240 likes | 325 Vues
Achievable Penetration Rates. The Pace of Conservation Acquisition April 17, 2009 Conservation Resources Advisory Committee. Outline in Two Parts. Part 1 Revisions to Ramp Rate Assumptions. Part 2 Sensitivity Testing. Based on Comments & Further Thought.
E N D
Achievable Penetration Rates The Pace of Conservation Acquisition April 17, 2009 Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
Outline in Two Parts • Part 1 • Revisions to Ramp Rate Assumptions • Part 2 • Sensitivity Testing
Based on Comments & Further Thought Revisions: Tamping Down Max Annual Rates
Slowed down two important new measures: From New Measure - Fast to New Measure - Medium Energy Project Management Integrated Plant Energy Management Represent about 20% of industrial savings Revisions: Industrial
Formerly All at “New Measure - Medium” Now: Split by Measure Bundle System Voltage by LDC method at New Measure - Fast System Voltage EOL method at New Measure - Slow Light System Improvements at New Measure - Slow Major System Improvements at New Measure - Slow Revisions: Distribution Efficiency
Measure 30-Mar Previous LPD Package-New LO 20Fast LO Fast LPD Package-NR LO 20Fast LO Fast Lighting Controls Interior-New LO Medium LO Fast Lighting Controls Interior-NR LO Medium LO Fast Glass-Retro Retro in 20 Retro in 10 Demand Control Ventilation-NR LO Slow LO Medium Roof Insulation-NR LO Fast Retro in 10 Computer Servers and IT-Retro LO Slow LO Medium Street and Roadway Lighting-NR LO Slow LO Medium Revisions: Commercial
Residential • Consumer Electronics • New analysis adds 1000 MWa Potential over 20 years • LO Medium Ramp Rate ~ 30 MWa per year by 2014 • Heat Pump Water Heater • Emerging Technology Ramp Rate
Reality Check • Achieved over 200 MWa in 2007 • Expect higher in 2008 • Most programs exceed 2007 & NEEA too • Of the 200 MWa about 70 MWa was CFLs • But CFL savings not in 6th Plan targets • Many New Measures • Higher Avoided Costs • Federal Standards Push • State Code Revisions in the Works
5th Plan Targets Seemed Daunting 5th Plan Targets (130 to 150 MWa) Historic Performance
Part 2: Ramp Rate Sensitivity Testing • Purpose: • What is the Value of Going Faster? • What is the Cost of Going Slower? • What are the Resource Consequences? • What are the Revenue Requirements? • Tool: Portfolio Model • Test Slow & Fast Achievable Penetration • Issue: What Ranges?
Ramp Rate Sensitivity TestingStaff Proposal • Lost-Opportunity • SLOW: Up to $60 / MWh levelized cost • FAST: Up to $120 / MWh levelized cost • Non-Lost-Opportunity • SLOW: 5th Plan Rate • FAST: Washington I-937 rate • All Cost-Effective in 10 years – evenly paced
Test Slow & Fast Deployment Rates Proposed Annual Maximum Limits on Deployment in MWa
Cumulative Deployment Rate for Non-Lost Opportunity Resources