60 likes | 160 Vues
This report presents the year-end review for the BGP Mux Spiral 2 project led by PI Nick Feamster at Georgia Tech. Key accomplishments include advancements in educational integration of BGP Mux into coursework, successful completion of problem sets by nine groups, and software releases for BGP Mux and EGRE tunnel instantiation. Despite issues such as waiting for additional IP address space and challenges with Emulab integration, future plans include improving integration with experimental environments, enhancing route control interfaces, and exploring additional deployment sites to support ongoing experiments.
E N D
BGP MuxSpiral 2 Year-end Project Review Georgia Tech PI: Nick Feamster Students: ValasValancius, YogeshMundada August 22, 2010
Route Control: Transit Portal (TP) • Give each service the illusion of its own upstream connectivity • Custom routes and ISPs • Sharing of numbered resources • Shared colocation and connectivity • Single contract with upstream ISPs • Amortizes costs of upstream connectivity. ISP2 ISP1 ISP3 Cloud Transit Portal Cloud Facility Virtual Router Virtual Router VoIP Service Streaming Service
Milestone & QSR Status • Security reviews were not completed because the relevant parties never approached us. • Still working on integration INSERT PROJECT REVIEW DATE
Accomplishments 1: Advancing GENI Spiral 2 Goals • Educational aspects of BGP Mux • Integrated BGP Mux into coursework • Problem Set posted and completed • Nine groups successfully completed • Integrating into graduate course this fall • BGP Mux software release • EGRE tunnel and node instantiation software release. • Deployment of BGP sessions in three locations • Demonstatrions at every GEC • Integration with OpenFlow-based campus network • Resource manager to be demonstrated at GEC 9 INSERT PROJECT REVIEW DATE
Issues • Still waiting on IP address space. Cannot support more than 8 experiments without more address space. • Integration with Emulab is difficult because we do not have the resources to pay an additional programmer to work with that team. • Solution: They should take our reference manager and figure out how to integrate it. • Acquiring more deployment sites is practically a full-time job because it requires following through with operators. INSERT PROJECT REVIEW DATE
Plans • Better integration with experimental environments (e.g., GENI, CoreLab) • Better interface to wide-area route control • BGP might be too complicated or heavyweight for many applications • Possible extensions • Back-haul between cloud facilities • IP prefix sharing • More deployment sites INSERT PROJECT REVIEW DATE