1 / 40

Ang Lihim at Himala sa Likod ng mga ER

Ang Lihim at Himala sa Likod ng mga ER. In Focus. show the spuriousness of many ERs used in the 2004 presidential and vice presidential elections including Comelec Resolution No. 6667 illustrate the various modus operandi used to tamper with the ERs

talor
Télécharger la présentation

Ang Lihim at Himala sa Likod ng mga ER

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ang Lihim at Himala sa Likod ng mga ER

  2. In Focus • show the spuriousness of many ERs used in the 2004 presidential and vice presidential elections including Comelec Resolution No. 6667 • illustrate the various modus operandi used to tamper with the ERs • prove that the 2nd Generation of electoral fraud was committed in 2004 polls to benefit GMA and Noli de Castro

  3. 1st Generation Involves the BALLOTS (e.g. ballot-switching, fake ballots) Generations of Fraud Costly, Material and Manpower-intensive

  4. 2nd Generation Involves tampering of either or all of the ff: the Election Returns (ERs), Statement of Votes (SOVs), or Certificates of Canvass (COCs) Generations of Fraud More subtle, economical process

  5. Why tamper with the ERs? • It’s the BASIC SOURCE of documents in elections since it reflects the tally of votes cast at the precinct level • It’s prepared in and originated from ELECTORAL PRECINCTS nationwide • HOWEVER, many ERs in 2004 indicate that they were prepared under conditions that afforded the operators/manipulators the luxury of time and convenience of place

  6. “…so why tamper with the ERs and not with the SOVs and COCs?”

  7. If one tampers with the ERs, the fraudulent number of votes stated in the ERs are collated in the SOVs The data on the SOVs, in turn, are collated in the COCs So, when one examines the SOVs & COCs, they will not be able to detect fraud committed in the ERs

  8. “Why was it that the legal technicalities were raised to prevent the direct examination of ERs during the canvassing by Congress of the votes cast for the President and Vice President?” Inaanyayahan natin ang Sambayanang Pilipino na gumawa ng sariling PAGSUSURI at PAGHATOL!

  9. Prepared in accordance with the law and its rules and regulations, then they are AUTHENTIC Kung tama ang pagkagawa… TUNAY Determining the Authenticity of ERs IF NOT, then they are SPURIOUS, FAKE, UNRELIABLE because they were NOT CORRECTLY PREPARED and, therefore, NOT AUTHENTIC Kung mali ang pagkagawa… BALE WALA

  10. ‘The Eye Openers’ and the‘Tip of the Iceberg’

  11. Two ERs supposed to have been prepared in 2 different places, HUNDREDS OF KILOMETERS AWAY, were observed to be the same...

  12. - in form - in pattern - in manner of execution These 2 ERs were the EYE OPENER that proved to be The TIP OF THE ICEBERG leading to what are SCHEMATIC,“SURGICAL” FRAUDS in the Election Returns (ERs)!

  13. The Law on Election Returns (ERs)

  14. The Law on ERs • Stripped to the bones, the salient portions of RES. NO. 6667 are the INSTRUCTIONS to the Board of Election Inspectors (BEI) • The INSTRUCTIONS are Simple Enough for the BEI to obey

  15. Slide 9 Because of the importance of the INSTRUCTIONS in the preparation of the ERs, the said INSTRUCTIONS are placed, conspicuously, at the UPPER, LEFT CORNER of the ERs

  16. Emphasis was made on INSTRUCTION No. 5: 1. Closing Signatures (“…signing names”) NOT MERE INITIALS 2. Closing Thumbmarks (“…affixing clear prints of thumbmarks”) NOT TINY, SMALL fingerprints

  17. The Patterns That Say A Lot

  18. The Patterns That Say A Lot A. The NAKED PATTERN (NKD) on Tally Bars (TARAS) and their “closing”

  19. In violation of INSTRUCTION No. 5, the tally bars are not COMPLETELY and PROPERLY “CLOSED.”

  20. The Patterns That Say A Lot B. The SEMI-NAKED PATTERN (SNKD) on Tally Bars (TARAS) and their “closing”

  21. In violation of INSTRUCTION No. 5, the tally bars are NOT CORRECTLY and COMPLETELY “CLOSED” • Many of the supposed “CLOSING SIGNATURES” were often mere INITIALS • CLOSING THUMBMARKS are NOT THERE to “close” the tally bars

  22. The Small Fingerprint Pattern (SFP)

  23. SFP INSTRUCTION No. 5 requires “closing” the tally bars entries with clear imprints of THUMBMARKS (BEI).

  24. In the ERs, the “closing” fingerprints are so TINY, so SMALL that they prevent proper identification

  25. Violative of pertinent instructions, these small fingerprints constitute basis of the SPURIOUSNESS of the ERs.

  26. Spurious ERs are EVERYWHERE! In Cebu City alone: 470 NKD and SNKD ERs + 700 SFP ERs were discovered for a total of… 1,170 SPURIOUS ERs and about 3,000 of the 5,000 ERs analyzed were SPURIOUS

  27. How All of These Translate to Number of Votes

  28. How These Translate to Number of Votes • With the Loren-De Castro vote margin (ER level) at 70 and FPJ-GMA vote margin at 100 • Considering the reported 32,000 sets of OVERPRINTED ERs rounded off to 30,000 ERs

  29. How These Translate to Number of Votes Computed using the previously cited approximation vote-margin rate: Loren-De Castro Votes: 2.1 million FPJ-GMA Votes: 3 million Something like 2M plus votes and 3M plus votes, respectively--insurance votes at that. 2nd Generation of electoral fraud was used also in Bohol, Iloilo, Pampanga and other areas as well.

  30. The 2004 Election Returns were not prepared in the election precincts, but ELSEWHERE!!!

  31. The WHY and the HOW

  32. The answer comes easy. Why? Many are of the belief that the elections were over even before the counting of votes was started. Tapos na ang halalan, bago pa man mag-umpisa ang botohan!

  33. Answer may be hard to find but there are telltale signs of the fraud committed: How? • Designs in the thumbmarks • Wholesale preparation of the tally bar entries on the ERs • The substituted pages of the ERs

  34. 2G FRAUD

  35. 2G FRAUD The tell-tale signs of fraud confirms that MADE TO ORDERElection Returns were prepared in a hotel located near Edsa and in another place in Metro Manila.

  36. 2G FRAUD The information states that the spurious ERs were made by a group of professionals, a sub group of accomplished operators numbering about 200, of core members (so-called pianistas, golden hands) who implemented a systematic, schematic, well-financed, well-managed and well-supervised electoral fraud.

  37. 2G FRAUD That the GMA-Noli Tandem chose to use the 2nd GENERATIONof election fraud is the first of its kind in the last 40 years of Philippine electoral fraud.

More Related