Download
1 / 14
140 likes | 265 Vues
Explore the North Thurston Public Schools (NTPS) Teacher Evaluation Project led by Conni Van Hoose and Ryan Akiyama. This initiative embodies NTPS values such as trust, respect, collaboration, and commitment to excellence, ensuring every student acquires essential academic and life skills. The project adopts collaborative norms emphasizing open communication, confidentiality, and equality within teams. With a structured approach to evaluation, NTPS aims for meaningful professional growth, influencing teaching and learning for years. Engage with community stakeholders as we develop a comprehensive evaluation model.
E N D
Teacher / Principal Evaluation Project North Thurston Public Schools Presented by Conni Van Hoose and Ryan Akiyama
NTPS Values • Trusting Work Culture • Respectful • Collaborative • Optimistic • Transparent • Accountable • Committed to Excellence: Providing every student the academic and life skills necessary to succeed in a diverse world.
Project Norms • Norms for Collaboration • Speak openly • Confidentiality • Let’s work toward better teaching and learning • Safety in the room • Agree on what to communicate out • Assume positive intentions • Titles don’t matter- treat each other as equals • Agree on what consensus is before making decisions
NTPS – NTEA Collaboration • Team Creation • Joint communication and selection process • Team Leadership • Project Director = Administrator • Project Facilitator = Teacher • Communication • Site visits to all schools • Raj Manhas – NTPS Superintendent • John Bash – NTPS Chief Operations Officer • Conni Van Hoose – NTEA President
NTPS Model Development • NTPS is one of nine pilot sites in the state: this is all in a “first draft” phase • Our model has been influenced by the work of Charlotte Danielson, Kim Marshall, and Robert Marzano as well as other evaluation systems currently in use • We value this work because… • The work itself instigates meaningful professional growth for all involved • We see the potential for this project to have a powerful effect on teaching and learning in this state for many years to come
NTPS Process • Step 1: Decide on a Rating Scale • 6696 requires a 4 Tier system • We reviewed other 4 Tier evaluation and assessment models and agreed to the following… Level 4: Distinguished Level 3: Proficient / Effective Level 2: Emerging / Needs Improvement Level 1: Does Not Meet Expectations
NTPS Process • Step 2: Create and Sort Elements for Each Criteria • Each criteria assigned to a subcommittee and broken down into 5-9 elements (AKA sub-criteria or components) • Common language / Glossary • Duplication analysis • After revision we currently have 2-3 unique elements per criteria
NTPS Process • Step 3: Create the Performance Levels • Began by composing our summative statements for each performance level (AKA the 10,000 foot view) • Wrote Level 3 (Proficient/Effective) first • Completed the writing and revision process for our summative statement of performance level 3 before moving on to level 1,2,4 • Followed the same procedure to create the first draft of the rubric for our model
NTPS Process • Next Steps • Continue revision and development of the rubric for our model based on work with the Steering Committee/other Pilot sites • Investigate and select Evidence and Measures • Increase our engagement with Community and Parent stakeholders • Evaluator and Evaluatee selection / training
Contact Information Conni Van Hoose President NTEA 360.352.5220 cvanhoose@nthurston.k12.wa.us Ryan Akiyama NTPS TPEP Project Facilitator 360.352.5220 rakiyama@nthurston.k12.wa.us
