1 / 30

Verification of applicability of the validated/compendial API analytical method for the final formulation (assay, dissol

Verification of applicability of the validated/compendial API analytical method for the final formulation (assay, dissolution test and degradants). Guidelines. ICH Q2A Validation of Analytical Methods: Definitions and Terminology (CPMP/ICH/381/95) ICH Q2B

tareq
Télécharger la présentation

Verification of applicability of the validated/compendial API analytical method for the final formulation (assay, dissol

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Verification of applicability of the validated/compendialAPI analytical methodfor the final formulation(assay, dissolution test and degradants) Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  2. Guidelines • ICH Q2A • Validation of Analytical Methods: Definitions and Terminology (CPMP/ICH/381/95) • ICH Q2B • Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology (CPMP/ICH/281/95) • ICH Q6A • Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for New Drug Substances and New Drug Products: Chemical Substances(CPMP/ICH/367/96 corr) Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  3. API • Assay • Validation with respect to: • Specificity, linearity/range, accuracy, precision, robustness • Impurities • Validation with respect to: • Specificity, linearity/range, accuracy, precision, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantitation (LOQ), robustness Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  4. FPP • New situation arising from the formulation of the drug product • Presence of further APIs • Presence of excipients (individual formulation) • Presence of known impurities/degradants of all APIs and potential new degradants or incompatibility products Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  5. Requirements • Capability of the analytical method(s): • Assay of each API in the presence of the other APIs and all impurities/degradants • Assay of each degradant in the presence of all APIs and all other degradants/impurities • Influence of formulation components should be excluded/controlled Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  6. Revalidation I • Revalidation of analytical methods with respect to: • Specificity • presence of new API(s) and impurities/degradants/formulation components • Range • test concentrations of API(s) versus FPP • Accuracy • influence of formulation components • Precision • influence of formulation and sample preparation • LOD/LOQ • test concentrations of API(s) versus FPP) • Robustness • change of column material, column parameters, solvents) Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  7. Revalidation II • Revalidation reflected by ICH Q2A: • Revalidation may be necessary in the following circumstances: • Changes in the synthesis of the drug substance • Changes in the composition of the finished product • Changes in the analytical procedure • (e.g. robustness) Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  8. Specificity • Identification • Discrimination between compounds of closely related structures • positive results (from samples containing the analyte) • negative results (from samples that do not contain the analyte) • components structurally similar to the analyte do not give positive results Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  9. Specificity II • Assay and impurities • Chromatographic procedures • Representative chromatograms with appropriate labelling of individual components • Investigation at an appropriate level Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  10. Specificity III • Assay and impurities/degradants • Discrimination of analytes where impurities/degradants are available • Assay • Demonstration of discrimination of the analyte in the presence of all impurities/degradants and/or excipients • f. ex. assay result unaffected by presence of spiked impurities/degradants Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  11. Specificity IV • Assay and impurities/degradants • Discrimination of analytes where impurities/degradants are available • Impurities/Degradants • Demonstration of separation of impurities/degradants individually and/or from excipients • f. ex. spiking of API with appropriate levels of impurities/degradants and/or excipients Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  12. Specificity V • Assay and impurities/degradants • Discrimination of analytes where impurities/degradants are not available • Comparison of the test procedure to a second well-characterized (independent) procedure • Samples • Test samples containing impurities/degradants • Test samples stored under relevant stress conditions (potential degradants arising during shelf life) Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  13. Specificity VI • Assay and impurities/degradants • Discrimination of analytes where impurities/degradants are not available • Assay • Comparison of test results by the two independent procedures • Impurities/Degradants • Comparison of impurity profiles • Peak purity assessment • Demonstration that the analyte peak is attributable to only one component Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  14. Example • FDC (artesunate and amodiaquine) • One analytical method for both APIs • Capability of one method to quantify both APIs and to separate/discriminate the other API and its impurities/degradants and potential incompatibility products from the existing API and its impurities/degradants • Some reference material for impurities/degradants will be available (spiking experiments applicable) • Other degradants are not available as reference material (stress testing necessary to generate in situ degradants) Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  15. Range • Minimum specified ranges • Assay • 80 – 120% of the test concentration • Content uniformity • 70 – 130% of the test concentration • Dissolution • Q-20% - 120% • Impurities/Degradants • Reporting level to 120% of specification limit • Revalidation is necessary, if the ranges covered during validation of the API-methods are different from those of the FPP-methods(different test concentrations) Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  16. Accuracy • Assay • Application of the analytical procedure to synthetic mixtures of the product components (placebo mixture) to which known quantities of the analyte have been added • In case certain product components are unavailable: • Application of the analytical procedure to the product to which known quantities of the analyte have been added • Comparison of results obtained by a second (independent) procedure with defined accuracy Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  17. Accuracy II • Impurities/Degradants • Assessment of samples spiked with known amounts of impurities/degradants • In case certain impurities/degradation products are unavailable • Comparison of results obtained by a second (independent) procedure with defined accuracy Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  18. Precision • Assay and impurities/degradants • Repeatability • 9 determinations (3 x 3) covering the specified rangeor • 6 determinations at 100% of the test concentration • Intermediate precision • Effects of random events on the precision of the procedure, e.g. • Days • Analysts • Equipment • To be performed with a test solution prepared from the drug product Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  19. Detection Limit • Determination based on • Visual evaluation (non-instrumental and instrumental methods) • Signal to Noise (baseline noise) • Standard deviation of response (s) andslope (S) • DL=3.3s/S • Estimation of S • from the calibration curve of the analyte • Estimation of s • from the standard deviation of the blank • from the standard deviation (regression line or y-intercept) of a calibration curve in the range of the DL Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  20. Quantitation Limit • Determination based on • Visual evaluation (non-instrumental and instrumental methods) • Signal to Noise (baseline noise) • Standard deviation of response (s) andslope (S) • QL=10s/S • Estimation of S • from the calibration curve of the analyte • Estimation of s • from the standard deviation of the blank • from the standard deviation (regression line or y-intercept) of a calibration curve in the range of the QL Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  21. Robustness I • Reliability of an analysis with respect to deliberate variations in method parameters • Susceptibility to variations in analytical conditions? • control of analytical conditionsorprecautionary statement • establishment of system suitability parameters Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  22. Robustness II • Examples of variations • Stability of analytical solutions • Extraction time • In the case of liquid chromatography • Influence of variations of pH in a mobile phase • Influence of variations in mobile phase composition • Influence of columns (different lots and/or suppliers) • Influence of temperature • Influence of flow rate • In the case of gas chromatography • Influence of columns (different lots and/or suppliers) • Influence of temperature • Influence of flow rate Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  23. Dissolution • Applicability of the analytical method used for assay and impurities/degradants • Sample preparation • Range • Applicability of the dissolution method • Appropriateness of drug releaseacceptance criteria • Solubility criteria of the APIs • Appropriateness of test conditionsandacceptance criteria • Dissolution affecting bioavailability • Changes in formulation or manufacturing variables affecting dissolution Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  24. Dissolution II • Applicability of the analytical method used for assay and impurities/degradants • Potential parameters for revalidation • Sample preparation • Stability of analytes in the dissolution medium? • Preparation of an injectable sample volume according to the analytical method? • Precision of analysis of the prepared dissolution sample? • Range of test concentrations of API / impurities / degradants according to the validated ranges? • Test concentration of prepared dissolution sample versus test concentration of FPP sample Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  25. Dissolution III • Applicability of the dissolution method • Appropriateness of drug release acceptance criteria • Solubility of the APIs (ICH Q6A Definitions) • Rapidly dissolving products • Not less than 80% of the label amount of the drug substance dissolves within 15 minutes in each of the following media: pH 1.2, pH 4.0, pH 6.8 • Highly water soluble drugs • Drugs with a dose/solubility volume of less than or equal to 250 ml over a pH range of 1.2 to 6.8 • Low solubility drugs • Drugs with a dose/solubility volume of more than250 ml Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  26. Dissolution IV • Appropriateness of drug release acceptance criteria • Solubility of the APIs • Problem with low solubility drugs: • Solution of the drugs may become a time-limiting step • Dissolution also dependent on the strength of the drug product • Dissolution test cannot reflect batch to batch consistency • Possible solution of the problem • Extending the dissolution volume beyond the time-limiting volume • Validation of the dissolution procedure with extended volume (applicability of the pharmacopoeial procedure) Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  27. Dissolution V • Applicability of the dissolution method • Appropriateness of test conditions and acceptance criteria (ICH Q6A) • Dissolution significantly affecting bioavailability • Have relevant developmental batches exhibited unacceptable bioavailability? • Development of test conditions and acceptance criteria which can distinguish batches with unacceptable bioavailability • Changes in formulation or manufacturing variables affecting dissolution • Control of these changes by another procedure and acceptance criterionor • Development of test conditions and acceptance criteria which can distinguish these changes Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  28. Deficiencies from prequalification • Validation of precision • Precision of the drug substance solution lower than precision of the drug product solution • Acceptance criteria for precision of the drug substance solution wider than for precision of the drug product solution • Acceptance criteria much wider than real values assessed • Acceptance criteria of assay specifications and precision do not match • (3 x RSD outside the specification range) Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  29. Deficiencies from prequalification II • Assay of API and impurities/degradants • No acceptable mass balance found between assay of API and impurities/degradants • Quantitation limit of impurities too high • ICH requirement on threshold for identification and qualification of unknown impurities cannot be fulfilled Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

  30. Deficiencies from prequalification III • Dissolution • Necessary information on development of dissolution test not presented • Dissolution method (pharmacopoeial) not presented along with development of dissolution test and/or validation of applicability of analytical methods • Test conditions and acceptance criteria of the dissolution test not justified Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn

More Related