1 / 20

Build It Yourself or Buy It?

Build It Yourself or Buy It?. John Culshaw Professor and Associate Director for Administrative Services University of Colorado at Boulder. University Profile. 30,000 students Mid-sized ARL library (3.8m volumes, $9.63m resources budget) Innovative Interfaces ILS since 1994

summer
Télécharger la présentation

Build It Yourself or Buy It?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Build It Yourself or Buy It? John Culshaw Professor and Associate Director for Administrative Services University of Colorado at Boulder

  2. University Profile • 30,000 students • Mid-sized ARL library (3.8m volumes, $9.63m resources budget) • Innovative Interfaces ILS since 1994 • 54 librarians, 109 support staff

  3. ILS Platforms • Founding member of Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries • CARL’s Public Access Catalog (PAC) deployed in library since inception in 1984 • Migrated to INNOPAC in 1994 • Committed to Millennium platform in 1999 • Adopted Encore discovery layer in 2009.

  4. Other Critical Services • Digital Library: Luna Insight • Repository: Alliance Digital Repository (ADR)

  5. Why Buy It? • Functionality • Partnerships • Campus Environment • Finances and Staffing

  6. Functionality • Need for stable, consistent systems • Millennium continues to meet needs • Open source ILS platforms not fully fleshed out

  7. Partnership • Partnership works • Development partnerships • Strong user community

  8. Partnership: Encore Selection • Seamless integration with Millennium platform • Real-time circulation information • Single-sign on • Electronic resource data • Integration with Prospector

  9. Campus Environment • Campus also advocates buy-it approach • New SIS – PeopleSoft • Tested Sakai – kept WebCT • Need infrastructure improvements

  10. Finances and Staffing

  11. John Culshaw ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES # 001596651 FTE Rani Machoi Interim Libraries IT Dept. Director #159767 & 150002 1 FTE Rani Machoi IT Professional IV #107573 1 FTE Holley Long Digital InitiativesAsst. Professor #0065963 1 FTE Richard Losoff IT Professional I #00677399 1 FTE Michael Riberdy Media Specialist IV #00103357 1 FTE Mark Sondergard IT Professional I#104889 1 FTE John Dziadecki IT Technician II #100256 1 FTE Justin Van Voorst IT Professional I#106236 1 FTE Hans Schmidt IT Professional I #107258 1 FTE Tim Leal IT Technician II#107791 1 FTE

  12. University of Colorado Libraries Budget

  13. Staffing • Picture even more challenging when compared to AAU peers • Ratio of librarians to students • Ratio of library IT staff to students • Ratio of library IT staff to total staff

  14. “The support for community-driven software development in higher education is at a relatively young, fragile stage and needs to be embraced by a wider variety of institutions.” -- Robert McDonald

  15. Challenge? Dilemma? • Maintain existing service levels • Consider current budgeting and staffing models

  16. Our Strategy • Continue to buy • Maintain strong partner relationships with vendors • Monitor open source trends • Continually lobby for increased resources.

  17. Sources ARL Statistics 2006-2007. Washington DC: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2008. Fisher, Steve P. “Research Library Collaboration in Colorado – The Birth and Early Evolution of CARL, the Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries.” Collaborative Librarianship 1:3 (2009), 91-98. McDonald, Robert H. “Sustainable Communities for Software: Variations on a Theme.” EDUCAUSE Review 44:5 (September/October 2009), 6-7.

More Related