1 / 1

Critical Factors: Critical Factor 1: Exception

tannar
Télécharger la présentation

Critical Factors: Critical Factor 1: Exception

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. 1 Are requisitions submitted with the correct codes? 4 (Chapter 9 of MCO P4400.82F, and paragraph 6.7e(4), Section 6, Part III and pages 4-4-12 and 4-4-13, Section 4, Part IV of UM 4400-124) 2 Is the unit reviewing and taking required actions to correct issues identified on management reports (MAL/DASF/LUBF) and Exception Reports, (TAMCN/LUAF/RUAF/LUBF) Unmatched NSN and Edit Error listings)? paragraph 1.2.3, Section 1, Part III and pages 4-4-51 and 4-4-67, Section 4, Part IV of UM 4400-124 4 paragraph 1.2.3, Section 1, Part III and pages 4-4-51 and 4-4-67, Section 4, Part IV of UM 4400-124 3 Is the unit managing assets listed as on hand on the LUBF? 2,5,6 (paragraph 3.1, Section 3, Part III of UM 4400-124) 4 Are aged materiel shipments (lost shipments) processed when required? 1,4, 5-8 paragraph 2004.6.f.(4) of MCO P4400-150E; paragraph 2.10B(2)(a)3 of Section 2, Part III of UM 4400-124 5 Are cancellations, inquiries, follow-ups and modifiers submitted to the last known supply source? 1,4 (paragraphs 3001.4f, 3001.4g, 3001.4h, and 3001.6b of MCO P4400.150E; paragraphs 4.6, 4.7 and 4.8, Section 4, Part III of UM 4400-124, and paragraph 04001.6 of UM 4400-15) 6 When materiel is received, are materiel receipt transactions processed and/or backorders released as appropriate? 3,4 (paragraph 3001.1 of MCO P4400.150E, paragraph 9.b(7), Enclosure (1) and Table 1-2 of MCO 4400.16G, and paragraph 5.2, Section 5, Part III of UM 4400-124; CMC msg 220104Z JAN 98, ALMAR 029/98) 6(a) Is the information in the current Department of Defense Activity Address Directory (DODAAD) correct? If not, has the unit submitted a change request to COMMARCORLOGBASES, Albany, GA (Code 802-1) as required? 2 (paragraph 6 of MCO 4420.4H) 7 Are excess dues (due-in quantities without a corresponding backorder) properly managed? 4 (paragraph 3001.4h of MCO P4400.150E; and paragraph 5.1.3d, Section 5, Part III of UM 4400-124) 8 Are reconciliations being accomplished between supply and commodity representatives at least every two weeks for OPFOR units and on a monthly basis for supporting establishments? 2 (paragraph 3001.6 of MCO P4400.150E, and paragraph 5.1.3a, Section 5, Part III of UM 4400-124) GAP The demand history regarding scrounges, PEB replemishes, and warranty parts are not being captured in SASSY. Currently LMT-E is conducted test to validate gap. 1 Are requisitions submitted with the correct codes? 4 (Chapter 9 of MCO P4400.82F, and paragraph 6.7e(4), Section 6, Part III and pages 4-4-12 and 4-4-13, Section 4, Part IV of UM 4400-124) 2 Is the unit reviewing and taking required actions to correct issues identified on management reports (MAL/DASF/LUBF) and Exception Reports, (TAMCN/LUAF/RUAF/LUBF) Unmatched NSN and Edit Error listings)? paragraph 1.2.3, Section 1, Part III and pages 4-4-51 and 4-4-67, Section 4, Part IV of UM 4400-124 4 paragraph 1.2.3, Section 1, Part III and pages 4-4-51 and 4-4-67, Section 4, Part IV of UM 4400-124 3 Is the unit managing assets listed as on hand on the LUBF? 2,5,6 (paragraph 3.1, Section 3, Part III of UM 4400-124) 4 Are aged materiel shipments (lost shipments) processed when required? 1,4, 5-8 paragraph 2004.6.f.(4) of MCO P4400-150E; paragraph 2.10B(2)(a)3 of Section 2, Part III of UM 4400-124 5 Are cancellations, inquiries, follow-ups and modifiers submitted to the last known supply source? 1,4 (paragraphs 3001.4f, 3001.4g, 3001.4h, and 3001.6b of MCO P4400.150E; paragraphs 4.6, 4.7 and 4.8, Section 4, Part III of UM 4400-124, and paragraph 04001.6 of UM 4400-15) 6 When materiel is received, are materiel receipt transactions processed and/or backorders released as appropriate? 3,4 (paragraph 3001.1 of MCO P4400.150E, paragraph 9.b(7), Enclosure (1) and Table 1-2 of MCO 4400.16G, and paragraph 5.2, Section 5, Part III of UM 4400-124; CMC msg 220104Z JAN 98, ALMAR 029/98) 6(a) Is the information in the current Department of Defense Activity Address Directory (DODAAD) correct? If not, has the unit submitted a change request to COMMARCORLOGBASES, Albany, GA (Code 802-1) as required? 2 (paragraph 6 of MCO 4420.4H) 7 Are excess dues (due-in quantities without a corresponding backorder) properly managed? 4 (paragraph 3001.4h of MCO P4400.150E; and paragraph 5.1.3d, Section 5, Part III of UM 4400-124) 8 Are reconciliations being accomplished between supply and commodity representatives at least every two weeks for OPFOR units and on a monthly basis for supporting establishments? 2 (paragraph 3001.6 of MCO P4400.150E, and paragraph 5.1.3a, Section 5, Part III of UM 4400-124) GAP The demand history regarding scrounges, PEB replemishes, and warranty parts are not being captured in SASSY. Currently LMT-E is conducted test to validate gap.

More Related