1 / 8

Estimatin g Ozone Production Efficiency from Space

Estimatin g Ozone Production Efficiency from Space. Matthew Cooper 1 , Randall Martin 1,2 , Bastien Sauvage 3 , Chris Boone 4 , Kaley Walker 4,5 ,Peter Bernath 4,6 , Chris McLinden 7 , Doug Degenstein 8 , Andreas Volz-Thomas 9 , Catherine Wespes 10

sveta
Télécharger la présentation

Estimatin g Ozone Production Efficiency from Space

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EstimatingOzone Production Efficiency from Space Matthew Cooper1, Randall Martin1,2, Bastien Sauvage3, Chris Boone4, Kaley Walker4,5,Peter Bernath4,6, Chris McLinden7, Doug Degenstein8, Andreas Volz-Thomas9, Catherine Wespes10 5th International GEOS-Chem Meeting Harvard University May 2, 2011

  2. Ozone Production Efficiency Convective outflow: No HNO3, some initial O3, NOx • OPE represents the nonlinear dependence of O3 on NOx • GEOS-Chem predicts high ozone production efficiency • This has not been confirmed by measurements in the tropical troposphere • We can estimate OPE using satellite retrievals of O3 and HNO3 concentrations

  3. Observations ACE-FTS • Solar occultation instrument measuring IR • Global coverage in tropics over several years (2004-2010) • Measures O3, HNO3, 30+ others • Evaluation against aircraft, ozonesondes [Cooper et al., JGR, in press] • 10-13% high bias for O3 • 15% for HNO3 Aircraft • PEM Tropics A (1996) and B (1999) • PRE-AVE (2004) and CR-AVE (2006) • Tropospheric O3 and HNO3 observations between 8-12 km used here

  4. Testing the Method using GEOS-Chem • How does calculating OPE from concentrations compare to direct calculation from production rates? • Assumed similar O3, HNO3 loss • Some HNO3 scavenging occurs, leads to OPE overestimation • OPE from concentrations is an upper limit estimate!

  5. Ozone Production Efficiency from ACE-FTS ACE-FTS (11.5 km) in Tropics (±20°) • OPE given by slope • OPE = 196 (+34, -61) mol/mol • Agrees with tropical mean OPE from GEOS-Chem (190 mol/mol) • First estimate of OPE using satellite data • Uncertainty sources • Slope error ± 8 • ACE bias ± 5 • Method (upper limit) -53 • Regional pollution ±33

  6. OPE from ACE-FTS, Aircraft and GEOS-Chem Tropics (±20° at 11.5 km) • Over South Pacific region: • GEOS-Chem agree with both data sets within uncertainties GEOS-Chem ACE-FTS Aircraft

  7. OPE Variability 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Ozone Production Efficiency (mol/mol)

  8. Summary • Estimation of Ozone Production Efficiency possible from ACE-FTS measurements • A new application for satellite measurements • Upper limit tropical mean OPE = 196 (+34,-61) mol/mol using ACE-FTS measurements • In agreement with values calculated from GEOS-Chem output • Regionally defined values possible from ACE-FTS– show same features seen in GEOS-Chem

More Related