1 / 30

NEW VIRTUA VOORHEES HOSPITAL

NEW VIRTUA VOORHEES HOSPITAL. Voorhees, NJ. Paul Stewart Structural Option Senior Thesis Presentation 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. PRESENTATION OUTLINE. BUILDING LOCATION. Introduction Existing Structural System Proposal Design of Helipad Redesign of Lateral System

tammyo
Télécharger la présentation

NEW VIRTUA VOORHEES HOSPITAL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NEW VIRTUA VOORHEES HOSPITAL Voorhees, NJ Paul Stewart Structural Option Senior Thesis Presentation 2010 The Pennsylvania State University

  2. PRESENTATION OUTLINE BUILDING LOCATION • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Redesign of Lateral System • Breadth Study • Conclusion Virtua Hospital Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  3. PRESENTATION OUTLINE BUILDING DATA • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  4. PRESENTATION OUTLINE EXISTING STRUCTURAL SYSTEM • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Gravity System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  5. PRESENTATION OUTLINE EXISTING STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Foundations - Geopiers • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Gravity System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  6. PRESENTATION OUTLINE EXISTING STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Moment Frames Braced Frames • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Lateral System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  7. PRESENTATION OUTLINE RELOCATION OF HELIPAD • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  8. PRESENTATION OUTLINE REDESIGN OF LATERAL SYSTEM • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  9. PRESENTATION OUTLINE HELIPAD REQUIREMENTS • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Helipad Location • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  10. PRESENTATION OUTLINE LOCATION OF HELIPAD • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Helipad Location • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  11. PRESENTATION OUTLINE HELIPAD SLAB DESIGN • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Helipad Design • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  12. PRESENTATION OUTLINE HELIPAD SLAB DESIGN • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Helipad Design • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  13. PRESENTATION OUTLINE GRAVITY COLUMN REDESIGN • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Helipad Design • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  14. PRESENTATION OUTLINE GRAVITY COLUMN REDESIGN • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Helipad Design • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion TRANSFER GIRDER Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  15. PRESENTATION OUTLINE GRAVITY COLUMN REDESIGN • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Helipad Design • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion NEW COLUMN Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  16. PRESENTATION OUTLINE GRAVITY COLUMN REDESIGN • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Helipad Design • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  17. PRESENTATION OUTLINE GRAVITY COLUMN REDESIGN • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Helipad Design • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  18. PRESENTATION OUTLINE GRAVITY COLUMN REDESIGN • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Helipad Design • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  19. PRESENTATION OUTLINE ACOUSTICAL • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Acoustical • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  20. PRESENTATION OUTLINE LATERAL LOADS • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Lateral Loads • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  21. PRESENTATION OUTLINE RAM MODEL • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • RAM Model • Conclusion • Applied Lateral Load Cases: • Seismic • Wind Case 1 – 4 • Applied Load Combinations: • 1.4D • 1.2D + 1.6L + .5(Lr or S) • 1.2D + 1.6(Lr or S) + (L or 0.8W) • 1.2D + 1.6W + L + 0.5(Lr or S) • 1.2D + 1.0E + L + 0.2S • 0.9D + 1.6W • 0.9D + 1.0E Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  22. PRESENTATION OUTLINE LOCATION OF BRACES • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Braced Frame Design • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  23. PRESENTATION OUTLINE TYPICAL BRACES • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Braced Frame Design • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  24. PRESENTATION OUTLINE INTERACTION WITH THE ARCHITECTURE • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Braced Frame Design • Conclusion • Braces do not interfere with rooms or hallways • Braces are visible at the interior courtyards Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  25. PRESENTATION OUTLINE DRIFT • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Lateral Calculations • Conclusion Max Wind Drift Max Seismic Drift Δ Δ East – West: Δ North – South: East – West: Δ North – South: Δ = 4.16” Δ = 1.31” Δ = 2.33” Δ = 2.93” 0.010*H = 16.8” H/400 = 4.2” H/400 = 4.2” 0.010*H = 16.8” Δ = Cd * δ Δ = Cd * δ I I Existing East – West: Existing North – South: Existing North – South: Existing East – West: Δ = 0.35” Δ = 0.13” Δ = 0.83” Δ = 0.25” Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  26. PRESENTATION OUTLINE CENTER OF MASS/RIGIDITY • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Lateral Calculations • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  27. PRESENTATION OUTLINE CONCLUSIONS • Helipad will be located in Zone 5 • The Pad will be designed as a two – way slab • New columns will be introduced along column line Ma • The façade of the building will be changed • Lateral system will eliminate of moment frames • Braced frames will not interfere with the architecture • Drift values will be larger, but still acceptable • Differences in COM and COR are generally the same • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  28. PRESENTATION OUTLINE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion • Thank you to the following people for their help throughout the year: • Virtua Health • Turner Company • Penn State Architectural Engineering Faculty and Students • Family and Friends Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  29. PRESENTATION OUTLINE QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? • Introduction • Existing Structural System • Proposal • Design of Helipad • Breadth Study • Redesign of Lateral System • Conclusion Questions? Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

  30. PRESENTATION OUTLINE FOUNDATION REDESIGN Paul Stewart Structural Option 4/12/2010

More Related