1 / 15

Jaca: a Reflective Fault Injection Tool based on Patterns

Jaca: a Reflective Fault Injection Tool based on Patterns. Eliane Martins Cecilia Rubira Nelson Leme Institute of Computing State University of Campinas - Unicamp Brasil. International Performance and Dependability Symposium — IPDS’2002 Washington, D.C., USA • June 23 - 26, 2002. Contents.

stone-caldwell
Télécharger la présentation

Jaca: a Reflective Fault Injection Tool based on Patterns

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Jaca: a Reflective Fault Injection Tool based on Patterns Eliane Martins Cecilia Rubira Nelson Leme Institute of Computing State University of Campinas - Unicamp Brasil International Performance and Dependability Symposium — IPDS’2002 Washington, D.C., USA • June 23 - 26, 2002

  2. Contents • Context • Motivation and Objective • Jaca • Preliminary Experiments • Conclusions • Future Works

  3. Fault Injection • Deliberate introduction of faults into a system to observe its behavior • valuable approach to validate dependability properties • useful to evaluate impact of error recovery mechanisms into performance • Approaches: • simulation-based fault injection • hardware fault injection • software fault injection (SFI)

  4. SFI Approaches • Static injection (compile-time) • source or Assembler code alteration • no extra code is needed • faults triggered when • altered code is accessed • Dynamic injection (runtime) • special process • interrupt routines • trace mode • code insertion • needs extra code: fault injector • and monitor • needs fault trigger mechanism

  5. Motivation • Typical runtime SFI tools work at machine code level ex.: corruption of CPU registers • useful to emulate consequences of hardware failures • low intrusion into the target application • great effort to emulate software faults ex.: incorrect assignment of values to variables; incorrect array indexes; missing function • Why is it important to emulate software faults ? • software faults are major cause of system failures • COTS software components use is increasing, even for critical applications

  6. Our Goals • Problem: • Runtime injection at source-code level, affecting objects’ attributes and methods • Separation of concerns: fault injection and monitoring code separated from application code • Approach used: • computational reflection

  7. Computational Reflection • Capability of a system to reason about or act upon itself • Reflective systems manipulate • external data • meta information: data representing system’s aspects structural reflection manipulation of structural aspects ex.: definition of a class or function behavioral reflection manipulation of system’s behavior ex.: method invocation interception • Reflective systems’ • architecture: • base level: system’s functions • meta level: interception and/or • alteration functions

  8. A B Behavioral Reflection and OO object X : class attribute A : type, value method M1 : name, parameters metaobject meta-level base-level M1 object X M2 M3

  9. Jaca • Evolution of FIRE: • runtime fault injection tool for applications written in C++ • showed feasibility of the approach • source code dependency • Main requirements: • validation of Java applications • high portability • source code independence • ability to incorporate new fault models

  10. Development Aspects • Design based on the Fault Injection Pattern set: • reuse of architectural solutions already used to implement fault injection tools • Code is written in pure Java • Use of Javassist reflection library: • extends Java reflection API • requires no modification to the standard JVM • performs reflection at bytecode level during load time • modularity • extensibility • portability • source code • independence

  11. Log File Fault List Class List Jaca’s Architecture Interface Jaca Controller Injector Manager Monitor Manager Activator Logical Injector Logical Injector … … Logical Monitor Logical Monitor Meta Level Physical Injector Physical Monitor Target Application Base Level …

  12. Application’s Class Files Metaobjects’ ClassFiles Javassist library Metaobject Physical Injector Physical Monitor Application Instrumentation byte code byte code Activator (class loader) byte code + hooks to metaobjects

  13. Preliminary Experiments • Experiments to show Jaca’s extensibility: • Assembler-level fault injection • JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_LowLevelRoutine • (JNIEnv *param1, jobject param2) • { • int a, b, c, d, op, num ; • printf ( "\n###-> testing CPUID\n” ) ; • op = 1; • asm ( • "cpuid" • : "=a" (a), • "=b" (b), • "=c" (c), • "=d" (d) • : "a" (op)); • printf ( "\n###-> Register values: - EAX: %i, EBX: %i, • ECX: %i, EDX: %i\n\n", a, b, c, d ) ; • ... } Physical Injector Low Level Functions LowLevelRoutine( )

  14. Conclusions and Future Works • Jaca: • an extensible, portable software fault injector • faults affect attributes and methods of Java applications • fault injection uses computational reflection • source code independent but ... • dependent on reflection toolkit used • Further works: • validate real world applications • COTS ODBMS is being tested • extend Jaca’s functionalities • use of other reflection toolkits: Guaraná, Kava • explore Assembler-level fault injection features

  15. Thank you ! • Our emails: eliane@ic.unicamp.br cmrubira@ic.unicamp.br nleme@post.com

More Related