1 / 23

High p T Φ in jets

High p T Φ in jets. Select pairs of oppositely charged tracks provided: p T (Jet)>50Gev; ( energetic jets ); ∆R(Φ,Jet)<0.4 ( tracks are assigned to the jet ); x ≣p T (K ± )/p T (jet)>0.1 ( energetic tracks ); N silicon >5 ( good tracks ); Χ/dof<2; ( good fit );

tahir
Télécharger la présentation

High p T Φ in jets

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. High pT Φ in jets Select pairs of oppositely charged tracks provided: pT(Jet)>50Gev; (energetic jets); ∆R(Φ,Jet)<0.4 (tracks are assigned to the jet); x ≣pT(K±)/pT(jet)>0.1 (energetic tracks); Nsilicon>5 (good tracks); Χ/dof<2; (good fit); d0<1mm (coming from the interaction point); ∆Z0<5mm (same PI); ∑Q=0 (balanced charge); Rp≣pT(track1)/pT(track2)<1.7 (balanced momentum). 0.17 good pairs/jet are selected

  2. High pT Φ in jets Dmitry Milstein, Ohad Mamroud and E.D. Results based on a first look at 30pb-1 of the data.

  3. Naive K+K- mass distribution K+K- K+K+ / K-K- Nice signal: How can we estimate the combinatorical background?

  4. Naive K+K- mass distribution 1) Threshold disagreement 2) ‘High’ mass disagreement

  5. Removing π+π- which are consistent with originating in ρ0 decay • ‘High’ mass problem solved!

  6. Comparison with simulation Threshold problem is not simulated!

  7. Crude background subtruction Data MC m(K+K-) m(K+K-) Very nice narrow mass peak at mΦ.

  8. η distribution of Φ candidates η(Φ) Reasonable agreement

  9. comparing xΦ in MC and Data XΦ No agreement!

  10. Transverse momentum spectrum pT(Φ) pT of Φ is well simulated

  11. High pT Φ pT(Φ)>50GeV pT(Φ)>60GeV pT(Φ)>70GeV pT(Φ)>80GeV pT(Φ)>90GeV

  12. See a signal even when pT(Φ)>100 GeV!

  13. N(K+K−) = a1+a2∗mK+K− +a3/(mK+K− −a4)+a5∗exp(−((mK+K− −a6)2/a7)) fit subtraction

  14. Di-Jet Event Selection • The two leading jets contain most of the transverse energy in the event: • The two leading jets are in a back-to-back configuration:Df ( jet1, jet2) > 3.0.

  15. Good Event / Bad Event Selection • The di-jet asymmetry is defined by: • good jets are defined as all jets in the event in which YT < 0.1. • Bad jets, on the other hand, are found in events in which YT > 0.3. • 59% of the back-to-back di-jet events are classified as good and only 0.9% as bad.

  16. Position Dependence • We clearly see hot spots in which badly measured jets tend to hit. • Still need to look more carefully at the Dead OTX correction.

  17. Charged Particle Association w/ Jets • The charged fraction carried by a jet defined by: • A large amount of badly measured jets have a high value of Rcharge. • We suggest cutting on Rcharge < 1.1 to remove bad jets. • After this cut, the YT distribution looks much nicer 

  18. Charged Particle Association w/ Jets (2) • Cutting on Rcharge < 1.1 removes 15% of the badly measured jets and barely removes any well measured jets.

  19. backup

More Related