1 / 20

CROP INSURANCE PROGRAMME OF GOI

CROP INSURANCE PROGRAMME OF GOI. Perspective of MNAIS - RAJENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Joint Secretary, Department of Agri. & Coop. Ministry of Agriculture, GOI. Risks affecting Agriculture production– A Major Challenge. Vagaries of weather - rainfall - temperature - humidity

stew
Télécharger la présentation

CROP INSURANCE PROGRAMME OF GOI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CROP INSURANCE PROGRAMMEOF GOI Perspective of MNAIS - RAJENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Joint Secretary, Department of Agri. & Coop. Ministry of Agriculture, GOI

  2. Risks affecting Agriculture production– A Major Challenge Vagaries of weather - rainfall - temperature - humidity - wind - cyclone - hailstorm Pest & diseases Fire Quality of inputs Soil Market prices

  3. Objectives of Crop Insurance To provide insurance coverage and financial support to the farmers in the event of prevented sowing & failure of any of the notified crop as a result of natural calamities, pests & diseases. To encourage the farmers to adopt progressive farming practices, high value in-puts and higher technology in Agriculture. To help stabilize farm incomes, particularly in disaster years.

  4. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF CROP INSURANCE IN INDIA • LIC introduced first scheme based on individual approach in 1972 for cotton in Gujarat, • Continued up to 1978-79 and covered 3110 farmers • premium of Rs. 4.54 lakhs and paid claims of Rs. 37.88 lakhs. • In 1979 Pilot Crop Insurance Scheme (PCIS) was introduced. • homogenous area approach limited to loanee farmers. • 13 States implemented till 1984-85,covering 6.27 lakh farmers • Premium of Rs. 196.95 lakhs and claims of Rs. 157.05 lakhs. • From Kharif 1985, Comprehensive Crop Insurance Scheme (CCIS) was introduced which continued till Kharif 1999. • The claims ratio was 1 : 5.72. • CCIS was criticized for limited coverage of farmers, crops and risks. • For covering farmer’s, yield and price, Farm Income Insurance Scheme (FIIS) was also Piloted during Rabi 2003-04 and Kharif 2004 seasons in selected districts

  5. Existing Crop Insurance Schemes NAIS: yield based; non-actuarial premium except horticultural crops / annual commercial crops; underwriting of losses by Central & State Govt. on 50:50 ratio WBCIS: weather based ; actuarial premium with premium subsidy shared equally by Central & State Govt. CPIS: plant based; actuarial premium MNAIS: yield based; actuarial premium with premium subsidy shared equally by Central & State Govt.

  6. NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL INSURANCE SCHEME (NAIS) • For improving the scope and content of CCIS a broad based NAIS was introduced from Rabi 1999-2000. • NAIS provides for greater coverage of farmers, crops and risk commitment. • Premia-structure has been rationalized and the scheme is required to operate at smaller unit area of insurance. • Subsidy to Small and Marginal farmers. • It is presently being implemented by 25 States & 2 Union Territories • In last 22 Crop Season: • Farmers Covered : 17.01 crore ( Av. not more than 15% farmers) • Premium Collected: Rs. 6213.41 crore • Claims Paid : Rs. 20437.21 crore • Claim ratio : 3.29 • Loss cost : 9.86%

  7. State-wise farmers benefited under NAIS(in lakhs)

  8. Performance of NAIS during XIth Plan

  9. Limitations of NAIS Large insurance unit area Delay in payment of claims due to late submission of yield data & availability of Govt. funds Pre-sowing/ planting Risk is not covered Unattractive basis of calculation of threshold yield, Low indemnity level, Localised calamities are not covered Post Harvest Losses are not covered Different seasonality discipline for loanee & non-loanee farmers Lack of competition

  10. Main Recommendations of JG Report • Actuarial premium regime with suitable subsidy • Reduction in insurance unit area to Gram Panchayat • Basis of calculation of threshold yield –best 5 of 7 years’ yield • Higher indemnity levels of 80% & 90% • Coverage of: • Pre-sowing & post-harvest losses • Perennial crops • Personal accident • Package insurance policies covering other assets of farmers, including Animal Husbandry • Private insurers to be encouraged, • Exemption from Income Tax & Service Tax so that an adequate Catastrophic Reserve Fund can be built

  11. Recommendations of other Committees • National Mission on Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA) recommended for the following in respect to crop insurance program: • Improvements in the existing NAIS w.r.t. calculation of threshold yield, reduction of insurance unit, on account payment of claims, etc. • Promotion of blended/mixed insurance scheme. • Comprehensive insurance products to address all the needs of different farming systems. • Design of Insurance products using weather index. • Weather Insurance products based on climate change. • Prime Minister’s Council on Trade & Industry- Sub-Committee on enhancing Agri Production & food Security has recommended toLink Agriculture credit with crop insurance to manage default risks

  12. Major Modifications in NAIS

  13. Major Modifications in NAIS …Cont.

  14. Subsidy & Net Premium for Farmers under MNAIS

  15. MNAIS- Present Status Implemented in 34 districts covering 22 Statesduring Rabi 2010-11 season The scheme would be on actuarial regime in which insurance company will receive premium on commercial basis and will be responsible for all claims GOI & State Govts. will provide premium subsidy upto a max. of 75% at different slabs of actuarial premium to make the scheme affordable for farmers The coverage in Pilot MNAIS is expected to 25% of total farmers of 50 districts.

  16. Area Yield Index and Weather Index: Advantage and Challenges

  17. Major Challenges in implementation of MNAIS • Assessment of crop yield at Gram Panchayat level – • Strengthening of Crop Cutting Experiments (CCEs) to increase their accuracy, reliability and timeliness; • Standardization of procedures and manuals (sample size, numbers, process etc.), • proper manpower allocation/outsourcing, capacity building/ training of field staffs, • supervision and monitoring of process, • real time reporting of CCEs -through SMS, internet etc., • computerization of yield data/reporting of CCEs result etc. • Alternative method for yield/loss assessment – • Use of remote sensing technology • Normalized Differential Vegetative Index • MoU was signed between DST and AIC for launching a Pilot project on Remote sensing technology in Bihar, Karnataka, Rajsthan & UP • No progress could be achieved due to transfer of concerned experts of DST • Methodology for yield assessment of multi-picking crops (horticultural & Commercial)

  18. Major Challenges in implementation of MNAIS ...cont • Adequate Automatic Weather Stations (AWSs) – for on-account payment • Existing -2000 AWSs (based on uniform distribution), • Required- 8000 AWSs • Fiscal Management- shifting of liability from financing post losses to pre-loses financing i.e. advance subsidy in premium • Product Designing- • risk classification (basis risk, Threshold Yield, Indemnity level), • appropriate weighting/calculation of basis risk (risk rating), • multi-optional products for the farmers based on their need/choice (pre-sowing, planting, post-harvest losses) • Benchmarking/registration before providing government support • Rationalization & Standardization of premium rates • Development of new products – for uncovered crops/areas

  19. Major Challenges in implementation of MNAIS …cont • Evaluation & Monitoring for proper implementation and further planning & Policy decision Grievance redressal mechanism • Publicity & awareness, • Coordination amongst all stakeholders • Clerical mistake

  20. THANKS

More Related