200 likes | 213 Vues
This report discusses the impacts of dual-polarization radar on quantitative precipitation estimation, covering topics such as data quality, hydrometeor classification, microphysics retrieval, and precipitation quantification. The report also aims to identify science issues related to quantitative precipitation estimation with polarimetric radar and facilitate the transfer from research to operations.
E N D
Dual-Polarization Quantitative Precipitation Estimation Group Discussion Report Edward A. Brandes National Center for Atmospheric Research
Dual-Polarization Radar Impacts: ● Data quality ● Hydrometeor classification ● Microphysics retrieval/understanding of precipitation processes ● Microphysics parameterization in numerical models ● Precipitation quantification
Group Discussion Objectives • Identify science issues related to quantitative precipitation estimation with polarimetric radar • Facilitate the transfer from research to operations
Discussion Topics ● Measurement accuracy/Calibration ● Drop axis ratios/DSD model ● Role of KDP ● Hail ● Estimator variable mix/functional form ● Algorithm testing and verification criteria ● Default algorithms ● New techniques/hardware
Polarimetric Variables • Radar Reflectivity: • Specific Differential Propagation Phase: • Differential Reflectivity: _______________ • Correlation Coefficient:
Measurement Accuracy Parameter Error Error in R Z 0.5 dB 10% ZDR 0.1−0.2 dB 5−25% KDP 0.2o km−1 5−100% Model Error Axis ratio ZDR error of 0.2−0.3 dB DSD form Algorithm Simulation or observations Canting angle
KDP Advantages ● Immune to calibration problems ● Unaffected by attenuation ● Unaffected by beam blockage ● Insensitive to dry tumbling hail
12 June 1997 Rainfall Accumulation 0600-1030 UTC R(Z ) R(K ) H DP 60 30 30 60 60 90 90 120 120 40 40 150 150 60 60 80 80 (a) (b)
KDP Potential problems ● Reflectivity gradients ● Differential backscatter phase shift ● Sensitivity to mismatched sidelobes ● DSD sensitivity ● High noise level in ΦDP measurements ● Reduced spatial resolution in rainfall estimates
Estimator variable mix/functional form • Enhanced Z−R Relations • Power-law/Polynomial Relations • Composite Algorithms • Drop-Size Distribution Retrieval
Florida-Tuned Power-Law Estimators(ZH and KDP in linear units, ZDR in dB) Empirical axis ratios: r = 0.9951 + 0.02510D – 0.03644D2 + 0.005303D3 – 0.0002492D4 Radar Reflectivity: Specific Differential Phase: Specific Diff. Phase/Diff. Reflectivity: Reflectivity/Diff. Reflectivity:
Summary Results:Tuned Power-Law EstimatorsEmpirical Axis Ratios(388 radar−gauge comparisons)
NSSL Composite Algorithm(linear units) R(Z) < 6 mm h−1 6 < R(Z) < 50 mm h−1 R(Z) > 50 mm h−1 Where:
Polarimetric Rainfall Estimation Point Estimates Areal Estimates
Drop-Size Distribution Retrieval with Polarimetric Radar Measurements Gamma drop size distribution: N(D)=N0Dμexp(-ΛD) N0 drop concentration parameter m distribution shape term L slope factor Solution:
Spatial Distribution of Retrieved DSD Parameters 17 September 1998 Convective rain: 192646 UTC Stratiform rain: 222154 UTC
Comparison: Physical ProcessesConstrained-Gamma and Marshall−Palmer DSD Models
Recommendations ● Endorse the NSSL composite algorithm as an initial product ● Update and enhance methods for radar calibration ● Conduct a community-wide inter- comparison study to improve algorithms