1. Teacher / Principal Evaluation Project North Thurston Public Schools Presented by Conni Van Hoose and Ryan Akiyama

2. NTPS Values • Trusting Work Culture • Respectful • Collaborative • Optimistic • Transparent • Accountable • Committed to Excellence: Providing every student the academic and life skills necessary to succeed in a diverse world.

3. Project Norms • Norms for Collaboration • Speak openly • Confidentiality • Let’s work toward better teaching and learning • Safety in the room • Agree on what to communicate out • Assume positive intentions • Titles don’t matter- treat each other as equals • Agree on what consensus is before making decisions

4. NTPS – NTEA Collaboration • Team Creation • Joint communication and selection process • Team Leadership • Project Director = Administrator • Project Facilitator = Teacher • Communication • Site visits to all schools • Raj Manhas – NTPS Superintendent • John Bash – NTPS Chief Operations Officer • Conni Van Hoose – NTEA President

5. NTPS TPEP Structure

6. Implications

7. Implications

8. NTPS Model Development • NTPS is one of nine pilot sites in the state: this is all in a “first draft” phase • Our model has been influenced by the work of Charlotte Danielson, Kim Marshall, and Robert Marzano as well as other evaluation systems currently in use • We value this work because… • The work itself instigates meaningful professional growth for all involved • We see the potential for this project to have a powerful effect on teaching and learning in this state for many years to come

9. NTPS Model Development

10. NTPS Process • Step 1: Decide on a Rating Scale • 6696 requires a 4 Tier system • We reviewed other 4 Tier evaluation and assessment models and agreed to the following… Level 4: Distinguished Level 3: Proficient / Effective Level 2: Emerging / Needs Improvement Level 1: Does Not Meet Expectations

11. NTPS Process • Step 2: Create and Sort Elements for Each Criteria • Each criteria assigned to a subcommittee and broken down into 5-9 elements (AKA sub-criteria or components) • Common language / Glossary • Duplication analysis • After revision we currently have 2-3 unique elements per criteria

12. NTPS Process • Step 3: Create the Performance Levels • Began by composing our summative statements for each performance level (AKA the 10,000 foot view) • Wrote Level 3 (Proficient/Effective) first • Completed the writing and revision process for our summative statement of performance level 3 before moving on to level 1,2,4 • Followed the same procedure to create the first draft of the rubric for our model

13. NTPS Process • Next Steps • Continue revision and development of the rubric for our model based on work with the Steering Committee/other Pilot sites • Investigate and select Evidence and Measures • Increase our engagement with Community and Parent stakeholders • Evaluator and Evaluatee selection / training

14. Contact Information Conni Van Hoose President NTEA 360.352.5220 cvanhoose@nthurston.k12.wa.us Ryan Akiyama NTPS TPEP Project Facilitator 360.352.5220 rakiyama@nthurston.k12.wa.us