1 / 46

Overview of 2014 Accountability TETN Videoconference

This videoconference provides an update on the Texas Performance Reporting System (TPRS) for the 2012-13 school year, including new performance indicators and disaggregated results for student groups.

tclancy
Télécharger la présentation

Overview of 2014 Accountability TETN Videoconference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overview of 2014 Accountability TETN Videoconference #30120| February 26, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting

  2. Reporting Update • New! The 2012-13 Texas Performance Reporting System (TPRS) provides: • Performance and participation results for additional student groups: • Economically Disadvantaged / Non-Economically Disadvantaged; • Male / Female; • Special Education / Non-Special Education; • At Risk / Non-At Risk; and • Migrant  / Non-Migrant.  • Disaggregated performance results for English Language Learners (ELL) and Career and Technical Education (CTE) student groups. • Indicators not previously reported on TAPR, such as College-Ready Graduates performance in either by subject (ELA or Math), AP/IB Results by subject area, and SAT/ACT by subject area. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  3. Reporting Update http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/tprs/2013/index.html Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  4. Accountability Goals • Texas will be among the top 10 states in postsecondary readiness by 2020, by: • Improving student achievement at all levels in the core subjects of the state curriculum.* • Ensuring the progress of all students toward achieving Advanced Academic Performance.* • Closing Advanced Academic Performance level gaps among groups.* • Rewarding excellence based on other indicators in addition to state assessment results. • * These goals are specified in Chapter 39.053(f) of the Texas Education Code. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  5. Accountability Development Timeline Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  6. Accountability Development Timeline Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  7. Student Achievement Index I Performance Index Framework Accountability System Student Progress Index 2 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad set of measures that provide a comprehensive evaluation of the campus or district. Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  8. Index 1: Student Achievement Index 1: Student Achievement provides an overview of student performance based on satisfactory student achievement across all subjects for all students. • Combined over All Subjects: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies. • Student Group: All Students. • Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II (Satisfactory). Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  9. Index 1: Student Achievement Index 1: ConstructionSince Index 1 has only one indicator, the Total Index Points and Index Score are the same: Index Score = Total Index Points. Total Index Points is the percentage of assessments that meet the Phase-in 1 Level II Standard. Each percent of students meeting the Phase-in 1 Level II performance standard contributes one point to the index. Index scores range from 0 to 100 for all campuses and districts. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  10. Index 1: Student Achievement Index 1: 2013 vs. 2014 Comparison • 2013 • Combined over All Subjects: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies. • Student Groups: All Students. • Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II (Satisfactory). • STAAR End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments (15 total): • English l – Reading; English ll – Reading; English lll – Reading • English l – Writing; English ll – Writing; English lll – Writing • Algebra l; Geometry; Algebra ll • Biology; Chemistry; Physics • World Geography; World History; US History • English Language Learners (English and Spanish tests): • Students in US schools Year 1 - Year 3 excluded • Students in US schools Year 4 and beyond included • Proposed 2014 • Combined over All Subjects: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies. • Student Groups: All Students. • Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II (Satisfactory). • English Language Learners (English and Spanish tests): • Students in US schools Year 1 excluded • STAAR EOC Assessments (5 total): • English l (combined tests); English ll (combined tests) beginning in spring 2014 • Algebra l • Biology • US History • Students in US schools Year 2 and beyond included • ELL Progress Measure included for those tested in English Shaded areas are new for 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  11. Index 2: Student Progress Index 2: Student Progress focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students with disabilities, and English language learners. • By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, and Writing (for available grades). • Points based on weighted performance: • One point given for each percentage of tests at the Met progress level. • Two points given for each percentage of tests at the Exceeded progresslevel. • Additional progress measures in 2014: STAAR-M, STAAR-Alt, and ELL. • Additional progress measures in 2014: STAAR-M, STAAR-Alt, and English Language Learners (ELL). Shaded areas are new for 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  12. Index 2: Student Progress • Progress Measures by Subject Area and School Type Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  13. Index 2: Student Progress Index 2: 2013 Construction – Table 1 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  14. Index 2: Student Progress Index 2: 2013 Construction – Table 2 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  15. Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps 15 Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps emphasizes advanced academic achievement of economically disadvantaged students and the two lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups. • Proposed 2014 • Student Groups: • Economically Disadvantaged • Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity: • Pointsbased on STAAR performance: • Phase-in 1 Level II satisfactory performance: One point for each percent of tests at the Phase-in 1 Level II satisfactory performance standard. • Level III advanced performance:Two points for each percent of tests at the Level III advanced performance standard. • By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies. • 2013 • Student Groups: • Economically Disadvantaged • Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity: The two lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups on the campus or within the district, based on 2012 assessment results. • Pointsbased on STAAR performance: • Phase-in 1 Level II satisfactory performance: One point for each percent of tests at the Phase-in 1 Level II satisfactory performance standard. • By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies. • Select the two lowest performing student groups if both the prior year reading and mathematics subject area test results each have at least 25 tests. • Level III advanced performance:Two points for each percent of tests at the Level III advanced performance standard. Shaded areas are new for 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  16. Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Index 3: 2014 Construction - Student Groups(based on 2013 assessment results by Race/Ethnicity) Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  17. Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Index 3: 2014 Construction – Table 1 (based on 2014 STAAR performance) Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  18. Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Index 3: 2014 Construction – Table 2(based on 2014 assessment results by subject area) Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  19. Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the importance of earning a high school diploma that provides students with the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military; and the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing students for high school. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  20. Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: 2013 vs. 2014 2013 • Graduation Score: Combined performance across the graduation and dropout rates for: • Grade 9-12 Four-Year Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups; or • Grade 9-12 Five-Year Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups, whichever contributes the higher number of points to the index. • RHSP/DAP Annual Graduates: All Students and race/ethnicity student groups. 2014 • Graduation Score: Combined performance across the graduation and dropout rates for: • Grade 9-12 Four-Year Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups; or • Grade 9-12 Five-Year Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups, whichever contributes the higher number of points to the index. • RHSP/DAP Graduates Based on Longitudinal Cohort: All Students and race/ethnicity student groups. • STAAR Score: STAAR Percent Met Final Level ll on one or more tests for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups. Additional Indicators Required by House Bill 5 (83rd Texas Legislature, 2013) • Texas Success Initiative college readiness benchmarks. • Number of students who earn postsecondary credit required for a foundation high school program, an associate’s degree, or an industry certification. • STAAR Score: STAAR Percent Met Final Level ll on one or more tests for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups. Additional Indicators Required by House Bill 5 (83rd Texas Legislature, 2013) • Texas Success Initiative college readiness benchmarks. • Number of students who earn postsecondary credit required for a foundation high school program, an associate’s degree, or an industry certification. Shaded areas are new for 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  21. Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  22. Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: AEA Campuses and Charters 2013 Proposed 2014 • 4-, 5-, and 6-year Graduation and General Education Development (GED) Score; • If no Graduation and GED Rates, useGrade 9-12 Annual Dropout Rate: Points given for annual dropout rates lower than 20.0 • 2013 AEA Registration Criterion • 4-, 5-, and 6-year Graduation, Continuing Students, and GED Score; • If no Graduation, Continuing, and GED Rates, useGrade 9-12 Annual Dropout Rate: Points given for rates lower than 20.0 • STAAR Score: STAAR Percent Met Final Level ll on one or more tests Contrib. to Points 75% 25% Continuing Students, STAAR Score: STAAR Percent Met Final Level ll on one or more tests • Expand AEA Registration to include Dropout Recovery centers Expand AEA Registration to include dropout recovery schools Shaded areas are new for 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  23. Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: AEA Campuses and Charters Bonus Points 2013 Proposed 2014 • Bonus Points: • RHSP/DAP Rate: All Students. • Excluded Students Count: All Students. • Postsecondary/College-Ready Graduates Indicator • Bonus Points: • RHSP/DAP Rate: All Students. • Continuing Students Success Rate: All Students. • Excluded Students Count: All Students. Shaded areas are new for 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  24. 2014 Accountability Rating Labels Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  25. 2013 and 2014 Index Targets for Non-AEA Campuses and Districts To receive a Met Standard rating, non-AEA campuses and districts met the following accountability targets on all indexes for which they had performance data in 2013. 2014 Index targets will be based on recommendations from accountability advisory groups and finalized by the commissioner in spring 2014. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  26. 2013 and 2014 Index Targets for AEA Campuses and Charters To receive a Met Alternative Standard rating, AEA campuses and charters met the following accountability targets on all indexes for which they had performance data in 2013. 2014 Index targets will be based on recommendations from accountability advisory groups and finalized by the commissioner in spring 2014. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  27. 2014 AEA Campus Registration • 2014 AEA campus registration is tentatively scheduled for April 16-25, 2014, and available through the TEASE Accountability website. • Alternative education campuses (AECs) rated under 2013 AEA procedures qualify for automatic re-registration in 2014, subject to certain criteria: • Each campus must have at least 75% at-risk student enrollment, as verified by current-year PEIMS fall enrollment data; • For campuses with less than 75% at-risk student enrollment, prior-year PEIMS data may be used to qualify; • Each campus must have at least 50% of students enrolled in grades 6-12. • AEA registration will be expanded to include dropout recovery schools. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  28. 2014 AEA Campus Registration • AEA registration and rescission forms submitted via TEASE Accountability serve as official documentation and must be printed and maintained locally. . Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  29. Distinction Designations • 2014 Distinction Designations • Student Progress (based on Index 2) • Closing Performance Gaps (based on Index 3) • Academic Achievement in: • Reading/English Language Arts • Mathematics • Science • Social Studies • Postsecondary Readiness for campuses and districts • 2013 Distinction Designations • Student Progress (based on Index 2) • Academic Achievement in: • Reading/English Language Arts • Mathematics Shaded areas are new for 2014 Per Texas Education Code (TEC) §39.201, alternative education campuses (AECs) evaluated under AEA provisions are not eligible for distinction designations. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  30. Distinction Designations • Districts and Campuses Postsecondary Readiness:House Bill 5 (83rd Texas Legislature, 2013) expanded distinction designations to both districts and campuses for outstanding performance in attainment of postsecondary readiness. • Criteria must include indicators based on percentages of students who: • Achieve college-readiness standards on STAAR; • Earn nationally or internationally recognized business/industry certification; • Complete a coherent sequence of CTE courses; • Complete dual credit courses or a postsecondary course for local credit; • Achieve college readiness standards on SAT, ACT, PSAT, or ACT-PLAN examinations; and • Earn college credit based on AP/IB performance. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  31. Pending Topics for 2014 Accountability Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  32. Pending Topics for 2014 Accountability Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  33. Pending Topics for 2014 Accountability Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  34. Pending Topics for 2014 Accountability Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  35. Pending Topics for 2014 Accountability Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  36. Pending Topics for 2014 Accountability Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  37. Pending Topics for 2014 Accountability Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  38. Pending Topics for 2014 Accountability Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  39. Legislative Changes - 83rd Texas Legislature • Dropout Recovery • Beginning with the 2013-14 school year, TEA will evaluate dropout recovery schools, which are defined as: • serves students in grades 9-12; • has enrollment of which at least 50 percent of the students are 17 years of age or older as of September 1 of the school year; and • meets the eligibility requirements for and is registered under alternative education accountability procedures adopted by the commissioner. • Accountability Ratings • Beginning with the 2016-17 school year, TEA is required to assign ratings of A, B, C, D, or F to districts, and ratings of exemplary, recognized, acceptable, or unacceptable to campuses. • Community and Student Engagement • Beginning with the 2013-14 school year, districts will be required to evaluate community and student engagement for the district and each of their campuses and assign a rating. The ratings are required to be reported to TEA by August 8, 2014. • Districts will be required to assign a performance rating of exemplary, recognized, acceptable, or unacceptable based on locally determined criteria. These performance ratings must be based on criteria developed by a local committee. The agency is not permitted to determine the criteria that can be used for these evaluations. • For the 2013-14 school year, TEA will collect the locally-determined ratings in the summer 2014 PEIMS Submission 3 for the district and each campus in the district. TEA will report these ratings publicly by October 1, 2014. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  40. System Safeguards Safeguard Measures and Targets: • Reporting system disaggregates performance by student group, performance level, and subject area. • Performance rates arecalculatedfrom the assessment results used to calculate Index 1: Student Achievement. • 2013 targets for the disaggregated system-safeguard results: • STAAR performance target corresponds to Index 1 (50%); • STAAR participation target required by federal accountability(95%); • Federal graduation rate targets and improvement calculations for 4-year rate (78%) and 5-year rate (83%); and • Federal limit on use of alternate assessments (1% and 2%). Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  41. 2013 Accountability System Safeguard Measures and Targets * Targets for 2013 correspond to the performance target for Index 1: Student Achievement. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  42. 2014 Accountability System Safeguard Measures and Targets * Targets for 2014 correspond to the performance target for Index 1: Student Achievement. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  43. System Safeguards • Results will be reported for any groupthat meets accountability minimum size criteria. • Failure to meet the safeguard target for any reported groupmust be addressed in the campus or district improvement plan. • Performance on the safeguard measures will be incorporated into the Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS). • See Accountability Monitoring website for further information: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/pmi/accountabilitymonitoring/ Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  44. Overview of Federal Accountability • On September 30, 2013, the U.S. Department of Education approved the Texas request to waive specific provisions of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). • The Texas accountability System Safeguard information was used to meet federal accountability requirements to identify Priority and Focus Schools. • Federal accountability requirements are limited to the reading/English language arts and mathematics performance and participation indicators. • Other federal requirements require reading/English language arts and mathematics performance and participation system safeguard information. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  45. Overview of Federal Accountability • Note that performance information must be reported at the 2012-13 federally approved target of 75% for the following: • Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs), using only the ELL performance and participation information; and, • USDE Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) State Performance Plan (SPP) and State Annual Performance Report (APR) that measure the students served by special education programs. • Resources: • 2013 Accountability Manual: Chapter 10 - Federal Accountability and Appendix K - System Safeguards and Federal Accountability Requirements • http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/manual/index.html Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

  46. Resources • 2014 Accountability Developmenthttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2014/index.html • 2013 Accountability Rating Systemhttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/index.html • Performance Reporting Home Pagehttp://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport • Performance Reporting E-mailperformance.reporting@tea.state.tx.us • Division of Performance Reporting Telephone (512) 463-9704 Thank you! Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

More Related