1 / 10

PHM 3020 Philosophy of Love

PHM 3020 Philosophy of Love. Michael Strawser strawser@mail.ucf.edu. The Lack of Love. According to Kierkegaard, “love is our greatest need,” and yet the philosophy of love has been lacking in our universities and departments of philosophy

tadita
Télécharger la présentation

PHM 3020 Philosophy of Love

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PHM 3020 Philosophy of Love Michael Strawser strawser@mail.ucf.edu

  2. The Lack of Love • According to Kierkegaard, “love is our greatest need,” and yet the philosophy of love has been lacking in our universities and departments of philosophy • Isn’t it ironic for philosophers, “lovers of wisdom,” not to devote their sustained reflections to love, not to love love?

  3. The Lack of Love • Consider these views: • Irving Singer: “In the last 60 years or so the analysis of love has been neglected more than almost any other subject in philosophy” (The Nature of Love, 1966, ix). • Jean-Luc Marion: “The Silence of Love” (The Erotic Phenomenon, 2007, 1,3) • bell hooks: “the world of the present [is] no longer a world open to love…lovelessness [has] become the order of the day” (All about Love, 2000, x).

  4. The Lack of Love • This course can then be seen as addressing the lack of love. • How exciting!

  5. Questions • Please write, no names • 1. What is the philosophy of love? • 2. What are your expectations for this course? • 3. Do you agree that philosophy does not love love? Why or why not?

  6. The Course Syllabus • http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~strawser/

  7. The Irony of Love • I don’t know what love is. I feel inadequate and embarrassed (“we are embarrassed by love” Diane Ackerman, A Natural History of Love, 1994). • There is support in Singer (Philosophy of Love, xvi) • …who also makes “no pretensions about definitive objectivity” (xiii).

  8. The Irony of Love • And support in Kierkegaard, who writes that love is “essentially inexhaustible and essentially indescribable” (Author’s Preface, Works of Love). • The meaning of love (its essence) is beyond words (the phenomena). • Consequently, this is a course not about love, but about the philosophy of love.

  9. The Philosophy of Love • Critical analysis of philosophical texts dealing with love. Thus we are concerned with a particular historical tradition. • A questioning of the meaning of love. • An experience of the profound visions of philosophers who have valued love as central to their philosophies. • The philosophy of love can be distinguished from the philosophy of sex and the psychology of love.

  10. The Edification of Love • Perhaps you’re wondering: “Isn’t what you intend by ‘the irony of love’ a cop out?” • Can one be serious about “the irony of love.” • Perhaps this negative movement can lead to the positive view that love is present and that “love edifies” (I Corinthians 8:1), that is builds up, makes us grow, transforms us into better beings. • The edification of love lies also at the center of this course on the philosophy of love.

More Related