1 / 30

Defining a Neurobehavioural Phenotype in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder

Defining a Neurobehavioural Phenotype in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder. Nash, K., Greenbaum R., Fantus, E., Rovet, J., & Koren, G. What is Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD)?. FASD is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by exposure to alcohol in utero

tanek-buck
Télécharger la présentation

Defining a Neurobehavioural Phenotype in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Defining a Neurobehavioural Phenotype in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder Nash, K., Greenbaum R., Fantus, E., Rovet, J., & Koren, G.

  2. What is Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD)? • FASD is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by exposure to alcohol in utero • Has effects on both brain and behaviour

  3. Diagnostic Criteria Based on a triad of features • Pre and postnatal growth retardation • CNS damage • Characteristic facial dysmorphology

  4. Only a minority of children meet criteria for the full blown syndrome How do we diagnose without visible signs?

  5. The Motherisk Follow-up Clinic Began in 1996 • Provides a specialized diagnosis in a central location Many obstacles exist • Not every child has physical symptoms • Misdiagnosis of ADHD - 70% of children with FASD are diagnosed with ADHD • Long wait lists

  6. The Issue of ADHD • Children with FASD present with a unique and specific behavioural profile compared to children with ADHD (Greenbaum (2004); Fantus et al., (2004))

  7. The Issue of Access • The majority of children with FASD reside in communities with limited access to a specialized diagnosis • How do we address this issue?

  8. Aims of the current research • To identify whether the diagnosis of FASD can be predicted by individual items from a validated questionnaire • To compare children with FASD to children with ADHD and controls on this questionnaire • To develop an empirically derived screening tool (Streissguth, 1998)

  9. Methods Participants: children between the ages of 6-16 years. FASD (dx; n=30) ADHD (dx; n=30): No exposure history Controls (n= 30): No exposure history, LD, ADHD Exposure History (FASD): Confirmed by • Verbal report of biological parent or relative • Knowledge that the child suffered alcohol withdrawal at birth • The child having been place in care because of maternal alcohol abuse

  10. The Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach, 1991) • 113 item parent questionnaire • T-scores yield: • Competence Scales • 3 Broadband scales • 8 Narrowband scales • DSM Oriented Scales

  11. Item selection • Selected only 12 based on the work of Greenbaum (2000)

  12. CBCL: 12 Items • #1 acts to young for his/her age • #3 argues • #8 can’t concentrate/poor attention • # 10 can’t sit still/restless/hyperactive • #16 cruelty/bullying/meanness to others • #22 disobedient at home • #26 no guilt after misbehaving • #41 impulsive/acts without thinking • #43 lying or cheating • #74 showing off/clowning • #81 steals from home • #82 steals outside

  13. Analyses of Data • Frequency Counts • Proportions endorsed per group (chi square) • Endorsement totals per item/group: Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) • Sensitivity and Specificity: Receiver Operating Curves (ROC)

  14. Receiver Operating Curves

  15. CBCL items involving significant group differences(Controls & FASD)

  16. Seven items most strongly differentiating FASD from control • #1 acts to young for his/her age • #8 can’t concentrate/poor attention • #9 can’t sit still/restless/hyperactive • #22 disobedient at home • #26 no guilt after misbehaving • #41 impulsive/acts without thinking • #43 lying or cheating

  17. ROC Analysis:FASD and Controls

  18. CBCL items involving significant group differences(FASD and ADHD)

  19. Six items most strongly differentiating FASD from ADHD • #1 Acts to young for his/her age • #16 cruelty/bullying/meanness to others • #26 no guilt after misbehaving • #43 lying or cheating • #81 steals from home • #82 steals outside

  20. ROC Analysis:FASD and ADHD

  21. Screening checklist for FASD Step 1: Identifying behaviour suggestive of FASD The following questions should be asked of the child’s parent/guardian to determine whether the child’s behaviour is suggestive of FASD

  22. Screening Checklist Continued • Does your child act too young for his/her age? • Does your child have difficulty concentrating and can’t pay attention for long? • Is your child disobedient at home? • Does your child lie or cheat? • Does your child lack guilt after misbehaving? • Does your child act impulsively and without thinking? • Does your child have difficulty sitting still/is restless/hyperactive?

  23. If the parent answers YES to at least 6 out of 7 items this is suggestive of FASD with comorbid ADHD • If the child does NOT exhibit behaviour consistent with ADHD then they must receive a score of 3 out of 4 on the conduct related items

  24. Step 2: Differentiating FASD from ADHD i). The child needs to exhibit 2 of the following 3 • Does your child lack guilt after misbehaving? • Does your child act cruel, bully or is mean to others? • Does your child act young for his/her age? OR ii). 3 of the following 6 • Does your child lack guilt after misbehaving? • Does you child act cruel, bully or is mean to others? • Does your child act young for his/her age? • Does your child steal from outside the home? • Does your child steal from home? • Does your child lie and cheat?

  25. Clinical Implications • Address the issue of access • Spare the long wait times for a diagnosis • Misdiagnosis of ADHD

  26. Limitations • Dose and timing of alcohol exposure • Confounders • Small sample size • Clinic referred

  27. Future Directions • Compare to children diagnosed with conduct disorder • Replicate and empirically validate • Neuroimaging and mapping

  28. Acknowledgments • Rovet Lab: Meagan Williamson, Dina Lafoyannis, Sarah Borokowski, Erin Sheard, Dr. Mary Desrocher, Darlene Walker • Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR)

More Related