1 / 34

Dr Gerhard Coetzer 1999061854 Patient No 1 – 2012 Patella Tendinosis

Dr Gerhard Coetzer 1999061854 Patient No 1 – 2012 Patella Tendinosis. COMPLAINT. 26 Year old male patient complaining of pain in his left knee. Pain present when running. FURTHER HISTORY. He is a recreational athlete training for the Iron Man 70.3 Triathlon.

Télécharger la présentation

Dr Gerhard Coetzer 1999061854 Patient No 1 – 2012 Patella Tendinosis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dr Gerhard Coetzer1999061854Patient No 1 – 2012Patella Tendinosis

  2. COMPLAINT • 26 Year old male patient complaining of pain in his left knee. • Pain present when running.

  3. FURTHER HISTORY • He is a recreational athlete training for the Iron Man 70.3 Triathlon. • Complaining of pain after approximately 5 – 10 minutes of running. • Pain is sever enough to make patient stop. • Pain is anterior and inferior to the Patella. • Complaining of calf pain before knee pain starts • What changed?? • Started running longer and harder

  4. FURTHER HISTORY (cont) • BMI of 18 • No medical history • No family history • Previous rugby injury to left knee with lateral collateral ligament sprain (2000)

  5. CLINICAL EXAMINATION • Full range of movement of left knee. • No visible effusion. • Painful palpation of the inferior pole of the patella. • Pain with Hot Test • All ligaments intact • Negative Grind Test

  6. CLINICAL EXAMINATION (cont) • Differential Diagnosis • PFJ pain • Patellar tendinosis • Partial tear of Patellar tendon • Did McConnel taping, patient still had pain with functional exercise. • PFJ excluded. • Did Ultra Sound, no partial tear found.

  7. SPECIAL INVESTIGATION • Ultra Sound done • MRI scan not done • Although these are the recommended test, the tests do not have 100% sensitivity and specificity for Patellar Tendinosis.

  8. 3 STAGE SUMMARY • Clinical • Patient presenting of 2 week history of pain in the anterior aspect of the knee • Personal • Patient is scared that he will have to pull out of the race due to pain • Forfeit R1 300, 00 entry fee • Contextual • 26 year old recreational athlete with Patellar Tendonitis 3 weeks before Iron Man 70.3

  9. PROBLEM LIST • Active • Reduce pain, reduce load and analgesia for pain relief. • Passive • Starting a rehabilitation programme for the patient after the race.

  10. PLAN • Avoid aggravating activity • Analgesia for pain • Not enough time for rehabilitation before the race

  11. PROGRESSION • Patient completed the race but with severe pain and difficulty. • Rested patient for a week after the race. • Pain settled, moved to the lateral joint line of left knee on re-examination. • Final diagnosis- Lateral meniscus tear

  12. DISCUSSION

  13. DISCUSSION • Patellar Tendinitis is not an inflammatory reaction, but rather a degenerative tendinitis and should be referred to as Patellar Tendinosis.

  14. ANATOMY • Macroscopic • Normal tendon is seen as white and glistening • The tendon of Patellar Tendinopathy has a soft, yellow brown tissue adjacent to the lower pole, called mucoid degeneration.

  15. CLINICAL FEATURES • It is important to reproduce the patients pain with examination. • Must differentiate between PFJ and Tendinosis • Another aid is the VISA questionnaire.

  16. SPECIAL INVESTIGATION • Diagnostic Ultra sound and MRI are the investigation of choice. • These tests do not have 100% sensitivity and specificity for the condition. • Ultra sound you look for neo-vascularisation and increased diameter of the Patellar Tendon.

  17. STRENGTHENING EXERCISE • Prof Jill Cook from Australia says to treat any tendinopathy you must first load the tendon and get it strong. • Different types of exercise has been tried • A recent study that was published reported a 60% VAS and 86%VISA score improvement (Romero-Rodriguez et al, 2010).

  18. LOAD REDUCTION • Load reduction can be done through decreasing the amount of jumping per session or by reducing the sessions per week(Brukner P, Khan K, 2008).

  19. CORRECT BIOMECHANICS • Correct Biomechanics is also necessary to improve Patellar Tendinopathy. • Decreased range of motion in the ankle can contribute to Patellar Tendinopathy because the calf absorbs +- 40% of the loading energy. • Biomechanical analysis must include both functional and anatomical abnormalities.

  20. SOFT TISSUE THERAPY • Although there is insufficient evidence to show that Soft Tissue Therapy is effective, it is still a popular choice of treatment. • It includes transverse friction, digital ischemic pressure and miofacial release. • A study by Alessandro Pedrelli, suggested that pain can be significantly reduced after miofacial manipulation of the quadriceps muscle facia(Pedrelli et al, 2009).

  21. SOFT TISSUE THERAPY (cont) • Extra-corporeal shock wave therapy is also being sued for the treatment of Patellar Tendinosis. • There is still no conclusive evidence that I am aware of that it improves the condition, but the pilot study published by Zwerver in 2010, concluded that there was a good reduction in pain(Zwerver et al, 2010).

  22. PHARMACOTHERAPY • Iontophoresis with cortisone improve outcome phonophoresis. • There seems to be some evidence that suggest that sclerosing injections significantly improves pain in patients with long standing Tendinopathy(Kampa & Connell, 2010). • In a case study by Brown and Sivan , ultra sound guided platelet rich injections also improved symptoms(Brown & Sivan, 2010). • 2 other studies reported an 80% reduction in pain

  23. SURGERY • There is currently no evidence that surgical intervention provides a better outcome than conservative treatment. • Surgery is not a quick fix. • Surgery is only indicated after quality conservative treatment has failed. • Although surgery will alleviate symptoms, the patient is unlikely to return to previous level of competition. (60% - 80% likelihood)

  24. LEARNING EXPERIENCE • It is important to differentiate PFJ pain and Patellar Tendinosis. • Ultra sound can be helpful in the diagnosis. • There is no quick fix and the patient should be made aware of the duration of the rehabilitation. • Must be able to reproduce patient symptoms during examination.

  25. THANK YOU

  26. REFERENCES • Zwervera J, Dekkera F, Pepping G. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 2010, Vol 23, pg 111–115. • Kampa RJ, Connell DA. Treatment of tendinopathy: is there a role for autologous whole blood and platelet rich plasma injection, IJCP, International Journal of Clinical Practice, 2010, Vol 64 & 13, pg 1813–1823. • Pedrelli A, Stecco C, Day JA. Treating patellar tendinopathy with FascialManipulation, Journal of Body work and Movement Therapies,2009, Vol 13, pg73–80. • Brown J, Sivan M. Ultrasound-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Injection for Chronic Patellar Tendinopathy: A Case Report, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2010, Vol 2, pg 969-972. • Romero-Rodriguez D, Gual G, Tesch PA. Efficacy of an inertial resistance training paradigm in the treatment of patellar tendinopathyin athletes: A case-series study, Physical Therapy in Sport, 2011, Vol 12, pg 43-48. • Brukner P, Khan K. Clinical Sports Medicine, 2008, Vol 3, pg508 – 532.

More Related