70 likes | 195 Vues
This document outlines the goals of defining baseline scenarios for Information-Centric Networking (ICN) evaluation as established during IETF 89 in London. The aim is to create a common understanding and an agreed framework for scenario development, ensuring they are general and technology-agnostic. Feedback from implementers is sought to refine scenario details. Continuous updates have taken place since IETF 85, culminating in a collaborative effort to finalize scenarios, paving the way for their demonstration and integration into future RFC publication.
E N D
Information-centric Networking: Baseline Scenarios K. Pentikousis (Ed.), B. Ohlman, D. Corujo, G. Boggia,G. Tyson, E. Davies, A. Molinaro, and S. Eum IETF 89 London, England
Draft Goals • Establish a common understanding about a set of scenarios that can be used as a base for ICN evaluation • Provide equal ground for comparison, an agreed framework • Scenarios should be general enough and “technology agnostic”, although scenario detail may vary • Aim to get feedback from implementers, both on the scenario definition and level of detail • All approaches need not implement all scenarios • but all scenarios should end up illustrated in a real demo draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios
Draft Progress (10/2012-10/2013) • Introduced in IETF 85 • draft-pentikousis-icn-scenarios-00 • Extended for the Stockholm Interim • First discussion on ICN Evaluation Methodology • Updated for IETF 86 • draft-pentikousis-icn-scenarios-02 • Extended for IETF 87 • draft-pentikousis-icn-scenarios-04 • Added Evaluation Methodology section • Adoption by RG • Decision to focus and finalize scenarios, and spinoff the Evaluation Methodology parts as standalone draft • Updates and RG Decision Implementation for IETF 88 • draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios-00 • draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios-01 draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios
Advance since IETF 88 • Identify any scenarios that are not included so far • No new scenarios proposed based on peer-reviewed literature • No issues against the literature included either—its seems we’re done • Three open and independent reviews received on the mailing list • Comments were addressed in the version made available on the wiki for the London Interim • Further comments, suggestions, wordsmithing? Please join the editing session after this presentation draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios
Next Steps • Editing session today • Report on progress during ICNRG meeting on Monday • Proceed in the RFC publication path draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios