1 / 73

Relevant Authority and Dates

SEXUAL OFFENDER AND REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION ACT “ SORNA” STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEFENSES PARESH S. PATEL FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, DISTRICT OF MARYLAND APRIL 6, 2012. Relevant Authority and Dates. ■ SORNA Registration Provisions (42 U.S.C. § 16901-962)

tadhg
Télécharger la présentation

Relevant Authority and Dates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SEXUAL OFFENDER AND REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION ACT “SORNA”STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEFENSESPARESH S. PATELFEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, DISTRICT OF MARYLANDAPRIL 6, 2012

  2. Relevant Authority and Dates ■ SORNA Registration Provisions (42 U.S.C. § 16901-962) Signed into law on July 27, 2006 ■Criminal Failure to Register Provision (18 U.S.C. § 2250) Signed into law on July 27, 2006 ■SMART Guidelines: Final Guidelines (73 Fed. Reg. 38030) - Issued July 2, 2008 (Effective August 1, 2008 after notice and comm.) Suppl. Guidelines (76 Fed. Reg. 1630)- Issued Jan. 11, 2011 ■28 C.F.R. § 72.3 (Attorney General Reg. Making SORNA retroactive to pre-enactment and pre-implementation offenders) Interim Reg: Feb. 28, 2007; Final Reg: Jan. 28, 2011

  3. SORNA Registration Provisions(42 U.S.C. § 16901-962)

  4. SORNA REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS ■SORNA Replaces Wetterling Act (42 U.S.C. § 14071-73) ■SORNA much more onerous: - includes tribes and territories - expands definition of sex offenses - requires automatic registration w/o hearing on risk or classification as sex offender - requires internet posting for most offenders - increases duration of registration for some offenders - increases criminal penalties for failure to register

  5. SORNA Registration: Dual Obligations ■ Local Jurisdictions’ (States, Terr., Indian Tribes) Obligation: Must implement SORNA or lose money ■ Sex Offenders’ Obligation: Individual duty to register within local jurisdictions, regardless of state’s choice to implement SORNA.

  6. Pre-Implementation Challenge Rejected United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459 (4th Cir. 2009) ■ Defendant argued that SORNA does not apply in states which have not yet implemented SORNA: based on 42 U.S.C. § 16913(d) and SMART Guidelines (73 Fed. Reg. 38064) ■ Fourth Circuit as well as every other Circuit to have decided issue has rejectedargument: holding that SORNA imposes individual duty to register separate and apart from state’s obligations.

  7. SORNA REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT BASICS ■ Initial Registration: Each jurisdiction where sex offender resides, works, goes to school, & was convicted (if different from where resides) Before completing term of imprisonment OR within 3 days of receiving non-prison sentence. 42 U.S.C. § 16913(a)

  8. SORNA REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTBASICS ■Update Registration: Within 3 days of any change to name, residence, employment or student status Only need to update in one of the required jurisdictions, but must be in person 42 U.S.C. § 1963(b)

  9. SORNA REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT; BASICS ■ Verify Registration: • In-person at each jurisdiction where required to register • every year (Tier I) • every 6 months (Tier II) • every 3 months (Tier III) 42 U.S.C. § 16916

  10. FAILURE TO REGISTER18 U.S.C. § 2250(a)(2)(B)(State Sex Offenses) Elements: • Required to register under SORNA; • Travels in interstate commerce, and • Thereafter, knowingly fails to register or update as required by SORNA 10 year maximum penalty

  11. FAILURE TO REGISTER18 U.S.C. § 2250(a)(2)(A)(Federal, Territorial, and Tribal Sex Offenses) Elements: • Required to register under SORNA; and 2)Thereafterknowingly fails to register or update as required by SORNA 10 year maximum penalty

  12. SORNA AND FAILURE TO REGISTER: POSSIBLESTATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEFENSES

  13. DEFENSE 1: No “sex offense”

  14. WHAT CONSTITUTES A “SEX OFFENSE” ? ■ criminal offense that “has anelement involving a sexual act or sexual contact with another” ■ specified offense against a minor ■ certain listed federal, military, and foreign offenses ■ attempts or conspiracies ■ juvenile adj. for juveniles age 14 or older who commit offense comparable to or > severe than aggrav. sexual abuse under 18 U.S.C. 2241 or attempt or conspiracy to commit such crime. ■ certain consensual sexual acts 42 U.S.C. § 16911

  15. CATEGORICAL APPROACH AND “SEX OFFENSE” ■Only elements - not underlying conduct - can qualify prior crime as “sex offense” under SORNA. See Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13 (2005); Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) ■Attorney General has suggested categorical approach should apply with everything except for age of victim - SMART Guidelines: 73 Fed. Reg. 38031.

  16. CATEGORICAL APPROACH“SEXUAL ACT OR SEXUAL CONTACT WITH ANOTHER” ■ Requires “element involving a sexual act or sexual contact with another.” 42 U.S.C. § 16911 ■ Clause covers “all sexual offenses whose elements involve any type or degree of genital, oral, or anal penetration, or any sexual touching of or contact with a person’s body, either directly or through the clothing.” 73 Fed. Reg. 39051.

  17. CATEGORICAL APPROACH:“SPECIFIED OFFENSES AGAINST A MINOR”42 U.S.C. § 16911 - Non-parental kidnapping or false imprisonment of a minor - Solicitation of a minor to engage in sexual conduct - Use of a minor in a sexual performance - Solicitation of a minor to practice prostitution - Video voyeurism involving a minor - Possession, production, or distribution of child pornography - Criminal sexual conduct involving a minor and related internet activities - Any conduct that, by its nature, is a sex offense against a minor, including convictions for child molestation, sexual activity w/ underage persons and child prostitution.

  18. Categorical Approach: “Specified offenses against a minor” ■“criminal sexual conduct involving a minor” = “sexual offenses whose elements involve physical contact with the victim” or “offenses whose elements involve using others persons in prostitution” 72 Fed. Reg. 38052 ■ “conduct, that, by its nature, is a sex offense against a minor” = - “status of the victim as a minor” must be element of prior offense. 73 Fed. Reg. 38052 - “by its nature” language calls for categorical approach – See Cain v. State, 872 A.2d 682 (Md. 2005); State v. Chun, 76 P.3d 935 (Haw. 2003) Beware ofUnited States v. Dodge, 597 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 2010) ■ analogize to categorical approach used in ACCA/career offender “otherwise” clause which includes “involving conduct” language. ■ SORNA only applies to those convicted of a sex offense – not merely those who committed sex offense. 42 U.S.C. §16911 (1)

  19. Enumerated “sex offenses” ■Use Model Penal Code to determine generic definition of offense. SeeUnited States v. Peterson, 629 F.3d 432 (4th Cir. 2011).

  20. SMART GUIDELINES: RE-DEFINING OF “SEX OFFENSES” Beware of Attorney General’s expansion and addition of sex offenses beyond that specified by Congress in SORNA. - Plain language of SORNA does not allow Attorney General to add new offenses and broaden SORNA’s def. of “sex offenses.” - Attorney General not authorized to add new offenses; to read SORNA otherwise violates non-delegation doctrine. See Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 (1935). - Constitutional Avoidance. See Clark v. Martinez, 543 U.S. 371 (2005). Examples: ■ “Attempt” and “Conspiracy” – broadened by SMART Guidelines to include “assault with intent to rape” 73 Fed. Reg. 38051. ■ “Solicitation to engage in sexual conduct” redefined by SMART Guidelines to include “any direction, request, enticement, persuasion, or encouragement of a minor to engage in sexual conduct.” 73 Fed. Reg. 38051

  21. DEFENSE 2:Is Prior Offense a Valid Conviction?

  22. Valid Conviction • Must be conviction (42 U.S.C. § 16911) • Convictions that are set aside, expunged, or vacated do not count (SMART Guidelines: 73 Fed. Reg. 38050) • Foreign conviction obtained without sufficient safeguards for due process is invalid – 42 U.S.C. § 16911 and 73 Fed. Reg. 38050 – See U.S. State Dept. Country Reports on Human Rights Practices • Argue that any conviction is invalid if obtained without proper waiver of counsel – U.S. v. Custis, 511 U.S. 485 (1994) • Argue tribal convictions invalid if no right to counsel. – Sentencing Commission does not count them, U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2

  23. DEFENSE 3: Duration of reg. term expired?

  24. DURATION OF REGISTRATION: ■ Depends on Tier Level Determined by Type of Sex Offense and Prior Criminal History under 42 U.S.C. § 16911. 42 U.S.C. § 16915.

  25. DURATION OF REGISTRATION ■ Tier I: 15 years (or 10 years if “clean record”) Clean record: - No convictions for offenses punishableby more than one year; and - No sex offense convictions; and - No revocation of supervised release, parole, or probation; and - successful completion of cert. sex offender treatment program

  26. DURATION OF REGISTRATION ■ Tier II: 25 years – No clean record break ■ Tier III: Life (or 25 years with clean record) 16 U.S.C. § 16915

  27. DURATION OF REGISTRATION ■ Registration period begins to run 1) upon release from custody of an offender who has been incarcerated; 2) at time of sentencing, for an offender who receives non-prison sentence. ■ Permit, but do not require jurisdictions to toll registration while offender is incarcerated. SMART Guidelines: 73 Fed. Reg. 38068.

  28. DURATION OF REGISTRATON CLASSES OF SEX OFFENDERS ( Tier I, II, and III) Use categorical approach in determining tier except with respect to age of victim. SMART Guidelines: 73 Fed. Reg. 38053.

  29. DEFENSE 4:Has the offender established a “RESIDENCE”?

  30. Residence - Must register or update registration within 3 business days after sex offender establishes new “residence.” 42 U.S.C. § 16913 • Resides: “location of the individual’s home or other place where the individual habitually lives.” 42 U.S.C. § 16911. One “habitually lives” in a place if he stays there for 30 days. SMART Guidelines: 73 Fed. Reg. 38062. • Thus, if sex offender intends to live in place for 30 days, it is a residence, and he must register within three days of moving there. 73 Fed. Reg. 38062.

  31. Residence: Transients • Beware of United States v. Bruffy, 2012 WL 503808 (4th Cir. 2012) 4th Cir. found that defendant who moved from Florida established residence at a specific location in Va., even though he lived in his car most of the 23-day period in question and intended to get an apartment in Maryland after he found a job there. Because he failed to report this change of so called residence, he was convicted of failure to update registration in Florida and failing to register in Virginia. Seedissent – J. Gregory believes that defendant’s living situation was too transient and unstable that it was not “habitual” and therefore not “residence”

  32. Residence:Transients Even if offender does not have fixed abodes, must register with detailed information as possible of where one habitually lives (residence): i.e., part of city that is habitual locale – park or spot on street (or number of such places) where the sex offender stations himself during day or sleeps at night, shelters, and buildings frequented) SMART Guidelines: 73 Fed. Reg. 38055

  33. Residence: Transients • Sex offender must update registration when he terminates residence (leaves with no intention to return), even if he has no fixed future place of residence . SMART Guidelines: 73 Fed. Reg. 38066; See also United States v. Van Buren, 599 F.3d 170 (2d Cir. 2010); United States v. Voice, 622 F.3d 870 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. Murphy, 664 F.3d 798 (10th Cir. 2011); United States v. Bruffy, 2012 WL 503808 (4th Cir. 2012). But see dissent in Murphy, 664 F.3d 798 (No duty to update in former jurisdiction of residence because lang. in SORNA statute only requires reg. in jurisdiction in which one resides – not where he formerly resided)

  34. Residence: Transients Void for Vagueness United States v. Bruffy, 2012 WL 503808 (4th Cir. 2012): Rejected defense’s argument that the term “reside” in SORNA is unconstitutionally vague as applied to transient offenders who have vacated one residence, but have not yet established a fixed place to live in another state. Defense argued that SORNA fails to provide fair notice of the point in time when presence in a new jurisdiction triggers the registration requirement.

  35. DEFENSE 5: Pre-Implementation and Pre-Enactment Offenders

  36. Pre-Implementation and Pre-Enactment Offenders AG has the “authority” to decide if SORNA retroactive to pre-implementation and pre-enactment offenders and prescribe rules for their registration. 42 USC 16913(d)

  37. INTERIM REG. OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, 28 C.F.R. § 72.3 ■ Effective Feb. 28, 2007 ■ Makes SORNA applicable to pre-enactment and pre-imp. sex off. ■ Enacted pursuant to Congress’ directive – 42 U.S.C. § 16913(d) ■ No pre-enactment offender can be prosecuted under Failure to Register statute unless he traveled in interstate commerce and failed to register after Feb. 28, 2007. United States v. Hatcher, 560 F.3d 222 (4th Cir. 2009) ■ Argue no pre-implementation offender can be prosecuted under Failure to Register statute unless he traveled in interstate commerce and failed to register afterFeb. 28, 2007. United States v. Trent,654 F.3d 574 (6th Cir. 2011)

  38. Interim Regulation: APA Challenge ■ No notice and comment under Administrative Procedure Act before interim regulation, 28 C.F.R. § 72.3 ■ United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459 (4th Cir. 2009) No APA violation because good cause to excuse notice and comment ■ See J. Michael dissent in Gould ■ Split in the Circuits – Preserve for S.C. review Finding APA violation: United States v. Cain, 583 F.3d 408 (6th Cir. 2009); United States v. Utesch, 596 F.3d 302 (6th Cir. 2010); United States v. Valverde, 628 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2010) No APA violation: United States v. Dean, 604 F.3d 1275 (11th Cir. 2010); United States v. Johnson, 632 F.3d 912 (5th Cir. 2011) (found APA violation harmless); United States v. Dixon, 551 F.3d 578 (7th Cir. 2008) (assumed w/o deciding that reg. was valid).

  39. Interim Regulation: Standing of pre-enactment and pre-implementation offenders to make APA challenge to interim regulation ■Reynolds v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 975 (2012): Confirmed that pre-enactment offenders having standing to make APA challenge to interim regulation because the interim regulation – not Congress -- made SORNA applicable to pre-enactment offenders. ■ Under rationale of Reynolds, pre-implementation offenders also have standing to make APA challenge to interim regulation.

  40. Interim Regulation, 28 C.F.R. § 72.3: Finalized ■ Effective January 28, 2011; 75 Fed. Reg. 81849 ■ Issued after notice and comment ■ No viable APA challenge for failure to register and interstate travel afterJanuary 28, 2011 Beware of cases holding that any APA violation was cured by August 1,2008, eff. date of Final SMART Guidelines: United States v. Stevenson, __ F.3d __, 2012 WL 573326 (6th Cir. 2012); United States v. Utesch, 596 F.3d 302 (6th Cir. 2010); United States v. Valverde, 628 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2010).

  41. DEFENSE 6: Non-Delegation Doctrine

  42. Non-Delegation Doctrine United States v. Burns, 2011 WL 970644 (4th Cir. 2011) ■Def. argued Congress unlawfully delegated legislative authority to Attorney General to determine retroactivity of SORNA to pre- enactment offenders. ■4th Circuit rejects argument: holds that Attorney’s authority bounded by policies and requirements set forth in SORNA. ■But unpublished decision; preserve for S.C. review even though no split in the Circuits. S.C. might take up issue along with APA challenge to interim regulation. See dissent in Reynolds

  43. DEFENSE 7:Date of Travel afterUnited States v. Carr

  44. Interstate Travel must occur after passage of SORNA ■ United States v. Carr, 130 S. Ct. 2229 (2010) Under statutory terms of the Failure to Register statute, a sex offender can only be prosecuted if he traveled in interstate commerce after the enactment of SORNA on July 27, 2006. ■ But in Fourth Circuit under Hatcher, 560 F.2d 222, travel for pre-enactment and pre-imp. offenders must be not only after July 27, 2006, but also after February 28, 2007– date of interim regulation applying SORNA to pre-enactment and pre-imp. offenders. ■ But remember to preserve argument that travel for pre- enactment and pre-imp offenders must be after Jan. 28, 2011 – only then did AG issue valid reg. after n and c.

  45. DEFENSE 8: Group of Offenders Unable to Comply with SORNA

  46. SORNA REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT: Unable to Comply with SORNA AG must prescribe rules for registration of people unable to comply with SORNA’s initial registration requirements. 42 USC §16913(d); 42 USC §16913(b)

  47. Group of Offenders Unable to Comply withSORNA ■Gould, 568 F.3d 459 -Def. argued that he was unable to initially register under 42 U.S.C. § 16913(b) because he was released from prison on underlying sex offense beforeSORNA was enacted. - Fourth Circuit rejected argument: held sex offender isable to comply with SORNA if required to register under state law. ■Kennedy v. Allera, 612 F.3d 261 (2010) (Gets even worse) -Def. argued that he was unable to initially register because he was not required to register under state law. - In conflict withGould, Court held that a sex offender is able to comply with SORNA as long as a state sex offender registry exists – even if he is not required to register under state law.

  48. Group of Offenders Unable to Comply with SORNA ■See SMART Guidelines Examples: 38 Fed. Reg. 38063 Make plain that sex offenders are unable to comply with SORNA if not required to register under state law. ■Make constitutional avoidance argument: if not required to register, will get no notice required under due process.

  49. DEFENSE 9:No Notice of Duty to Register

  50. Duty to Notify and Ensure Registration, 42 USC 16917(a) An appropriate official shall, shortly before release of the sex offender from custody, or, if the sex offender is not in custody, immediately after the sentencing of the sex offender, for the offense giving rise to the duty to register--(1) inform the sex offender of the duties of a sex offender under this title and explain those duties; (2) require the sex offender to read and sign a form stating that the duty to register has been explained and that the sex offender understands the registration requirement; and (3) ensure that the sex offender is registered.

More Related