SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Choosing features

tausiq avatar
tausiq
5 diapositives · 182 Views · Jul 15, 2014

This paper by Dieter Wunderlich addresses Kiparsky's 2000 work on complex case marking in Finnish, highlighting the nuances of structural case within imperative and passive constructions. Wunderlich examines examples demonstrating how the genitive case is affected in specific syntactic environments. The study employs machine learning approaches to improve interlinear glossed text (IGT) detection, offering a systematic way to label lines in linguistic documents within the BIO tagging scheme. Key features and heuristics are discussed for effective case analysis and IGT sequencing.

Choosing features - slide 1
01 / 5Choosing features
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Choosing features
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. Choosing features LING 572 Fei Xia Week 4: 1/27/2011

  2. A linguistic document Reconsidering structural case in Finnish Dieter Wunderlich This paper is a response to Kiparsky (2000), who convincingly argues that the complex case marking in Finnish can … ….. The genitive is also blocked in the imperative construction, shown in (1b), as well as in the passive…. (1) a. Tuo-n häne-t / karhu-n / karhu-t / karhu-j-a. bring-1 sg (s)he-ACC / bear-GEN / bear-pl.NOM / bear-pl-PART `I'll bring him/her / a/the bear/ the bears / bears' b. Tuohäne-t / karhu / karhu-t / karhu-j-a. bring (s)he-ACC / bear-NOM / bear-pl.NOM / bear-pl-PART `Bring him/her / a/the bear / the bears / bears!’ On the basis of the fact that bounded ….

  3. Cues in the document Reconsidering structural case in Finnish Dieter Wunderlich This paper is a response to Kiparsky (2000), who convincingly argues that the complex case marking in Finnish can … ….. The genitive is also blocked in the imperative construction, shown in (1b), as well as in the passive…. (1) a. Tuo-n häne-t / karhu-n / karhu-t / karhu-j-a. bring-1 sg(s)he-ACC / bear-GEN / bear-pl.NOM / bear-pl-PART `I'll bring him/her / a/the bear/ the bears / bears' b. Tuohäne-t / karhu / karhu-t / karhu-j-a. bring (s)he-ACC / bear-NOM / bear-pl.NOM / bear-pl-PART `Bring him/her / a/the bear / the bears / bears!’ On the basis of the fact that bounded ….

  4. Applying ML to IGT detection • Treat it as a sequence labeling problem. • Label each line in a document with one of the five tags: (an extension of the BIO scheme) • BL: a blank line • B: the 1st line in an IGT • I: inside an IGT that is not a BL • E: the last line in an IGT • O: outside IGT that is not a BL • Convert a tag sequence into IGT sequences by simple heuristics: • Ex: Any “B [I | BL]* E” sequence is treated as an IGT instance.

  5. Features • F1: the words that appear on the current line. • F2: 16 features that look at various cues: • Ex: whether the line contains an example number • F3: the tags of the previous two lines • F4: the same as F2 features, but checked against the neighboring lines • Ex: whether the next line contains an example number.