150 likes | 280 Vues
NERF September 2012 Garden Waste Collection Service Paul Jones Head of Waste and Fleet Management. Presentation Outline. Background & context Service review & design Implementation Customer care challenges Initial performance Key results to date Conclusions & key issues. Background.
E N D
NERF September 2012 Garden Waste Collection Service Paul Jones Head of Waste and Fleet Management
Presentation Outline • Background & context • Service review & design • Implementation • Customer care challenges • Initial performance • Key results to date • Conclusions & key issues
Background • Local Government Review 2009 • Harmonisation of service standards & charges • Significant savings targets • Improve service performance • Discretionary services – self financing • PFI Contract implementation – HWRC upgrades
Service Review Diverse standards, charges and operations • Charges from free ‘opt out’ to £32/bin/year • Geographic coverage variable • Containers – 240 litre wheeled bins, biodegradable sacks, re-useable sacks • Service frequency & duration – fortnightly 12 months; fortnightly 9 months and then monthly, fortnightly 9 months then winter stop • Collection costs £400K, income £170K therefore - net cost = £230K • Free service – not an option!
Implementation • Fortnightly scheme 9 months – stop over winter • Use 240 wheeled bins, gradual phasing out of biobags and reuseable sacks • Charge of £20/bin/season – not limited per house • Maintain geographic coverage – extend if possible! • Phased implementation • SE & North - April 2009 • West - May/June 2009
Notification to service users Introduction of clear, cost effective and reliable payment arrangements Means of identifying ‘paid’ customers (bin stickers) Robust administration – front & back office – single central data source linked to LLPG Arrangements for recovery and delivery of bins Ability to check collection days – self service Improve geographic accessibility of service Ease of checking eligibility for service – as not provided countywide Customer care challenges
Initial Performance • Significant and sustained adverse media coverage • ~34% uptake in what had been a ‘free area’ • Overall users dropped from 24,000 to 15,000 • 60% paid by cheque in the first year (10,000) – no online facility • Delays in processing customer payments • Savings targets achieved - £270K - exceeded target by £23K • Reduction in collected green waste • Increase in HWRC inputs • No increase in residual tonnage • Marginal (0.27%) drop in overall household waste composting rate compared to previous year 12.17% in 2008/9 to 11.9% in 2009/10
Key Results to Date • Service uptake growing from 14,700 to 20,000 + • Coverage extended • Financially sustainable (and income continues to grow) • Modest charge increase • Transactional web & rewards • Customer satisfaction increased from initial 34% to current 60% - (the rest don’t like paying) • And……
Yields per bin increased from 390Kg to 506Kg • If you are paying you make sure you get your money’s worth!
Household Waste Composting Rate • Initial dip, followed by gradual increase in overall composting rate to current 13.5%
Total Household Waste • Total Household waste arisings falling • No increase in disposal of garden waste in general household bins
Conclusions & Key Issues • Actively manage PR • Administration arrangements must be robust • Customers expect a better service when paying directly for it! • Single database linked to LLPG • Encourage self-service payment – avoid cheques. • Crews must be able to readily identify paying customers • Collection, washing & storage arrangements for bins • Expect significant drop-off in % of users if stopping free service • Expect higher ‘yield’ per bin • Impact on routes/vehicles/staffing levels • Consider other policies – side waste, bulk collections • Provide customers with choices (1.2.3 leaflet) • Expect increase uptake at HWRCs and modest temporary impact on overall compost rate.
Thank you Paul Jones Head of Waste and Fleet Management