230 likes | 365 Vues
This course explores performance evaluation using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) within service management contexts. Students will analyze the productivity of different service sites, such as bank branches, utilizing various inputs and outputs. Key assignments include a case study on Nashville National Bank due May 14, where students will critique Ann's analysis, propose redesigns, and conduct a DEA analysis using Excel Solver to report efficiencies. The lab class on May 12 will provide hands-on experience with these concepts.
E N D
Koç University OPSM 405 Service Management Class 23: Performance Evaluation: Introduction to DEA Zeynep Aksin zaksin@ku.edu.tr
Announcement • Class on Monday May 12 will be held in the lab SOS Z12 • Last case assignment due Wednesday May 14: Nashville National Bank
Last case assignment • Answer the questions: • Do you agree with Ann’s analysis? Why or why not? • If you were to redesign the analysis, what inputs and outputs would you use? Why? Explain specifically. You can also suggest new alternatives. • What are the strengths and weaknesses of this analysis? • Now take an appropriate subset of the inputs and outputs used by Ann and perform a DEA analysis using Excel Solver. Report efficiencies of the units and values of the optimal input and output weights you have chosen.
Performance Evaluation • Services are provided through multiple sites • Each site provides similar services • Example: branches of a bank, Starbucks stores • As managers we want to understand • How each site is performing… • Who performs better… • Who performs worse…
Productivity measurement • Operating ratios (e.g. man-hr/transaction) • Financial approaches (e.g. conversion to Euros)
Conceptually ... Productivity = Outputs Inputs Productivity
A graphical view: who is efficient? 3 4 6 2 7 5 Inputs Outputs 1 2 1 2 4 5 3 7 7 4 9 7 5 5 3 6 10 6 7 4.5 4.5 1
Traditional efficiency: who is efficient? 3 4 6 2 7 5 1 Inputs Outputs Ratio 1 2 1 0.5 2 4 5 1.25 3 7 7 1.0 4 9 7 0.77 5 5 3 0.6 6 10 6 0.6 7 4.5 4.5 1.0
Frontier efficiency: who is efficient? 3 4 2 6 7 5 Inputs Outputs 1 2 1 2 4 5 3 7 7 4 9 7 5 5 3 6 10 6 7 4.5 4.5 1
Conceptually ... Productivity = Outputs Inputs Productivity Reality is more complex ... Inputs Outputs Technology + Decision Making equipment #type A cust. facility space #type B cust. server labor quality index mgmt. labor $ oper. profit
Operating Units Differ • Mix of customers served • Availability and cost of inputs • Facility configuration • Processes/practices used • Examples • bank branches, retail stores, clinics, schools, etc. Questions: • How do we compare productivity of a diverse set of operating units serving a diverse set of markets? • What are the “best practice” and under-performing units? • What are the trade-offs among inputs and outputs? • Where are the improvement opportunities and how big are they?
Extending to multiple outputs ... Ex: Consider 8 M.D.’s working at an hospital for the same 160 hrs. in a month. Each performs exams and surgeries. Which ones are most “productive”? There is some “efficient” trade-off between the number of surgeries and exams that any one M.D. can do in a month, but what is it?
#6 #1 Scatter plot of outputs: efficient frontier These points are dominated by #1 and #6. “Pareto-Koopman efficiency” along the frontier - cannot increase an output (or decrease an input) without compensating decrease in other outputs (or increase in other inputs).
Performance “gap” 73.4% of distance to frontier How bad are the inefficient M.D.s and where are the gaps? #5 Efficiency score = 73.4%
DEA uses an efficient frontier to define multiple I/O productivity • Frontier defines the (observed) efficient trade-off among inputs and outputs within a set of DMUs. • Relative distance to the frontier defines efficiency • “Nearest point” on frontier defines an efficient comparison unit (hypothetical comparison unit (HCU)) • Differences in inputs and output between DMU and HCU define productivity “gaps” (improvement potential) How do we do this analysis systematically?
DEA: basic assumptions • Multiple units • Common inputs and outputs • can be quantitative or qualitative measures • do not need to have market valuation • however need consistency • include environmental factors to capture differences… • … yet not too many to ensure effective discrimination
DEA: the basic idea • One input, one output: • efficiency = output / input • multiple inputs, multiple outputs: • efficiency = weighted sum of outputs / weighted sum of inputs • how do you determine the weights • ad-hoc techniques • DEA: LP; assume each unit has its own value system • a strictly relative notion of efficiency
How does it work? For each unit solve: max my unit’s efficiency st. efficiency score for all other units < 1 by varying my weights on inputs and outputs where: efficiency = sum of weighted outputs sum of weighted inputs
In words • Imagine your own unit • You are searching over all possible weights • You stop either when your own unit’s efficiency is 1: you are efficient • Or when with the selected weights one or more of the other units have reached efficiency 1: you are inefficient • In latter case: the other units with efficiency 1 constitute your peer (reference) group • Linear programming is a systematic way of performing the above described search
How do we evaluate these variables ? LP Formulation: Data Model variables
Another way of saying the same thing max my unit’s weighted outputs st. weighted outputs < weighted inputs or (weighted outputs - weighted inputs < 0) my weighted sum of inputs = 1 by varying my weights on inputs and outputs where: efficiency = sum of weighted outputs sum of weighted inputs