1 / 26

Particle Collider Phenomenology at the UW

Particle Collider Phenomenology at the UW. Directly Connected to:. Experiment : D0, ATLAS – Burnett, Lubatti, Watts Students : Haas, Gadfort Model Building : Ann Nelson, David Kaplan String Theory : Andreas Karch (see Matt’s part). Thy Faculty : Matt Strassler and Steve Ellis

sumitra-chetan
Télécharger la présentation

Particle Collider Phenomenology at the UW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Particle Collider Phenomenology at the UW Directly Connected to: Experiment: D0, ATLAS – Burnett, Lubatti, Watts Students: Haas, Gadfort Model Building: Ann Nelson, David Kaplan String Theory: Andreas Karch (see Matt’s part) Thy Faculty: Matt Strassler and Steve Ellis Thy Graduate Student: Matt Bowen REU Students: Kyle Armour (2004, now back as grad student), Andre Bach (2005) Coming Soon (free!): Chris Lee – INT PD, Jet Expert Wu-Ki Tung – Aff Fac, pdf & heavy flavor expert UW 8/18/05

  2. Goal: • Develop Analysis Tools for the LHC, especially looking for new physics • Practice on Tevatron Data Special Features at UW: • Focus on “Signal-driven” (model-informed but) , model-independent techniques • Engage faculty with a broad range of expertise • Meet weekly with the experimentalists (incl. video conferencing) Recent Theme - Asymmetries S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  3. Tools: • Computational: MadGraph, MadEvent • Event Simulation: PYTHIA • Detector Simulation: PGS Event elements: • Charged leptons: e,  () • Neutral Leptons:  (LSP)  MET • Jets (“clumps” of hadronic energy)≈ energetic partons (?) Many caveats – partons are color connected (# of jets  # of partons), depends on details of jet algorithm (work with Joey Huston), internal structure depends on higher orders (work with Bill Kilgore), and kinematics e.g., energetic W’s at the LHC  1 jet (not 2) energetic tops at the LHC  1 jet (not 3) See also Matt’s section S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  4. Example: Dark Towers not found by jet algorithms, ~ 5% effect S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  5. Distribution of (single) Jet Masses in LHC Olympics “ttbar” data sample W(Z) top S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  6. Number of (non-tagged) Jets per ttbar event S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  7. Tagging of Heavy Flavor Jets is Essential (typically from seeing decay lepton/displaced vertex) • But not so well understood experimentallyOR • Theoretically, gluon  b bbar in a gluon jet, What is that rate? Example Simulation (meant to be realistic) b-Tags: “real b” ~ 0.5 tanh(PT/36 GeV) [PT = jet PT] “real c” ~ 0.15 tanh(PT/42 GeV) mistag ~ 0.01 tanh(PT/80 GeV) S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  8. Asymmetries: • Tied to structure of valence quarks, Both quantum numbers, and Kinematics,  if see asymmetry in new physics, must be connected to valence quarks • Dynamics can both remember and forget the initial asymmetry, e.g., gluons forget flavor quantum numbers • Generalize from special cases! (Still looking for most general description) • EXAMPLES - S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  9. CP Invariance of the Tevatron • pp initial state at Tevatron is CP invariant, but not C or P invariant separately • Perturbative Final state is CP invariant, but may violate C or P • Depends on Perturbative Initial state: qg (asym)  gg (sym) • Depends on dynamics: LO s-channel gluon “forgets” asymmetry • Processes with W’s “remember” asymmetries Initial State P P Under C or P transformation P P Under CP P P S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  10. Looking for the t-channel Single top quark production at the Tevatron Jet & lepton correlated by kinematics and weak couplings Trigger on - • 1 lepton (only) • Missing Transverse Energy (from neutrino) • 1 b-tagged jet • 1 non b-tagged jet (from light quark) jet e+ b ne Similar for s-channel - extra jet from extra radiation! [ is too rare] often not seen S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  11. What else do we see? Need to be serious about Backgrounds! • , e.g., • , e.g., where b tag is fake, or extra q’s are b’s, or g becomes a heavy quark pair during showering/fragmentation S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  12. Lepton and Jet Correlated;CP Correlates t (e+) and tbar (e-) ! Sig Bkg S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  13. New Result (Sad) - Democracy of Background Wjj channels Tagging _ _ Small , Large tag rate  Large , Small tag rate S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  14. Wjj tag budget _ _ Democracy at work! But different channels have different shapes! S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  15. What does the LHC look like? Work by Matt Bowen • Initial state is P invariant, but not separately C or CP invariant • Cross-sections are P invariant, but can also be C invariant Initial State P P Under C or CP transformation P P Under P P P S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  16. Now Use Charge AsymmetryLife is Easier! • N+: Number of events with only 1 high pT (> 20 GeV) positively-charged lepton • N-: Number of events with only 1 high pT negatively-charged lepton • Δ: N+ - N- For 10 fb-1, double-tag  Dominated by single top, and statistics are fine S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  17. Top Asymmetry at Tevatron:Bowen, Ellis and Rainwater • Color flow asymmetry at Tevatron • In remember the color flow direction at NLO in QCD due to interference effects, t goes opposite to q (and p) if require extra jet (accelerate charge to get radiation)t goes parallel to q (and p) in inclusive sample (and jet veto sample) – virtual correction has opposite sign and is numerically larger • Asymmetry is communicated to leptons in decay  Very interesting physics, but statistics will be tough at the Tevatron, few percent S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  18. If asymmetries are so powerful, look at them in much more generality!  Matt • The literature: many applications of asymmetries scattered throughout, but no coherent study emphasizing their general importance. • A charge asymmetry, in any particular new-physics sample, unambiguously indicates this sample is generated from a process involving the valence quarks [other implications follow also, but more complicated to state] • This is a powerful constraint on models (many of which never have significant participation by the valence quarks) and ought to be a forefront model-independent tool at LHC. • Matt is looking for a high impact example to make this point to experimentalists! S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  19. Extra Detail Slides S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  20. Extra (Pseudo-)Scalar Bosons: Top-color models • Scalars (such as Higgs) exist as bound states of top and bottom quarks • For Mπ± = 250 GeV, tR-cR mixing of ~20% s-channel cross-section doubles • No interference as SM is from left-handed light quarks • t-channel contribution is suppressed by 1/Mπ±2 and that π± doesn’t couple to light quarks time-like momentum allows for resonance e.g., He & Yuan: hep-ph/9810367 S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  21. Extra Gauge Bosons: Top-flavor models SU(3)C x SU(2)h x SU(2)l x U(1)Y e.g., • Postulate a larger gauge group which reduces to the SM gauge group at low energies to explain top mass • 1st and 2nd gen quarks transform under SU(2)l, and 3rd under SU(2)h, add heavy doublet of quarks • SU(2)h gauge couplings mix with SU(2)l according to sin2φ • For MW‘ = 1 TeV, sin2φ =0.05 s-channel increases ~20% • t-channel contribution suppressed by 1/MW‘2 W' S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  22. Extra Dimensions:5-D Gauge Bosons • Allow only SM gauge bosons to propagate in compactified extra dimension • Permits Kaluza-Klein modes of W (Wkk) • For MWkk= 1TeV, s-channel amplitudes interfere destructively to reduce cross-section by 25% • t-channel contributions are suppressed by 1/MW'2 Wkk S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  23. Extra quark generations:CKM constraints • For 3 generations, the unitary of the CKM matrix constrains |Vts| < 0.043 • With >3 generations, one possibility is |Vtb|=0.83 and |Vts|=0.55 • Because gluons split to ss far more than bb, the t-channel cross-section rises by 60% • s-channel produces as many tops as before, but less with an additional b quark – so the observable cross-section goes down a little. • Changes decay structure of top s s Vts Without imposing 3 family unitarity, these are the 90% CL direct constraints. S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  24. Extra Couplings*:FCNC: Z-t-c • Can argue that low energy constraints (κZtc < 0.3) may not apply in the presence of additional new physics • For κZtc = 1, t-channel increases 60% • These couplings change top decay structure • κZtc recently constrained by LEP II data to be < ~ 0.5 (hep-ex/0404014) Z c c *there’s nothing “extra” about these couplings; the appropriate title would be “Modifications to Top Couplings” S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  25. Shifted cross-sections plot SM prediction 3σ theoretical deviation Charged top-pion FCNC Z-t-c vertex 4 gen Top-flavor model Extra dimensions Plot from hep-ph/0007298 t-channel CS has changed to 1.98pb ED from hep-ph/0207178 S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

  26. Lessons • t-channel is affected by modifications to top quark couplings • s-channel is affected by heavy particles • Many other models to consider, good practice for general searches Therefore, measuring the t- and s-channels separately is important and could potentially be a “Window to Physics Beyond the SM” S. D. Ellis - DoE Visit 2005

More Related