1 / 28

Matching (in case control studies)

Matching (in case control studies). James Stuart, Fernando Simón EPIET Dublin, 2006. Remember confounding…. Confounding factor is variable independently associated with exposure of interest outcome that distorts measurement of association. Control of confounders. In the study design

tate
Télécharger la présentation

Matching (in case control studies)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Matching(in case control studies) James Stuart, Fernando Simón EPIET Dublin, 2006

  2. Remember confounding… Confounding factor is variable independently associated with • exposure of interest • outcome that distorts measurement of association

  3. Control of confounders In the study design • Restriction • Matching In the analysis • Stratification • Multivariate analysis

  4. Control of confounders In the study design • Restriction • Matching In the analysis • Stratification • Multivariate analysis

  5. Matching Selection of controls to match specific characteristics of cases • Frequency matching Select controls to get same distribution of variable as cases (e.g. age group) • Individual matching Select a specific control per case by matching variable (e.g. date of birth)

  6. … but matching introduces bias because controls are no longer representative of source population

  7. to remove this selection bias • Stratify analysis by matching criteria matched design matched analysis • Can not study the effect of matching variables on the outcome

  8. a) Frequency matching useful if distribution of cases for a confounding variable differs markedly from distribution of that variable in source population

  9. a) Frequency matching Age Cases (years) 0-14 50 15-29 30 30-44 15 45+ 5 TOTAL 100

  10. a) Frequency matching Age Cases Controls (years) unmatched 0-14 50 20 15-29 30 20 30-44 15 20 45+ 5 40 TOTAL 100 100

  11. a) Frequency matching Age Cases Controls (years) unmatched matched 0-14 50 10 50 15-29 30 25 30 30-44 15 25 15 45+ 5 40 5 TOTAL 100 100 100

  12. a) Frequency matching: analysis • Mantel-Haenszel Odds Ratio (weighted) • Conditional logistic regression for multiple variables

  13. a) Frequency matching: analysis • keep stratification by age group 0-14 years Exposed Cases Controls Total Yes 45(a) 30(b) 75 No 5(c) 20(d) 25 Total 50 50 100(ni)

  14. a) Frequency matching: analysis 15-29 years Exposed Cases Controls Total Yes 15(a) 4(b) 19 No 15(c) 26(d) 41 Total 30 30 60(ni) same process for each age group

  15. b) individual matching Each pair could be considered one stratum 4 possible outcomes per pair Exposure + - Case 1 0 Control 1 0

  16. b) individual matching Each pair could be considered one stratum 4 possible outcomes per pair Exposure + - + - Case 1 0 1 0 Control 1 0 0 1

  17. b) individual matching Each pair could be considered one stratum 4 possible outcomes per pair Exposure + - + - + - Case 1 0 1 0 0 1 Control 1 0 0 1 0 1

  18. b) individual matching Each pair can be considered as one stratum 4 possible outcomes per pair Exposure + - + - + - + - Case 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 Control 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ad = zero unless case exposed, control not exposed bc = zero unless control exposed, case not exposed

  19. b) individual matching The only pairs that contribute to OR are discordant ORMH=sum of discordant pairs where case exposed sum of discordant pairs where control exposed

  20. b) individual matching If change way of presenting case and control data to show in pairs Controls Exposed Unexposed Exposed e f (ad=1) Cases Unexposed g (bc = 1) h ORMH =sum of discordant pairs where case exposed sum of discordant pairs where control exposed = f/g

  21. b) individual matching: for n controls each set analysed in pairs case used in as many pairs as number of controls CaseControl1Control2Control3Control4 C+/Ctr-C-/Ctr+ + - + - - 3 0 + + - + + 1 0 - - - - - 0 0 + - - - + 3 0 - - + - - 0 1 + - + + + 1 0 + + + + + 0 0 Total......................................................................... 8 1 pairs case exp/control not8 pairs case not/control exp 1 OR= = = 8

  22. Matched study: example • 20 cases of cryptosporidiosis • Hypothesis: associated with attendance at local swimming pool • 2 matched studies conducted (i) controls from same general practice and nearest date of birth (ii) case nominated (friend) controls

  23. Analysis: GP and age matched controls swimming pool exposure Controls + - + 1 15 Cases - 1 3 OR = f/g = 15/1 = 15.0

  24. Analysis: friend controls swimming pool exposure Controls + - + 13 3 Cases - 1 3 OR = 3/1 = 3.0

  25. Why do matched studies? • Random sample may not be possible • Quick and easy way to get controls • Improves efficiency of study (smaller sample size) • Can control for confounding due to factors that are difficult to measure or even for unknown confounders.

  26. Disadvantages of matching • Cannot examine risks associated with matching variable • If no controls identified, more likely if too many matching variables, lose case data and vice versa • Overmatching on exposure of interest will bias OR towards 1 • May be residual confounding in frequency matching

  27. Over-matching • exposure to the risk factor of interest • under-estimates true association • may fail to find true association

  28. Key points • Matching controls for confounding factors in study design • Matched design matched analysis • Matching for variables that are not confounders complicates design • Frequency matching simpler than individual • Multivariable analysis reduces need to match

More Related