1 / 11

MID TERM REVIEW MEETING RESA PROJECT

MID TERM REVIEW MEETING RESA PROJECT. SLOT ANALYSIS: PHASE I 2 nd APRIL 2009. Deepak Saxena & Amarjeet Singh CUTS CART. PRESENTATION OUTLINE. RESA PROJECT: RAJASTHAN PROJECT COVERAGE PROGRESS SO FAR SOME HIGHLIGHTS LIMITATIONS OPPORTUNITIES THREATS STRENGTHS. RESA PROJECT: RAJASTHAN.

tdevlin
Télécharger la présentation

MID TERM REVIEW MEETING RESA PROJECT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MID TERM REVIEW MEETINGRESA PROJECT SLOT ANALYSIS: PHASE I 2nd APRIL 2009 Deepak Saxena & Amarjeet Singh CUTS CART

  2. PRESENTATION OUTLINE • RESA PROJECT: RAJASTHAN • PROJECT COVERAGE • PROGRESS SO FAR • SOME HIGHLIGHTS • LIMITATIONS • OPPORTUNITIES • THREATS • STRENGTHS

  3. RESA PROJECT: RAJASTHAN Districts: 10 Local Partners: • Upbhokta Sanrankshan Samiti, Bikaner , • Vagad Vikas Sansthan, Banswara • CHD, Chittorgarh • Samajik Vikas Sansthan, Dholpur • Arawali Sewa Samiti, Sirohi • Manav Pragati Sansthan, Churu • Saarthi Sansthan, Jhunjhunu • Maruti Sewa Samiti, Udaipur • Consumer Legal Help Society, Sawai Madhopur • Oxford Shikshan Parshikshan Vikas Sansthan, Kota

  4. PROJECT COVERAGE

  5. PROGRESS SO FAR • Perception Survey of the partner CSOs • The Local Inception Workshop • Consumer Base Line Survey • Territorial Base paper and Territorial Training Manual • Reference Group Meeting- I • Two Territorial Trainings • Hand-Out in vernacular • Grassroots Interface Meetings

  6. HIGHLIGHTS • Planned 5 GIMs : Conducted 48 • Target beneficiary in GIMs -500 : Actual 1859 • Other project partners attended first 2 GIMs to learn from Rajasthan experience • CUTS received ‘India Power Award’ for its grassroots community impact • One partner awarded by the District Collector

  7. LIMITATIONS • Some delay due to dependence on local partners • Few Local partners lack of experience of dealing technical issues • Some local partners finding little difficult to reach to local utilities

  8. OPPORTUNITIES • Indication of RERC to be further involved • Demand from Local CSOs to undertake activities • Establishment of a consumer cell at local level • Enabling environment to ensure success of project’s future activities and paving way for its replication • More consumer representation in regulatory process • More consumer friendly regulations and decisions

  9. THREATS • Few of the local partners are developing an unfriendly relation with the utilities • Some of partners focusing only on quantitative output rather than qualitative • Participants focusing on their personal problems and directly initiating discussions with utility officials in GIMs. • Slackness and callous approach of few of the partners

  10. STRENGTHS • Rich experience of working in the sector over a decade • Strong networking all over the state/districts • Established contacts with utilities, regulators., local legislators, media, etc • Active involvement of the RG Members • Capable and experienced team members • Continuous support from implementing organisation • Good infrastructural facilities • Active support of Local CSOs, media, etc

  11. Thank youcart@cuts.orgds@cuts.orgas7@cuts.org

More Related