200 likes | 283 Vues
Explore the concept of truth from religious, scientific, and sociological perspectives, and examine the consequences of lying under oath. Delve into Noble Cause Corruption and its effects on individuals and society. Gain insights into the Mark Fuhrman case in California v. Simpson.
E N D
CAREER SURVIVAL: Truth or Consequences 2008 In-Service Training
Training Objectives • Assess the nature of truth in three contexts: religious, scientific and social. • Identify the concept of Noble Cause Corruption. • List four possible consequences of lying under oath. • Appraise the consequences of Mark Fuhrman’s testimony in California v. Simpson.
The Greek Word for Truth Veritas This is the basis for our word VERDICT. www.forcounsel.com/products/1704.jpg
The Religious View • Identifies the truth with God’s testament to man. • God’s word is the eternal truth. • This truth is so, even if contradicted by science. • No other truth can or should exist.
The Scientific View • Critical of the divine view of truth. • All truths exist within the realm of empirical science and substance. • The truth must be tangible, repeatable and clinically testable.
The Sociological View • Does not negate the powerful word of God. • Allows for liberal interpretations of the truth. • A hybrid of the Religious and Scientific views.
The Religionist View • The “fall from grace theory.” • Everyone is born with the propensity to commit evil. • Lying is a manifestation of evil. • The propensity to lie increases in adulthood due to unsavory social demands. • Adults will lie to gain an advantage or to avoid pain.
The Sociological View • Lying is a learned behavior. • Lying is not genetically based. • Moral character is an acquired trait. • Lying is a product of deficient learning. • Lying can become seductive, compulsive and in some cases, addictive.
Lying in Policing • Collars for Dollars • Unnecessary witnesses • Skyrocketing overtime costs • Described as ‘Racketeering’
Lying in Policing (continued) • Lying to a suspect in interrogations • Double dipping • Undercover operations
Noble Cause Corruption • Using unethical means to catch criminals. • They believe it is right to do so. • Utilitarian viewpoint: the greatest good. • The ends justify the means.
Justify the Means The Ends
Consequences • Damage to reputation • Professional • Personal • Agency • Loss of cases • Instant case • All pending cases • Cases previously adjudicated
Consequences Loss of employment Difficulty in finding employment Criminal proceedings Fines Jail
Training Objectives • Assess the nature of truth in three contexts: religious, scientific and social. • Identify the concept of Noble Cause Corruption. • List four possible consequences of lying under oath. • Appraise the consequences of Mark Fuhrman’s testimony in California v. Simpson.
End of Presentation Click here to return to Training menu.