1 / 17

Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator

Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs. The factors within the control of districts and schools that have the most significant impact on student learning is….

teague
Télécharger la présentation

Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs

  2. The factors within the control of districts and schools that have the most significant impact on student learning is… • Well-designed curriculum, assessments and instructional materials aligned to standards • High-quality instructional practice • Strong school leadership -Tony Wagner, Change Leadership Group – Harvard Graduate School of Education

  3. ESEA Flexibility Principle 1 College and Career Ready Expectations for All Students Principle 2 State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Principle 3 Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership

  4. Old Adequate Yearly Progress Annual Measurable Objectives (Proficiency Rates) Attendance/ Graduation Rates Participation Rates

  5. A Balanced Way of Examining Data

  6. School Classifications along The West Virginia Accountability Index 100% Effective Schools

  7. Differentiated Recognition, Accountability & Support All Schools 2G Reward Schools: 2C Other Title I Schools 2F Focus Largest Gaps 2E Priority lowest achieving 2D

  8. KEY IMPLICATIONS • Shift from large number of schools annually NOT making AYP to reduced number with ongoing targeted support • Redirecting federal funding to support school improvement • Stronger focus on LEAs responsibility for school improvement • Shift from “compliance-driven” to “outcome focused technical assistance”

  9. 2.C Reward Schools – Meaningful recognition and rewards • Both High Achieving and High Progress • Proposed recognition: • Public recognition • Special professional development opportunities • Representation on state-level stakeholder committees Reward Schools

  10. 2.D Priority Schools – Required to Identify a minimum of 18 Low Performing schools: • ESEA funding flexibility • 3 year school improvement process • Research based state models (high quality standards, diagnostics, leadership team support) Priority lowest achieving Federal Programs Resources and Suggestions: SPL Implementation/Training  Next Generation Standards PD Training  Common Core Resources PD Training  TLI  Extended Day Activities – Title I Transition Activities  Parent Involvement – Title IPLC/s/Collaborative Teams – Title I, Title II Academic Coaches – Title I  Administrative Coaches - Title I  Parent Involvement – Title I

  11. 2.E Focus Schools – Required to Identify a minimum of 36 High GAP (struggling subgroups) schools: • School self-assessment/diagnostic • Revise strategic plan • ESEA funding flexibility • RESA TA teams focused on addressing GAPs Focus Largest Gaps Federal Programs Resources and Suggestions: SPL Implementation/Training  Next Generation Standards PD Training  Common Core Resources PD Training  TLI  Extended Day Activities – Title ITransition Activities – Title I  Parent Involvement – Title IPLC/s/Collaborative Teams – Title I, Title II Strategic Plan Revision Title I Technical Assistance

  12. 2.F Other Struggling Title I Schools No requirement to identify specific number: • Alignment of School/District Strategic Plans & funding resources to address low-performance • Availability of technical assistance from SEA, Regional and LEA levels Federal Programs Resources and Suggestions: SPL Implementation/Training  Next Generation Standards PD Training  Common Core Resources PD Training  TLI  Extended Day Activities – Title ITransition Activities – Title I  Parent Involvement – Title IPLC/s/Collaborative Teams – Title I, Title II Strategic Plan Revision Title I Technical Assistance Other Title I Schools

  13. 2.G Build SEA, LEA & School Capacity to Improve Student Learning in ALL schools ALL Schools • Coordinated approach to Principles 1, 2, 3 • Systemic capacity building Federal Programs Resources and Suggestions: Extended Day Activities – Title I Parent Involvement – Title I Strategic Plan Revision SEA Technical Assistance Academic Coach – Title IAdministrative Coach- Title I

  14. Improve Teacher Quality Principle 3 School Based Leadership Principle 2 Support for Personalized Learning Expected Behaviors Student Achievement Principle 2 Increase Parent & Community Involvement Principle 2 College & Career Ready Standards Principle 1 Please note: This is not an official WVDE representation of the Flexibility Waiver.

  15. Thank You Questions? Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs rsaxe@access.k12.wv.us

More Related