1 / 9

GE/ISLO’s

GE/ISLO’s. Moving Forward Devon Atchison, SLO Coordinator Angela Feres, SLO Assistant. What are GE/ISLOs?. GE/ISLOs – Our GE SLOs and our ISLOs are one and the same. They are Core Competencies we would like our students to gain during their time at Grossmont College.

tallys
Télécharger la présentation

GE/ISLO’s

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GE/ISLO’s Moving Forward Devon Atchison, SLO Coordinator Angela Feres, SLO Assistant

  2. What are GE/ISLOs? • GE/ISLOs – Our GE SLOs and our ISLOs are one and the same. They are Core Competencies we would like our students to gain during their time at Grossmont College. • Assessment – We are expected to assess our GE/ISLOs. • The first step was Mapping the GE/ISLOs to our Courses in the General Education package. • The second step is conducting assessments to see if our students have gained the Core Competencies detailed in our GE/ISLOs.

  3. What are our GE ISLOs • Productive Citizenry • Informational and Technological Literacy • Mathematical Literacy • Scientific Inquiry • Effective Communication • Cultural Competence • Understanding of Arts and Humanities

  4. What have we done so far re: GE/ISLOs Assessment? • Mapping • Workshops re: GE/ISLO Assessment • Fall 2011: We asked departments to bring Course-level Assessment Data and analyze it through the lens of our GE/ISLOs (i.e. did the Course-level Assessment address the GE/ISLO? Did students achieve the GE/ISLO?) • Spring 2012: We looked at Surveys to see if students achieved the GE/ISLOs • Henrietta Lacks Week Survey • Student Satisfaction Survey

  5. What did we learn from these Workshops? • Example from Fall 2010 Mapping Workshop : History mapped to Understanding of Arts and Humanities & Effective Communication. SLO 1 for all of these courses asked students to analyze primary and secondary sources to support a thesis statement. For HIST 101, students had an 84% pass rate, while HIST 114 students achieved a 78% pass rate. This demonstrates success in GE/ISLO Understanding of Arts and Humanities because students met the SLO mapped to the GE/ISLO. Students also achieved GE/ISLO Effective Communication because they read critically and analytically, identifying central arguments and lines of reasoning in a number of different kinds of texts. • Recommendation: No changes needed

  6. 2nd Example: Fall Workshop • Example Math: . “For GE/ISLO Mathematical Literacy students struggled with using a chart to determine percentages (only about 59% of students correctly answered the question) and thus were partially successful at achieving ML.” The tool is still useful because it provides a graph and asks students to read/understand the graph and use it to calculate a percentage. • Recommendation: Partially achieved ML. No recommendations for changes to the assessment tool, though the department may consider pedagogical strategies for increasing success.

  7. Henrietta Lacks Survey Data: Productive Citizenry • Workshop attendees looked at data from the HL survey in groups. They then responded as to the efficacy of the survey data for evaluating the GE/ISLO PC • Suggestion • better frame verbiage of survey questions • Should know how many are surveyed in order to make good judgments about efficacy • Many of questions as currently worded do not map well to the GE/ISLOs and therefore can’t really be used to assess achievement of those outcome.

  8. Data: Scientific Inquiry • Workshop attendees looked at data from the 2010 Student Satisfaction Survey in groups. They then responded as to the efficacy of the survey data for evaluating the GE/ISLO SI • As a college, we got a C+ on achieving SI, according to our data. We need more courses and programs to participate in providing data. • Suggestions: • How to get more programs to participate in providing data: reward programs for conducting assessments related to GE/ISLOs; Include more people in President’s Retreat to look at/analyze data re: GE/ISLOs; get more student and faculty awareness of GE/SLos. • Recommend that all programs keep GE/ISLOs in forefront of mind when constructing courses. • Show comparative data between colleges to stimulate improvement (Districtwide and Countywide data)—tie this to the college’s reputation.

  9. What are we doing next re: GE/ISLO Assessment? • Fall Faculty Inquiry Group • Selected faculty will assess Effective Communication • Already assigned research paper will be evaluated in regular fashion, with second rubric based eval to assess EC • Survey conducted in random classrooms • Question will be chosen related to a GE ISLO chosen at random • Volunteers will offer the question • Assess outcome • GE SLO Fall Flex Week Workshop • Revisit prior semester data, • Discuss FIG and Survey Question methods • Discuss other possible assessment methods

More Related