1 / 27

Digital VS. Film

Digital VS. Film. By: Paul Kim Roxy Marashi Demi Encina ICS 5 – Group 9. Pre-Consumption: What is camera film made out of?. Black & White Film: Cellulose Acetate base Emulsion containing silver halide salts/crystals bonded by gelatin Color Film:

studs
Télécharger la présentation

Digital VS. Film

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Digital VS. Film By: Paul Kim Roxy Marashi DemiEncina ICS 5 – Group 9

  2. Pre-Consumption:What is camera film made out of? • Black & White Film: • Cellulose Acetate base • Emulsion containing silver halide salts/crystals bonded by gelatin • Color Film: • The same thing + three compounds that change color when exposed to non-white light

  3. Pre-Consumption:What are digital images made out of? Pixels CCD chips

  4. Pre-Consumption:How are digital cameras made? In Micro Technology plants Dust particles and proper clothing Machinery – furnace tubes and washing machines Assembly process – CCD, metal plate, static free tape, stycast epoxy, camera body, probe, lens mount, green boards, card drives, interconnecting cables, cleaned and polished, packed and shipped.

  5. Pre-Consumption:WARNING!!! Toxic chemicals and gases Special plumbing

  6. Pre-Consumption:Film cameras are made up of… An optical element (the lens) A chemical element (the film) A mechanical element (the camera body itself)

  7. Pre-Consumption:Professor Interviews • Conclusions: • All professors own and prefer digital cameras, one professor still caries a film camera • All professors prefer digital cameras because they are cheaper and thought to be more environmentally friendly

  8. Pre-Consumption:M-Turk “couple time a year” “I’m always using it” “About ten times a year” “I usually take about 100 pictures a year” “Daily I take at least 10 pictures of my family members” “I use it at home and it is digital” “I use it all the time to take pictures of inside and outside happenings. My flower gardens, my dogs, my daughter. I use it all the time.” “do not take steps” “Be careful with the film, keep it enclosed, try to not use the camera a lot” “I have never taken any steps or even considered the chemical exposure from my traditional camera” “I open the film very carefully in dark place, I open slowly make sure no light enters” “I do recycle batteries, I usually pass it down to the kids to use, or resell. I don’t throw out my cameras.” “I no longer use film cameras” “Companies who producted them should recycle them” “Make sure they are disposed of in a proper way” “no”

  9. Pre-Consumption:M-Turk “Kodak, Kodak, Kodak” “Digital camera cost is the only reason, environmentally would have to be the digital, I like the traditional for the look but with practice you can do the same with digital” “Digital camera, digital camera, digital camera” “Canon A100 PowerShot, N/A, Canon 30D” “Digital camera, Digital camera, Traditional film camera” “Digital, Digital, Digital is fine” “Digital, Olympus, Olympus” “I choose digital for end cost of no film. I choose digital for no disposable parts. I choose digital for the editing qualities.” In Conclusion, many M-turk respondents preferred digital cameras instead of film in terms of cost effectiveness, environmental friendliness, and photographic quality. Many did not consider, look into, or seem to worry about taking steps to limit chemical exposure to the environment; they would just give it to photo developing shops and let them “worry” about it. More M-turk respondents had a higher camera usage rate than those with a lower camera usage rate.

  10. Consumption • The typical digital point-and-shoot camera roughly has a lifespan of 3-5 years and 15000 to 25000 shots depending on the rate of usage and utilization of the flash module. • SLR (single lens reflex), the typical professional-type cameras do last much longer given their more durable parts, but comes at a much higher price.

  11. Consumption: Old School • In the pre-digital age, consumers printed film pictures at electricity-gobbling photo labs that used huge amounts of water to rinse film and paper prints from silver halide and other chemicals used in printing pictures, causing extensive and unheard of levels of chemical runoff.

  12. Consumption: • Today, the photo lab of yesteryear has been reduced to an electronic box found at your local Target, Costco, and CVS, among other stores without the chemical penalties.

  13. Consumption:Storage • Flash storage (SD Card, MMC, CF) are the main storage devices in today’s popular consumer electronics such as cameras, camcorders, and cell phones. • Manufacturing costs continue to slide and now high-capacity storage flash chips can be bought for very cheap. >$10 • Of course, to view and store pictures digitally requires a computer which has additional environmental start-up costs similar to a digital camera, but our project is focusing more on the camera itself.

  14. Consumption: Ink: Environmental Harm? • The typical consumer spends $180 a year on ink. Much of that ink comes in plastic cartridges, copper contacts, and of course the paper packaging.

  15. Consumption:Tidbits of Ink Factoids • In 2006, Small and Medium Businesses spent about $3.5 billion on printers and $3 billion on supplies (ink, toner, paper) in the United States. • The energy industry devotes nearly 10% of its resources in producing and manufacturing paper, which most likely is fueled by coal-based power plants.

  16. Consumption:Professor Interviews Conclusions • All professors already gravitated for digital cameras for every purpose except for the rare instances in where film cameras are absolutely required. • The rate of printing at home is nearly nonexistent with the hassle of photo paper and ink.

  17. Consumption:M-Turk Nearly most of the M-Turk respondents during the Consumption section used digital cameras mainly for the course of work or action. The majority of respondents either never printed or took their prints to Target/Walgreens, with only a few printing at home Respondents agreed they threw batteries and ink in the trash, but claimed they had no better options

  18. Post-Consumption:Where can I get rid of it? • Disposal of non-digital/film cameras: • These cameras are not hazardous and may be safely disposed in the trash • Disposal of digital cameras • Since they contain dangerous chemicals these cameras must be properly disposed of • The disposal of digital cameras is more harmful to the environment than the disposal of film cameras

  19. Post-Consumption:Film Cameras • Film cameras actually do not have any chemicals or hazardous materials within itself • Waste that comes from using a film camera, occurs during the manufacturing and developing processes • The chemicals used during development have to be properly disposed of and cannot just be poured down the drain. • To do this, you can: • Dump the chemicals into a septic tank • Contact your local county waste disposal or recycling for disposal instructions

  20. Post-ConsumptionDigital Cameras • Since digital cameras contain hazardous materials in them, if they are not properly disposed of, it creates e-waste • E-waste is known to contain chemicals such as led, cadmium, mercury, and others that have known toxicological effects that range from brain damage to kidney disease to mutations, cancers • How can you get rid of your digital camera? • Sell – You can sell your old digital camera on craigslist or eBay • Donate – There are many different charities you can give it to including Kid Camera Project and Picture Tomorrow • Recycle – Some manufacturers provide a recycling service like Canon and Sony, others sponsor recycling events like Panasonic and Kodak • The Electronic Industries Alliance provides state-by-state listings of collection sites and offers guidance on other recycling options. http://www.eiae.org/

  21. Post-Consumption:Professor Interviews Conclusion: All of the professors care about where their electronic equipment ends up, and recycle them at the end of its usage life Half of the professors felt that an incentive would not change their behavior towards recycling, and half of them said that it would affect it.

  22. Post-Consumption:M-Turk Most of the M-Turk respondents thought that their e-waste ends up in domestic landfills. There were only a few who recycled their batteries or gave it away to proper disposal facilities. Most of them also said they would be more inclined to recycling their electronic equipment if their were a tax subsidy or some kind of monetary solution.

  23. Video Interview:Mark Poster and Brendan

  24. Conclusion And the winner for the most environmentally friendly camera is…. FILM!!!

  25. Chen, J. (2008). What to do with your old digital camera- reduce, reuse, recycle!. Zdnet. Retrieved on June 1, 2009, from http://blogs.zdnet.com/digitalcameras/?p=193 Photo.net (http://photo.net/film-and-processing-forum/00DhxM) (2009). Earth Day tip: Don’t trash that digital camera!.Consumer Reports. Retrieved on June 1, 2009, from http://blogs.consumerreports.org/electronics/2009/04/earth-day-tip-dont-trash-that-digital-camera.html Yahoo answers (http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080313031120AAEYcaT) Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photographic_film) eHow (http://www.ehow.com/facts_4895708_what-camera-film-made.html) photo.net (http://photo.net/equipment/digital/basics/) Henshall, J. (1999). How to make a professional digital camera. Epi-centre. Retrieved on June 1, 2009 from http://www.epi-centre.com/reports/dcs.html Hawkinsk, R. (2009). Environmental Footprint of Information Technology Much Higher than Expected, Researcher Finds. Science Daily. Retrieved on June 1, 2009, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090224133147.htm Harris, T. How Instant Film Works. How stuff works. Retrieved on June 1, 2009, from http://science.howstuffworks.com/instant-film.htm References

  26. More References! • No author. (July 2007). The True Cost of Printing. Processor Magazine. Retrieved on June 1, 2009 from http://www.processor.com/editorial/article.asp?article=articles%2Fp2929%2F32p29%2F32p29.asp • No author. (October 2007). Educational Signs to Encourage Double-sided Printing and Copying. Environmental Defense Fund. Retrieved on June 1, 2009 from http://www.edf.org/article.cfm?ContentID=3542 • Rowley, L. (March 2009). How to save in every room of your home (Blog). Money & Happiness. Retrieved on June 1, 2009 from http://www.moneyandhappiness.com/blog/?p=164 • Mearian, L. (June 2008). Flash memory prices continue to slide (Blog). Computer World. Retrieved on June 1, 2009 from http://blogs.computerworld.com/flash_memory_prices_continue_to_slide • Kerr, J. (November 2006). The Environmental Impact of Digital Photography. Marcel Gagne. Retrieved on June 1, 2009 from http://www.marcelgagne.com/node/433 • Adams, M. (February 2005). Digital cameras are good for the environment. Natural News. Retrieved on June 1, 2009 from http://www.naturalnews.com/001464.html • Carlsen, R. (April 2006). Estimated Camera Lifespan (Blog Post). Appraisers Forum.net Retrieved on June 1, 2009 from http://appraisersforum.com/showthread.php?t=104074

More Related