1 / 40

Body Composition

Body Composition. Body Composition. 2 component model Fat tissue Fat free tissue. Body Composition. Why the interest? Excess body fat Hypertension Type 2 diabetes Hyperlipidemia Certain cancers Poor performance/function Poor self-image Incident of overweight is ↑ng

tana
Télécharger la présentation

Body Composition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Body Composition

  2. Body Composition 2 component model Fat tissue Fat free tissue

  3. Body Composition Why the interest? Excess body fat • Hypertension • Type 2 diabetes • Hyperlipidemia • Certain cancers • Poor performance/function • Poor self-image Incident of overweight is ↑ng Want to “look good”

  4. Body Composition Terminology Depot or storage fat – fat stored in adipose cells as nutritional reserve Essential fats – fats necessary for normal physiologic function

  5. Body Composition Terminology Lean body mass (wt) – body mass minus depot fat Fat free mass (wt) – body mass minus all fat (depot & essential)

  6. Body Composition Relative %age of body weight that is fat & fat-free tissue Lab & field tests vary in complexity, expense

  7. Anthropometry Measurement of the human body

  8. Anthropometry Ht/wt Circumference/girths Skinfolds Hydrostatic weighing Bioelectrical impedance DXA TOBEC X-ray

  9. Body Composition - %Fat Norms Classification Women Men

  10. Body Composition - Tests • Densitometry • Two component model • Fat & fat free mass • Ratio of body mass to body volume (DB=BW/BV) • Body mass determined form body weight • Body volume from under water weighing or plethysmography

  11. Densitometry • Hydrostatic (under water) weighing • Criterion, gold standard

  12. Densitometry • Hydrostatic (under water) weighing • Archimedes’ principle – when a body is immersed in water, it is buoyed by a counterforce equal to the weight of the water displaced • The loss of weight in water, corrected for density of the water, allows calculation of body volume

  13. Densitometry • RV • Density of H2O • Trapped gas in GI tract (100 ml) • Body weight (dry) • Body weight (wet)

  14. Body Composition - Densitometry Body density = weight in air (weight in air – weight in water) – Residual Density of the water volume

  15. Body Composition - Densitometry Body density = bone & muscle more dense than water, fat tissue less dense

  16. Body Composition - Densitometry Plethysmography • air displacement – Δs in pressure in a closed chamber

  17. Bodpod

  18. Body Composition - Densitometry %fat = 457 - 414.2 Body Density %fat = 495 - 450 Body Density

  19. Body Composition – Anthropometric Methods • Height • Weight • Circumferences • Skinfolds

  20. Body Composition – Anthropometric Methods • Reliability & validity • Skill of the measurer • Type of caliper or tape measure • Subject factors related to skinfold compressibility, edema, & variability in fat pattern & distribution • Prediction equation used to estimate fatness

  21. Body Composition – Anthropometric Methods • Body Mass Index (BMI) • Assess weight relative to height • [body weight (kg)/height (m2)] • BMI > 25 – increased health risk • 25.0 to 29.9 = Overweight • > 30 = Obese • See Table 4-1 pg.58 & Table 4-2 pg.59

  22. Body Composition – Anthropometric Methods • Waist-to-hip circumference • Body fat distribution • More fat on trunk (abdominal fat) = greater risk of HTN, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, CAD, premature death • Health risk is high • W/H ratio > 0.94 in young men • W/H ratio > 0.82 in young women • W/H ratio > 1.03 in men 60-69 yrs • W/H ratio > 0.90 in women 60-69 yrs See Box 4-1 & Table 4-3 pgs.60-61 ACSM GET&P

  23. Classification of Disease Risk Based on Body mass Index (BMI) and Waist Circumference (Table4-1) Disease Risk Relative to normal Weight and Waist Circumference

  24. Body Composition – Anthropometric Methods • Skinfolds • Amount of subcutaneous fat is proportional to total body fat

  25. Box 4-2. Standardized Description of Skinfold Sites & Procedures Continued • Procedures • All measurements on the right side of the body • Caliper should be placed 1 cm away from the thumb & finger, perpendicular to the skinfold, & halfway b/n the crest & the base of the fold

  26. Box 4-2. Standardized Description of Skinfold Sites and Procedures Continued • Pinch should be maintained while reading the caliper • Wait 1 to 2 s (& not longer) before reading caliper • Take duplicate measures at each site & retest if duplicate measurements are not w/n 1 to 2 mm • Rotate through measurement sites or allow time for skin to regain normal texture & thickness

  27. Box 4-2. Standardized Description of Skinfold Sites & Procedures • Skinfold Site • Abdominal Vertical fold; 2cm to the right side of the umbilicus • Triceps Vertical fold; on the posterior midline of the upper arm, halfway between the acromion & the olecranon processes, w/ the arm held freely to the side of the body • Biceps Vertical fold; on the anterior aspect of the arm over the belly of the biceps muscle, 1 cm above the level used to mark the triceps site

  28. Box 4-2. Standardized Description of Skinfold Sites & Procedures Continued • Skinfold Site Continued • Chest/Pectoral Diagonal fold; one-half the distance between the anterior axillary line & the nipple (men) or one-third the distance b/n the anterior axillary line & the nipple (women) • Medial Calf Vertical fold; at the maximum circumference of the calf on the midline of its medial border

  29. Box 4-2. Standardized Description of Skinfold Sites & Procedures Continued • Skinfold Site Continued • Midaxillary Vertical fold; on the midaxillary line at the level of the xiphoid process of the sternum (An alternate method is a horizontal fold taken at the level of the xiphoid/sternal in the midaxillary line • Subscapular Diagonal fold (at a 45 angle); 1 to 2 cm below the inferior angle of the scapula

  30. Box 4-2. Standardized Description of Skinfold Sites & Procedures Continued • Suprailiac Diagonal fold; in line w/ the natural angle of the iliac crest taken in the anterior axillary line immediately superior to the iliac crest • Thigh Vertical fold; on the anterior midline of the thigh, midway b/ the proximal border of the patella & the inguinal crease (hip)

  31. Table 4-5. Body Composition (%Body Fat) For Men*

  32. Table 4-6. Body Composition (%Body Fat) For Women*

  33. Body Composition – Other Techniques • Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) • Volume of FFM is proportional to the electrical conductivity of the body • Small electrical current is passed through body • Measures resistance to current • Fat is poor conductor – 14 to 22% water • Lean tissue is good conductor - >90% water • Assumes normal hydration

  34. Body Composition – Other Techniques • Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) • Does not require a high degree of technical skill • More comfortable • Requires minimal cooperation • Intrudes less on privacy

  35. Body Composition – Other Techniques • Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) • Assess total bone mineral, bone, fat, & lean tissues • Uses three component model (fat, solids, water) • Near-infrared interactance (NIR) • Light absorption & reflection • Chemical composition of the body • Accuracy 4 to 11%

  36. Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry

  37. Prediction Equations • Population specific • Derived on homogeneous population • General equations • Diverse, heterogeneous samples that account for differences in age, sex, race, ethnicity, etc.

  38. Prediction Equations • Equation Selection • To whom is the equation applicable • Was equation developed on an appropriate reference model? • Was a representative sample studied? • How were predictor variables measured? • Was the equation cross-validated? • Does equation give accurate estimates? (2.5 to 3.5% - %fat) (2.5 to 3.5 kg – FFM)

More Related