1 / 6

The Researchers Code of Practice: The responsibilities of the PI and the School.

The Researchers Code of Practice: The responsibilities of the PI and the School. . Simon Tett. Overview. Two kinds of distinct formal review meeting. Project review meetings or appraisals. Focus on progress towards specific research project goals Development review meetings

stu
Télécharger la présentation

The Researchers Code of Practice: The responsibilities of the PI and the School.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Researchers Code of Practice: The responsibilities of the PI and the School. Simon Tett

  2. Overview • Two kinds of distinct formal review meeting. • Project review meetings or appraisals. • Focus on progress towards specific research project goals • Development review meetings • Focus on career development of researcher. • Very important that these are separate meetings

  3. School Responsibilities • The School of Geosciences is responsible for: • promoting and encouraging PI good management practice. (which is why we’re having this meeting) • establishing and fostering a framework under which all staff are supported and managed.

  4. Responsibility of PI’s • Direction, and active management, of the research project • The project works • Actively supporting the career development of research staff • Development meetings normally held between PI and researcher • Can be held between researcher and someone else (nominated by research group head)

  5. Short term implementation plans • Roll out development review meetings • Clear demand from Research staff • Not currently happening • Aim is for all researchers to have one by 31st December 2009. • Induction packs to include Code of Practice

  6. Longer-term implementation plans • Focus on needs of early career stage researchers first.

More Related