1 / 51

Microeconomics of Business Decision-Making

Microeconomics of Business Decision-Making. MBA 641 James Madison University. Week 1: Introduction. MBA 641 faculty. Bill Grant Bill Wood Brian O’Roark. Introduction to these videos. Part of MBA 641 course delivery, which also includes in-person kickoff and online meetings

talon-griffith
Télécharger la présentation

Microeconomics of Business Decision-Making

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Microeconomics ofBusiness Decision-Making MBA 641James Madison University

  2. Week 1: Introduction

  3. MBA 641 faculty • Bill Grant • Bill Wood • Brian O’Roark

  4. Introduction to these videos • Part of MBA 641 course delivery, which also includes in-person kickoff and online meetings • Coordinated with text materials

  5. Video features • Classic Content, developed for earlier cohorts (blue slide background) • Micro Updates, to introduce recent developments (green slide background) • Information Applications, to provide specific connections with the information industries (green slide background)

  6. Rules of the course • For details, consult the class syllabus, which is available in hard copy and online

  7. Microeconomics • Microeconomics is the study of individual decision-makers and markets • The field of economics most closely related to business decision-making • Within microeconomics, the most closely related subfield is “Industrial Organization” • Information economics emphasis

  8. What we’ll study • The relationships between and among • Market structure • Market conduct • Market performance • Connections with management, finance, marketing

  9. “Industry” and “industrial” • By themselves, words often imply old-line markets like steel and autos • Not the intention here • Methods we’ll study are those used by economists, analysts, judges and lawyers for analyzing any market – New Economy or old

  10. The Information Security Context

  11. Economics ofinformation security • Economics is the study of choice under scarcity • Scarcity is the inability to satisfy all wants at the same time • We do not have the ability to achieve perfect information security • Therefore, we choose

  12. Costs and benefits • In economics, we choose by considering costs and benefits of actions • Nichols, Ryan and Ryan (2000, pages 70-76) contains a framework for assessing costs and benefits

  13. The output • In ordinary service and manufacturing operations, the output is what we sell to make money • The output of information security is confidentiality, integrity and availability • We can express (but not measure) output of information security as “probability of not experiencing” a given failure

  14. A continuum • Risk is the antithesis of security • At far left on the line below, there are high levels of risk and low levels of security • At far right, low risk and high security High risk Low risk Low security High security

  15. Costs of information security • Starting from a highly insecure operation, basic security measures (sound passwords, for example) increase security at low cost • As we become more secure, the cost gets greater and greater • Realistically, we never get to complete security • Focus is on costs of defense

  16. Security cost curve (Also known as defense profile)

  17. Benefits of information security • Starting from a highly insecure operation, benefits of information security are high • However, the more secure you get, the less value additional security has • There comes a point at which additional security is not cost-justified • Emphasis is on avoiding damage

  18. Security benefit curve (Also known as damage profile)

  19. A security equilibrium • Nichols, Ryan and Ryan don’t think their equation (p. 70) can be used to make a quantitative determination of risk level • Neither does the diagram you’re about to see make such a claim • However, we can usefully think about information security in the context of the diagram

  20. Find the “X” (Where the damage profile intersects the defense profile)

  21. How the security optimum changes • We don’t have control over our defense profile when an adversary acts strategically • Developments in countermeasures can affect costs of security (defense profile) • When vulnerability goes up, damage profile higher (more benefit to security) • When impact of threat goes up, damage profile higher (more benefit to security)

  22. Strategic opponent

  23. Reduced cost of security

  24. Increased vulnerability or impact

  25. Summary • Sound decisions about risk and security require consideration of the security optimum • We have seen how a number of different developments can affect what the optimum is

  26. What do firms do? • “Maximize profit,” but it’s not that simple • This has become an area of research called “Firms’ Objectives and Strategic Behavior”

  27. Firms maximize profit • Beginning assumption • Assumes firms are maximizing long-term profit, or, “the (stock market) value of the firm” • Why not just ask?

  28. Profit maximizing diagram

  29. Difficulty: firms can’t maximize • Managers can’t calculate MR = MC • But managers do it intuitively • The wide receiver and the quarterback • Costs of Administrative Command go up with size (Coase) • Opportunistic behavior occurs (Williamson)

  30. More difficulties • Shirking in team behavior • Team output is greater than the sum of the outputs produced by individual members of the team • Still, compensation by team gives members an incentive to loaf, or “shirk” • Agency costs: costs that a principal incurs to see that an agent acts as expected

  31. Difficulty: firms won’t maximize • This requires • Market power • Separation of ownership from control (Berle and Means) • But what else could they maximize? • Sales (Baumol) • Utility (Williamson)

  32. Sales maximization

  33. Utility maximization • Some choices a firm makes directly affect the happiness of executives • Charitable donations, flight arrangements, thickness of carpet

  34. Profitability of carpet choice

  35. Utility of carpets and profit

  36. Utility maximizing

  37. What if they don’t maximize? • To “satisfice” is to settle for less than the maximum profit • Possible in a non-competitive environment

  38. Complications • Uncertainty, with asymmetric rewards to managers • In some organizations managers get • Small rewards for successes • Big penalties for failures • Inevitable result: The CYA attitude • (lack of creativity, risk taking)

  39. So why assume profit-max? • With all these complications, why do we still assume firms maximize profits? • Three last-ditch defenses

  40. 1. The takeover threat • If a firm does not maximize profits, the firm’s stock will reflect that poor performance • A takeover artist will buy up the firm, kick the lazy managers out, make big money

  41. 2. Survival of the firm • In good times, even non-maximizing firms survive • In recessions, only the profit-maximizers survive • Over time, we observe only profit-maximizers remaining

  42. 3. Stock options • Executives are increasingly compensated according to the company’s stock value • One leading mechanism: stock options • Makes executives more interested in maximizing profits • Imprecise mechanism at best

  43. Summary • There are many difficulties and complications that keep firms from maximizing profits • But there are countering forces that leave profit maximization still the most common assumption for how firms behave

  44. Micro Update • Theory of the firm holds up well. • Basic information security model holds up well. • The models haven’t changed, but the examples have.

  45. Changes in infosec threats: 1 • Hand-held devices have spread and multiplied. • Users demand access to organizational resources. • Access implies vulnerability.

  46. Changes in infosec threats: 2 • Social networking has increased. • Not just personal, but also a business strategy for many. • Social networking reduces security

  47. Changes in infosec threats: 3 • Malicious software has reached a new level of sophistication. • Stuxnet:"Countries hostile to the United States may feel justified in launching their own attacks against US facilities, perhaps even using a modified Stuxnet code," ISIS concluded. "Such an attack could shut down large portions of national power grids or other critical infrastructure using malware designed to target critical components inside a major system, causing a national emergency." Source: The Christian Science Monitor http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/0103/Stuxnet-attack-on-Iran-nuclear-program-came-about-a-year-ago-report-says

  48. Information Applications

  49. Primary fact • The most important economic fact about information’s costs is: Information is costly to produce but cheap to reproduce

  50. Primary strategy issue • A key strategy issue in information economics is: The tension between giving away information (to let people know what you have to offer) and charging for it to receive revenue

More Related