1 / 21

SafetyAnalyst Overview Presentation

SafetyAnalyst Overview Presentation. Michael S. Griffith FHWA June 2003. Creative Destruction.

tahlia
Télécharger la présentation

SafetyAnalyst Overview Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SafetyAnalystOverview Presentation Michael S. Griffith FHWA June 2003

  2. Creative Destruction • “The stock market, like the economy, follows an incessant path of creative destruction. New technology, processes, and products continually supplant the old and tired in a capitalist system. New market leaders always challenge the old guard.” (Investor’s Business Daily, June 2, 2003)

  3. What is SafetyAnalyst? Vision Statement • Provide state-of-the-art analytical tools for use in the decision making process to identify and manage a systemwide program of site-specific improvements to enhance highway safety by cost-effective means

  4. Why is SafetyAnalystBeing Developed? • Both FHWA and participating state highway agencies have perceived a need to improve the analytical tools available to highway agencies for safety management of the highway system

  5. Participating States

  6. Who is DevelopingSafetyAnalyst? • Federal Highway Administration • Technical Working Group, 13 participating states • Midwest Research Institute and subcontractors • ITT Industries, Software development contractor

  7. Tools for Safety Management • To assist agencies in making better decisions about: • Where to make highway safety improvements • Determining what improvements to make • Evaluating the effectiveness of implemented safety improvements

  8. Scope • Addresses site-specific improvements based on site-specific needs, not general programs like vehicle design improvements, occupant restraints, etc. • Uses state-of-the-art technology to advance the state of the practice • Should be comprehensive – including all stages of the safety management process

  9. What Tools will be Available in SafetyAnalyst? • Network screening to identify sites with promise for safety improvement • Diagnosis of safety concerns • Selection of countermeasures • Economic appraisal of countermeasures • Priority ranking of countermeasures • Evaluation of implemented projects

  10. Target Audience Professionals involved in deciding: • Where to make highway safety improvements • Determining what improvements to make • Evaluating the effectiveness of implemented safety improvements

  11. Modules • 6 tools are incorporated in 4 modules • Module #1 – Network screening • Module #2 – Diagnosis and countermeasure selection • Module #3 – Economic appraisal and priority ranking • Module #4 - Evaluation

  12. Network Screening to Identify Sites with Promise • Use expected safety performance and actual accident history to review sites • Identify SITES WITH PROMISE – sites that have promise for reducing accidents in a cost-effective manner • Review entire roadway system or selected parts – roadway segments, intersections, ramps, railroad grade crossings, etc.

  13. Diagnose Safety Concerns at Selected Sites • Consider both sites with promise identified by network screening tool and from other sources • Identify accident patterns • Investigate causal factors • Consider site conditions and safety performance from engineering and human factors viewpoints • Assess whether a potentially correctable safety concern exists

  14. Select Appropriate Countermeasures • Present lists of countermeasures that are potentially appropriate for identified accident patterns and safety concerns • Final selection made by user • Where appropriate, user may select: • combination of countermeasures • alternative countermeasures for economic appraisal and priority ranking

  15. Economic Appraisal of Candidate Improvements • Assess expected project benefits • Assess expected project costs • Display results • Provide economic analysis and ranking compatible with HSIP requirements

  16. Priority Ranking of Candidate Improvements • Ranking by economic appraisal results: • Cost effectiveness ($/accident reduced) • Benefit-cost ratio (B/C) • Net present benefits (B – C) • Project selection to maximize safety benefits within a budget constraint • Integer programming • Dynamic programming • Incremental B/C ratio

  17. Evaluation • Use available data to estimate the safety effect of projects implemented at specific sites • Before-after evaluations using robust statistical techniques • Primary MOE – percentage reduction in accidents

  18. How Will Safety AnalystBe Implemented? • SafetyAnalyst will be implemented as a set of integrated software tools to perform key steps in the safety management process • SafetyAnalyst will be made available to highway agencies by FHWA • SafetyAnalyst will be maintained as the state of knowledge advances

  19. What Has Been Accomplished Already? • Project began: April 2001 • Meetings with TWG • Work plan and Marketing plan • White Papers with technical approaches to modules • Training course is being revised

  20. What Is the Planned Schedule? • “New Approaches to Highway Safety Analysis“ training course – Fall 2003 • Release interim tools – 2004 • Release final tools – 2006

  21. SafetyAnalyst Website www.safetyanalyst.org

More Related