1 / 15

Customizing Your Client-Information Systems

Customizing Your Client-Information Systems. Chapter Three. Introduction. Evaluation is client-information Record keeping is key Head counts vs patterns What do you want to know What info can be used from health history questions. Introduction cont…. Use of computer spreadsheets

tamas
Télécharger la présentation

Customizing Your Client-Information Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Customizing Your Client-Information Systems Chapter Three

  2. Introduction • Evaluation is client-information • Record keeping is key • Head counts vs patterns • What do you want to know • What info can be used from health history questions

  3. Introduction cont… • Use of computer spreadsheets • Most programs file personal data in folders • Client surveys are lumped by date • Data is unobtainable • Information can show who your client base is • Tracking is comparing info across times

  4. Head Counts • How many people at a given time • Does not tell you demographics? • Payment is an easy tracking tool • Renewal rates compare over time • Payment for classes tells single use stats • Sign-in sheets may also be used

  5. Tracking • Membership growth • New minus old members • Member attrition rates • (# at start/# at end) x 100 • Avg. length of membership • 1/member attrition

  6. Tracking cont… • Net difference in growth is pos. or neg. • Should be tabulated monthly and annually • Compare over time for patterns and trends • Who is a drop-out • Someone not currently enrolled • Not enrolled for 12 months

  7. Aggregate User Rates • Low enrollment or user rates may determine life of a program • User periods such as day of week and time of day • Use sign-in sheets for treadmill and pool • Determine where people are and what they use

  8. Aggregate User Rates cont… • Still no demographics • Individual rates show demographics • Gender • Age • Skill level • Monitor users for drop-outs • Improvement vs user rates

  9. Aggregate User Rates cont… • Page 32 • Table 3.1 • User rates • Male vs female • Skipping patterns • Individual rates show more detail

  10. Client Profiles • Who is attracted to the programs • High and low frequency users • Adherers vs drop-outs • Who improves most • Does client profile change over time • Compare to other sectors

  11. Client Profiles cont… • Use client history forms to gather info • Gender and age are only two • Height and weight • Ethnicity • Working vs retired

  12. Client Satisfaction • Get clients annual money then show indifference • Clients are more discriminating now • It costs 5x more to attract than keep members • Must keep clients satisfied • Satisfaction surveys are simple

  13. Response Bias • Surveys are skewed positive • 80% of consumers will report satisfaction no matter what the service • 2/3 of consumers will switch because of the instructor • Satisfied consumers tell 3 other people • Dissatisfied consumers will not complain but tell 9 or 10 people

  14. Response Bias cont… • Word of mouth is critical • People will switch because of service not because of the program • Service provider is technical but service is not • People leave before the survey is handed out

  15. Representativeness • Surveys at end of program • Only those in attendance fill them out • Include and envelope for self delivery • Avoid holidays • Survey more than one class • Instructor should not do survey • Consider mailing the survey • Look at % of respondents

More Related