280 likes | 392 Vues
This presentation explores the key determinants driving change in healthcare, such as aging populations, technological advancements, and socioeconomic factors. By analyzing past predictions, like those of Lord Kelvin, we highlight common pitfalls in forecasting the future and stress the importance of preparing for various possible futures rather than predicting a single outcome. We discuss three potential scenarios for general practice—Titanium, Iron, and Wood worlds—each reflecting different technological and societal landscapes. Ultimately, we emphasize the need for ethical values, patient-centered care, and adaptability in the evolving healthcare landscape.
E N D
What next ? Emily Steedman, Kate Miller, Edwin Obazee & Gavin Kurkal
Overview • Key determinants of Change • Group Work • Presentation
Predictions of Lord Kelvin, president of the Royal Society, 1890-95 • "Radio has no future“ • "Heavier than air flying machines are impossible“ • "X rays will prove to be a hoax”
Looking to the future: common mistakes • Making predictions rather than attaching probabilities to possibilities • Thinking of only one future
Why bother with the future? • The point is not to predict the future but to prepare for it and to shape it
What I want to talk about • Drivers of change • Futures not the future • Possible futures for general practice • Visions of Primary Care 2015 • Conclusion
Some of the drivers of change • Ageing of society • Environment • Internet & Death of distance • Cost Effectiveness • Science and technology --particularly molecular biology and IT • Growing gap between rich and poor (Particularly Internationally)
Three possible futures: • Titanium • Information technology develops fast • Huge choice of technologies and information • Iron • overwhelmed by information • Experts are important • Wood • People react against technology (no mobile phones!) • Legislation restricts technological innovation http://resources.bmj.com
The GP in the titanium world • Patients shop around, collapse of “the list” • GPs compete with specialists • Patients “know” more than you do • Technology runs your life • Most consultations are e-consultations
The GP in the iron world • A trusted figure • Central to the community • Evidence based information • Tight management of GPs • Rationing of healthcare is accepted
The GP in the wood world • A local sage with a long beard • Central to the community • The GP almost alone has access to the internet and the information it contains • EBM is bunk
Patients value • A systematic review on patients' priorities for general practice care • examined 19 studies published between 1966 and 1995, • "humaneness," which ranked highest in 86% • "competence/accuracy" (64%), • "patients' involvement in decisions" (63%), • "time for care" (60%). Wensing M, Jung HP, Mainz J, Olesen F, Grol R. (1998)
Visions of Primary Care 2015 • Patient needs & values • Interpersonal Care • Relationship based care and continuity • Reducing Health inequalities • Healh promotion agenda Lakhani M, Baker M (2006)
Visions of Primary Care 2015 • First contact care & MDTs • Improved skill mix & intelligent booking systems • Integration & coordination of care • Services closer to home • More OOH care • GPs may be responsible for some patients in hospital
Simple steps for a 21st century health care system: Institute of Medicine
Simple steps for a 21st century health care system: Institute of Medicine
What will survive as the world changes completely: • Clear ethical values • Putting patients first • Listening • Accepting limitatons • Basing what we do on evidence • Leadership and teamwork • Learning
Conclusion • Now: doctors are natural scientists who apply their knowledge to solve patients’ problems • Future: doctor are change managers who help patients overcome or adapt to illness, come to terms with death, or change the lifestyles to stay healthy Change the whole model: Christian Koeck
References • Lakhani M, Baker M (2006): Visions of primary care in 2015. BMJ; 332:41-43 • http://resources.bmj.com • Koeck Christian (1998): Editorials: Improving quality for patients means changing the organisation. BMJ;317:1267-1268 • Wensing M, Jung HP, Mainz J, Olesen F, Grol R. (1998) A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. 1. Description of the research domain. Soc Sci Med;47: 1573-88.