80 likes | 215 Vues
This paper explores the complexities surrounding humanitarian aid in conflict zones, emphasizing the moral ambiguities inherent in providing assistance. It highlights examples such as the 1994 Rwandan refugee crisis, where aid played dual roles—offering support to displaced persons while potentially empowering militant factions. The work of aid groups must be critically assessed to recognize their non-neutral positions and the consequences of their actions. Strategies for navigating these dilemmas are discussed, stressing the importance of aligning humanitarian efforts with security considerations.
E N D
The Humanitarian Aid Dilemma IAFS 1000
Final Paper • Due April 22 at beginning of class • Submit to turnitin.com by 11:59pm on Apr 22
Final Quiz • Covers everything since midterm • Format: —2 IDs (50 points each)
Humanitarian Aid • Giving to needy = good • E.g. zakat • Aid groups • impartial • neutral • Sarah Lischer • aid has pol, & sometimes mil, repercussions • can even exacerbate conflict Lischer, “Collateral Damage” Intl Security 28:1 (Summer 2003) 79-109
Mechanisms • Feed militants • Sustain militants’ supporters • Contribute resources for violence • Legitimize combatants
Rwandan Refugees in Zaire • 1994: ~2m Hutus fled to E. Zaire (now DRC) • 10,000s of perpetrators • State in exile • Dallaire and Wilkens on collaboration
What Should Aid Groups Do? • Recognize that their work is not neutral • Assets: • moral clout • tangible assets >>> divert attention to security situation >>> consider pulling out
What to Do? • Acknowledge moral ambiguity • Consider charity for improving security • Don’t despair! (Dallaire, Shake Hands xviii)