1 / 7

BVC Civil Procedure

BVC Civil Procedure. Interim Injunctions. Injunctions. Mandatory – compels a person to act in a particular way Prohibitory – restrains a person from acting in a particular way Final – an injunction which is granted as a remedy at the conclusion of civil proceedings

talon-spencer
Télécharger la présentation

BVC Civil Procedure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BVC Civil Procedure Interim Injunctions

  2. Injunctions • Mandatory – compels a person to act in a particular way • Prohibitory – restrains a person from acting in a particular way • Final – an injunction which is granted as a remedy at the conclusion of civil proceedings • Interim – during proceedings

  3. Injunctions • s37(1) of the Supreme Court Act 1981/s38 of the County Courts Act 1984 • South Buckinghamshire District Council v Porter [2003] 2 AC 558 • The Siskina [1979] AC 210 • Khorasandjian v Bush [1993] QB 727

  4. Interim injunctions • PD 25.4 • CPR 25.2(2) (Bates v Lord Hailsham of St Marylebone [1972] 1 WLR 1373) • Draft order should be provided (PD 25.5.3) • (PD 25.5.1(1) ) – undertaking in damages • American Cyanamid v Ethicon [1975] AC 396

  5. American Cyanamid criteria • serious issue to be tried • Adequacy of damages • Is the respondent adequately protected by the undertaking (Morning Star Co-operative Society Ltd v Express Newspapers [1979] FSR 113)? • The balance of convenience • maintenance of the status quo • merits of the parties’ cases (Series 5 Software v Clarke [1996] 1 All ER 853)

  6. Exceptions to American Cyanamid • ss219-220, s221Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act • Final disposal of dispute (NWL Ltd v Woods [1979] 1 WLR 1294) • Justification defence (Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269) • s12 Human Rights Act 1998 (Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2004] 3 WLR 918 ) • no arguable defence (Official Custodian for Charities v Mackey [1985] Ch 168) • mandatory interim injunctions - Zockoll Group Ltd v Mercury Communications Ltd [1998] FSR 354.

  7. Bars and defences • Delay or acquiescence (Bunn v British Broadcasting Corporation [1998] 3 All ER 552) • exceptional hardship • Inequitable behaviour by the applicant • No practical purpose (G v Harrow London Borough Council (2004) Lawtel 20th January 2004) • Personal services (Warren v Mendy [1989] 1 WLR 853)

More Related