1 / 13

A Fair Test of the IAPT LTC/MUS Pathfinders

A Fair Test of the IAPT LTC/MUS Pathfinders. IAPT data GBU analysis?. Professor Simon Jones Ms Eleni Theodorou. Objectives:. To : Share our outline analysis plan What data to we have for the evaluation? What is Good, Bad, or Ugly? . Subgroups of interest.

tamra
Télécharger la présentation

A Fair Test of the IAPT LTC/MUS Pathfinders

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Fair Test of the IAPT LTC/MUS Pathfinders IAPT data GBU analysis? Professor Simon Jones Ms Eleni Theodorou

  2. Objectives: To : • Share our outline analysis plan • What data to we have for the evaluation? • What is Good, Bad, or Ugly?

  3. Subgroups of interest • Question: How can we identify people in the • various groups? • Data sources • Fields and Codes • GBU analysis

  4. Data Analysis for LTC & MUS service users For each of the subgroups • Socio-Demographics profile • Common mental health problems and other comorbidities • describe duration and type of intervention • outcomes of intervention • explore and quantify relations between independent/predictor variables • Question: Are there any other analysis which you would find useful?

  5. Outcome scales • Personal Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) • Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD) score • Work and Social Adjustment Scale Score (W&SAS) Question: Which outcome is the most appropriate for MUS/LTC? • GBU analysis

  6. Data Validation Study Validate the self-reported co-morbidities from IAPT dataset a against CHOICE (NIHR Programme Grant) data set based on routinely collected primary and secondary healthcare data sets (i.e. Doncaster and Newham). Primary care services Acute/Secondary Services Outpatient activity In-patient activity Accident and Emergency activity • Use of medication • Psychotropic • Non-psychotropic • Referral rate

  7. Economic analysis To ascertain the cost-effectiveness of the service in improving the outcomes of the different patient sub-groups • Convert PHQ-9 into QALYs • See Brazier, Yang , Tsuchiya , Rowen (2010) A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures, Eur J Health Econ. • To validate the map between PHQ-9 and EQ-5D we will also seek to identify a dataset where both PHQ-9 and EQ-5D are measured and observed and can be regressed along with interaction and polynomial effects to account for non-linearity and other confounding variables.

  8. IAPT Highlight Report

  9. IAPT MDS - Personal and demographic details

  10. IAPT MDS - Disability

  11. IAPT MDS - Referral details

  12. IAPT MDS- Appointment details

  13. Thanks for listening Simon Jones simonjones@surrey.ac.uk Acknowledgements: XXX

More Related