1 / 22

Developing Needs Assessment Instruments for a Proactive Approach to Students with ADHD and Autism Spectrum Disorder

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (21531020). Developing Needs Assessment Instruments for a Proactive Approach to Students with ADHD and Autism Spectrum Disorder. Tomone Takahashi (Shinshu University, JAPAN) tomonet@shinshu-u.ac.jp. Overview.

tamah
Télécharger la présentation

Developing Needs Assessment Instruments for a Proactive Approach to Students with ADHD and Autism Spectrum Disorder

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (21531020) Developing Needs Assessment Instruments for a Proactive Approach to Students with ADHD and Autism Spectrum Disorder Tomone Takahashi (Shinshu University, JAPAN) tomonet@shinshu-u.ac.jp

  2. Overview • Developing questionnaires to evaluate students’ support needs related with ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) and ADHD • Reliability and validity of the questionnaires • An application of the questionnaires to early intervention for students with special needs

  3. Proactive approach to students’ physical and mental health • Proactive student support system has been developed in order to prevent serious physical and mental problems. • Physical health: • University-wide health examination • Short interview with physician (medical doctor) • Mental health • Mental health checklist is administered to all freshmen • Counselors contact with students

  4. Students with ASD, ADHD, LD: Rising issue • Increasing number of students with ADHD, ASD, LD • Academic and behavioral problems are reported • Many students are not aware of the possible disabilities • Developing secondary emotional and psychological problems • Proactive approach is necessary

  5. Needs Assessment Questionnaire • Symptoms checklist → Needs Assessment • There are students with clear symptoms but without support needs • Needs assessment is necessary for early intervention • Developing needs assessment questionnaires for students with ASD and ADHD

  6. Developing Support Needs Questionnaire for students with ASD (SNQ-ASD) 1 • Constructing a list of items describing difficulties persons with ASD experience • Case reports • Books written by persons with ASD • Existing self-rating questionnaire • Items are categorized using qualitative content analysis (Myering, 1983)

  7. Developing Support Needs Questionnaire for students with ASD (SNQ-ASD) 2 • Questionnaire items that represent the items in the category were written • “having trouble” or “having difficulty” are included in the items so that they can be easily connected with support needs

  8. Developing Support Needs Questionnaire for students with ASD (SNQ-ASD) 3 • SNQ-ASD • 4-point rating scale • 25-items • 2 subscales: Social difficulties, Autism related difficulties • An item was added asking whether he/she wants to consult with specialists • 3 point scale: Yes– cannot decide – No • Asking contact phone number or e-mail address

  9. Reliability and Validity of SNQ-ASD Self-rating questionnaire evaluating ASD related symptoms Self-rating questionnaire evaluating social anxiety

  10. Application of the SNQ-ASD • The SNQ-ASD was administered to 1909 freshmen during their first semester. • Students who expressed interest in talking more about their issues: 118 (5.9%) • Students who wrote contact information: 79 (3.9%) • Students who met with student support coordinator: 16 (0.8%) • Referred to counselors: 2 (0.1%)

  11. Application of the SNQ-ASD • Primary concerns (N = 16) • Social issues: 10 • Mental Health: 2 • Physical Health: 2 • Academic issues: 2 • Some students showed difficulties possibly related with ASD such as remembering faces and talking in unique ways.

  12. Conclusion 1: SNQ-ASD • It may be more sensitive to the difficulties that students with social anxiety or other psychological issues than those with ASD • Students with ASD may not be able to objectively evaluate their own difficulties • Students with ASD may not have as many difficulties during the early stage of their college life

  13. Developing Support Needs Questionnaire for students with ADHD (SNQ-ADHD) 1 • Constructing a list of items describing difficulties persons with ADHD experience • Items are categorized using KJ method (Kawakita, 1967) • Items were written as the same way as the ones in SNQ-ASD

  14. Developing Support Needs Questionnaire for students with ADHD (SNQ-ADHD) 2 • SNQ-ADHD • 4-point rating scale • 49-items • 7 subscales: distractibility, difficulty in planning, impulsivity, organizational problems, sleep problem, inattention, lack of social skills, clumsiness • An item was added asking whether he/she wants to consult with specialists • 3 point scale: Yes– cannot decide – No

  15. Reliability and Validity of SNQ-ADHD 1 2 weeks interval Self rating questionnaire evaluating ADHD symptoms Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test: Cognitive test that evaluate sustained attention and impulsivity

  16. Reliability and Validity of SNQ-ADHD 2 Profile of Mood States: A self-rating questionnaire evaluating mood or affective states.

  17. Interview with students • Participants: 12 students (3 male & 9 female) who scored high on the SNQ-ADHD and volunteered for interview session. • Mean = 197.3, SD = 39.0 • Mean of 646 students = 148.5. SD = 40.5 • Procedure: 60 minutes semi-structured interview.

  18. Interview with students • All students talked about episodes similar to those with ADHD. • “I have lost my wallet three times.” • “I cannot estimate the time I need for preparation and am often late.” • Some of them have had symptoms since their childhood. • “Teachers wrote I am forgetful in my report card” • I was late even when I was in elementary school.”

  19. Interview with students • Many of them did not seek for formal support. • “ This is something I have to take care by myself.” • “I have never thought that I can consult with other people about this issue.” • They develop strategies to take care of their issues. • They use informal peer support.

  20. Conclusions 2: SNQ-ADHD • It seems to be valid to evaluate attention related difficulties of students. • Many students do not consider using formal supports for the difficulties. • Informal supports seemed to be effective for those students. • Some of them showed interests in learning strategies and skills to change the situation

  21. Future Directions • Collecting validity data by administering the questionnaires to students with diagnosis • Application to evaluating the effectiveness of support services. • Developing combined short form questionnaire • Developing skill training workshops for those with difficulties related with ADHD or ASD

  22. Thank you for listening Please contact for English version of the questionnaires. tomonet@shinshu-u.ac.jp Special thanks to: Natsumi Yamamoto Misa Iwabuchi

More Related