Balaji Prabhakar
Explore the history and development of internet routers from modified computers to specialized architectures. Learn about the challenges, breakthroughs, and the evolution of router technology over the years.
Balaji Prabhakar
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Spring 2011A history of big routers (slides from Nick McKeown’s EE 384X presentation) EE384M Network Algorithms Balaji Prabhakar
Outline What is an Internet router? • What limits performance: Memory access time The early days: Modified computers • Programmable against uncertainty The middle years: Specialized for performance • Needed new architectures, theory, and practice • So how did we do? • Simple model breaking down
Definitions 1 N 2 3 … R … 4 … 5 6 8 7 N = number of linecards. Typically 8-32 per chassis R = line-rate. 1Gb/s, 2.5Gb/s, 10Gb/s, 40Gb/s, 100Gb/s Capacity of router = N x R
What a Big Router Looks Like Cisco GSR 12816 Juniper T640 Capacity: 640Gb/sPower: 5kW Capacity: 320Gb/sPower: 3kW 19” 19” 6ft 3ft 2.5ft 2ft
What Multirack Routers Looks Like Cisco CRS-1 Juniper T1600 + TX Matrix
Lookup internet address Check and update checksum Check and update age
Barebones Router Router Control and Management
1 2 BottlenecksMemory, memory, …
Outline What is an Internet router? • What limits performance: Memory access time The early days: Modified computers • Programmable against uncertainty The middle years: Specialized for performance • Needed new architectures, theory, and practice • So how did we do? • Simple model breaking down
Bottlenecks Early days: Modified Computer Must run at rate N x R R R R R R R R R
R R R R 2nd Generation Router
Early days: Modified Computer Function more important than speed 1993 (WWW) changed everything We badly needed • Some new architecture • Some theory • Some higher performance
1 x R Arbiter
Arbiter Arbiter Arbiter Arbiter Arbiter Arbiter Arbiter Arbiter Arbiter
4th Generation RouterMultirack; optics inside Optical links 100s of metres Linecards Switch
More 4th Generation Routers Alcatel 7670 RSP Juniper TX TX Avici TSR Cisco CRS-1
Example of Theory There’s something special about “2”
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Permutation 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Case 1: Placing calls Crosspoint switch A crosspoint switch supports all permutations So it is “non-blocking” But it needs N2 crosspoints
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Case 1: Placing CallsUncertainty costs • If I give you the permutation, you can route it. • If I give you entries one at a time, you can’t. Clos (1950s): But if you make it run 2 times faster you can route calls one at a time.
Case 2: Mimicking N x R
Case 2: Mimicking 1 x R
NR R Are they equivalent? No.
1 x R ? x R Case 2: Mimicking Algorithm
NR R 2R Yes, if it runs 2 times faster. Algorithm Now are they equivalent?
Yes, if it runs 2 times faster. Case 3: Are they equivalent?
1 R Algorithm Case 4: Routing packets with uncertainty If you know the rates, you can find a sequence of permutations: Rates 1 0 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 = 0 0 1 0 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 But we don’t know the rates (they are always changing)
2 3 If you choose the permutations one at a time, and you can spend as long as you want choosing, then you can support any pattern of rates. But if you have to make decisions one at a time, then the switch has to run 2 times faster. Case 4: Routing packets with uncertainty
Case 5: Load-balancing Load-balancing to support all rate matrices: Requires the network to run 2 times faster E.g. the VL2 (Valiant Load balancing) architecture for Data Centers