1 / 38

Inquiry-based undergraduate education at a large research university

Inquiry-based undergraduate education at a large research university. American University of Beirut Center for Teaching & Learning October 21, 2008. Patricia J. Pukkila , Professor of Biology & Director, Office for Undergraduate Research U. North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Acknowledgements.

stew
Télécharger la présentation

Inquiry-based undergraduate education at a large research university

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Inquiry-based undergraduate education at a large research university American University of Beirut Center for Teaching & Learning October 21, 2008 Patricia J. Pukkila, Professor of Biology & Director, Office for Undergraduate Research U. North Carolina at Chapel Hill

  2. Acknowledgements • Martha S. Arnold, Associate Director, Office for Undergraduate Research • David H. Kiel, Institute for the Arts and Humanities

  3. Plan for session • Choosing roles as educators • Resources for making changes

  4. Something about you • Above the line, write an adjective or brief phrase describing an “ideal” class that is going really well from your perspective • Below the line, write an adjective or brief phrase describing “the worst thing that could happen” from your perspective

  5. Your views

  6. Parker Palmer’s view: • Truth from authority? Classroom=dictatorship • Truth from opinion? Classroom = anarchy • Truth from inquiry? Classroom = community

  7. My view: All educators wish to witness the progression of students from novices to experts in our fields (or at least see a change from less “novice-like” to more “expert-like” behaviors…)

  8. Other considerations:- “Covering” material because of the curriculum and prerequisites- Mastery of useful information- Problem-solving- Effective communication - Cross-cultural understanding- Responsible citizenship

  9. Assumption: “covering material” is not sufficient for the novice to expert transition

  10. Imagine if we taught baseball the way we teach science • Until they were twelve, children would read about baseball technique and occasionally hear inspirational stories of the great baseball players • They would answer quizzes about baseball rules. • Conservative coaches would argue that we ought to make children learn and practice fundamental baseball skills, throwing the ball to second base twenty times in a row, followed by tagging first base seventy times. • Undergraduates might be allowed, under strict supervision, to reproduce famous historic baseball plays. • But only in graduate school would they, at last, actually get to play a game (Alison Gopnik, 1999 Small Wonders. New York Review of Books, May 6) (Adapted from Alison Gopnik, 1999 Small Wonders. New York Review of Books, May 6)

  11. Resources • Ask a colleague • Ask your students

  12. Elements Inquiry in a large class • Curiosity • Experimental design • Peer feedback

  13. Inquiry in a large class Elements Methods Student interests Simulators “Talk to the person next to you” • Curiosity • Experimental design • Peer feedback

  14. Curiosity • Diagram your concept of a gene • A deeper understanding of _____ is important to me because ______

  15. Experimental design Flower Breeder (dyann@schmidel.com)

  16. Since most feedback is from peers, instructors need to: • Teach students to value collaborative learning (give and receive “friendly amendments”) • Design the class so that student contributions are essential and valuable • shift instructor role from “authority” to “architect” • provide guides for necessary advance preparation by students, and trust them to embrace their roles • emphasize boundaries between known and unknown in discipline

  17. More resources • Collaborative design with graduate students • Classroom assessment techniques (“CATs”) • Get feedback on your experiences

  18. Recitations • Collaborative design • Instructor models graduate students, and graduate students model undergrads • Collaborative problem-solving, discussion, and presentation by undergrads

  19. Modes of Inquiry -Undergrads interview faculty -Undergrads host seminar -Faculty discuss “point of entry” and research accomplishments -Grads lead comparative discussions -1 credit, pass/fail, multidisciplinary

  20. Introduction to Research in Biology

  21. Classroom Assessment Techniques • Minute paper: What is the most important thing you learned today? • Muddiest point: What remains unclear to you? • Application card: Choose one idea you heard and suggest another application for it • One-sentence summary: Use one sentence to describe "Who does what to whom, when, where, how, and why?"

  22. GRC program • Faculty apply for funds to support a Graduate Research Consultant (GRC) to transform a “course project” into a research project • Undergrads work with “GRCs” who are paid for 30 hours/semester • Research design, methods, communication • Class time must be devoted to the products of student inquiry • GRCs coach and do not grade

  23. GRC program

  24. GRC Program, con’t.

  25. Student enrollment in GRC courses 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09*

  26. Still more resources • Centralized campus program for undergraduate research and inquiry • Undergraduate curriculum • Collaborations among universities • Professional societies • Publications

  27. www.unc.edu/depts/our

  28. QEP • Resources (>$500,000/yr) • Data • 4 Distinguished professorships in research and undergraduate education • Expansion of inquiry-based education and undergraduate research • “Carolina Research Scholar” transcript designation open to all students

  29. 16/16 have campus liaisons; 13/16 have centralized programs, website links

  30. Research in the CapitalAn Undergraduate Research symposium for the NC legislature • Purpose (importance of research in education; benefits to NC) • Preparation (see Blockus & Renoe’s “One-minute WOW”; enthusiasm + gratitude; clarity + relevance; what was known what has changed; peer instruction) • Publicity (letters, introduction in chambers by legislative hosts, office visits) • Publication (abstract books; Websites; CURQ) • Persistence (2001, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009...)

  31. 2008: part of Research Competitiveness request/ GA funding

  32. Professional Societies • America Society for Cell Biology • Genetics Society of America • Genetics Society of AustralAsia

  33. Genetics Education

  34. The spread of innovations “[The translators] make things more palatable for mainstream people. They see what the [innovators] are doing AND THEY TWEAK IT. They start doing it themselves, BUT THEY CHANGE IT A BIT. [Others] look at it and say, it’s a little off. But there’s a way I can change it and make it okay. Then [the innovation] takes off.” (DeeDee Gordon, quoted in The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell, p. 200).

  35. 10 Resources we discussed • Ask a colleague (PJP, for a start) • Ask your students (…is important to me because…) • Collaborative design with graduate students (facilitates collaborative learning; give and receive feedback) • Classroom assessment techniques -“CATs” (try one!) • Get peer feedback on your experiences (faculty recruit others to GRC program) • Centralized campus program for undergraduate research and inquiry (Office for Undergraduate Research) • Revision of Undergraduate curriculum (Quality Enhancement Plan) • Collaborations among universities (UNC 16-campus consortium; UNC-AUB!) • Professional societies (several) • Publications (Genetics Education)

  36. Next steps • Above the line, record an idea we’ve discussed that you might modify and implement • Below the line, record a potential barrier to implementing the change

  37. Conclusions • Inquiry-based approaches to course design are effective and enjoyable for research scientists • Gradual, incremental changes in roles as educators can be beneficial and substantial • Existing resources at every level are also opportunities to collaborate with others

More Related