1 / 5

Understanding the Impact of Preprints on Academic Publishing

The landscape of academic publishing is evolving, particularly with the rise of preprints and e-prints. Platforms like arXiv have enabled researchers to share their findings prior to peer review, which can lead to greater visibility and rapid dissemination of knowledge. However, this shift presents challenges, such as variability in quality due to the lack of a formal peer review process. This article explores perspectives from publishers on preprints, highlights notable cases like Grisha Perelman's proof of the Poincaré Conjecture, and discusses the implications for research quality and access.

steven-castaneda
Télécharger la présentation

Understanding the Impact of Preprints on Academic Publishing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ”Publishing before/after real publication” What says the publishers? http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo.php arXiv.org (1991-) LANL/Cornell http://arxiv.org/ Subject specific preprint servers http://www.ams.org/global-preprints/ No peer-review = uneven quality… but also cutting edge Grisha Perelman The Poincaré Conjecture-Proved @ arXiv.org Preprints and e-prints

  2. http://arxiv.org/help/subscribe

More Related