sutton
Uploaded by
16 SLIDES
306 VUES
160LIKES

Analyzing Startup Ecosystems Using Crunchbase: Insights from Competitive Data

DESCRIPTION

This analysis leverages Crunchbase, a comprehensive free database of technology companies, to explore the competitive landscape of location-focused startups. By employing a depth-first search methodology, we identified 1,945 unique competitors, culminating in a dataset of 1,505 companies. The research utilized hierarchical clustering on category tags to segment companies into six relevant categories. Key observations include funding patterns and media highlights on acquisitions, emphasizing Crunchbase as a foundation for understanding emerging trends in the startup ecosystem.

1 / 16

Télécharger la présentation

Analyzing Startup Ecosystems Using Crunchbase: Insights from Competitive Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

Playing audio...

  1. Deadpooled and Also-Rans What Crunchbase tells us about location companies

  2. Crunchbase • CrunchBase is the free database of technology companies, people, and investors that anyone can edit. • Open API: http://api.crunchbase.com/v/1/company/facebook.js • Yay, JSON!

  3. Methodology • DFS (depth first search) of competitors belonging to selected companies (Foursquare, Gowalla, Loopt, Brightkite, SimpleGeo, etc) • Generate list of competitors, repeat DFS search on list • Yielded 1945 unique companies • Resulted in 1505 companies with data

  4. Methodology • Initial attempt to segment on tags using hierarchical clustering. Tags were too unique, too sparse • Performed clustering using category tag • Reduced to 6 categories

  5. Higher in the plot occurs more frequently • Terms close to each other are more related

  6. Raw counts

  7. Percentages

  8. Adjusted IPO * Removed companies not location focused

  9. Acquiring Companies

  10. Media on Acquisitions

  11. Amount Raised for Web * Skewed by FaceBook, Twitter, Groupon, Aol

  12. Amount raised for Games

  13. Amount raised for mobile

  14. Parting thoughts • Crunchbase is a good starting point for data collection • Check SEC S-1 filings for IPOs • Scrape online for acquisitions (for amounts disclosed) • Verify which companies are still alive • Apologies for the teaser

  15. Sophia Parafina @spara http://github.com/spara

More Related