1 / 12

Object-Oriented Design and Implementation of Fault Management Function for MPLS network

Object-Oriented Design and Implementation of Fault Management Function for MPLS network. Sung-Jin Lim , Ryung-Min Kim, and Young-Tak Kim Advanced Networking Technology Lab. Dept. of Information & Communication Engineering Graduate School Yeungnam University, Korea

ted
Télécharger la présentation

Object-Oriented Design and Implementation of Fault Management Function for MPLS network

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Object-Oriented Design and Implementation of Fault Management Function for MPLS network Sung-Jin Lim , Ryung-Min Kim, and Young-Tak Kim Advanced Networking Technology Lab. Dept. of Information & Communication Engineering Graduate School Yeungnam University, Korea Email: genie@yumail.ac.kr, degger@nownuri.net, ytkim@yu.ac.kr http://antl. yu.ac.kr

  2. Introduction • Traffic engineering has been emphasized to offer end-to-end QoS-guaranteed multimedia services in Next Generation Internet. • Fault restoration in traditional IP network vs. MPLS network • The primary goals of fast restoration by fault management function. • QoS guaranteed differentiated path protection. • Guaranteed bandwidth of backup LSP at fault occurrence. • We propose a fault management with fast rerouting restoration scheme in MPLS network. • Design and implement differentiated path protection and link. preemption priority among LSPs. • Key technologies • Traffic Engineering, Differentiated Service, Restoration, Protection, and Object-Oriented Design.

  3. Related works • Fault restoration model • Rerouting vs. protection switching • Rerouting • Protection switching : • Pre-established backup path SRLG-disjoint with working LSP • 1:1, 1:N, M:N, 1+1 path protection switching • Local repair vs. path protection (A) Link protection (B) Node protection (C) Path protection Figure 1. Protection switching model

  4. Related works (cont.) • Fault Management Architecture of Next Generation Internet • Fault Management Components in TINA • Fault Management MOs in TMN • Fault Management Activities • Alarm surveillance • Testing • Fault localization • Fault correction • Trouble administration • MPLS Fault Management System • RATES, • Cisco MPLS Tunnel Builder, • Sheer Networks’ Broadband Operating Supervisor(BOS)

  5. Restoration Schemes • Differentiated Path Protection Option • Example scenario of applying protection path options according to MPLS service class. • Preemption Priority based restoration of LSPs • Guaranteed bandwidth of backup LSP for the protected working LSP. Table 1. Differentiated Path Protection scheme

  6. Design and Implementation of Fault Management System • Fault restoration procedure with Managed Objects (MOs) Figure 2. Fault Restoration on MOs

  7. Design and Implementation of Fault Management System (cont.) • Fault Restoration Function • SNMP trap handler implementation • Alarm Manager GUI Figure 3. Event Log GUI Figure 4. Alarm Log GUI

  8. Design and Implementation of Fault Management System (cont.) • Design and Implementation of NMS Core Figure 5. MO Classes of MPLS LSP Fault Management Figure 6. MO Classes of link/node Fault Management

  9. Performance Analysis of Fast Restoration • Test Network Configuration • Three core routers LER_E, LER_ F, and LER_G • Four CE router CE_A, CE_ B, CE_ C, and CE_ D • Two link types • POS (Packet Over SONET ) with 155Mbps – Solid line • Serial with 2Mbps – Dashed line Figure 7. Test network configuration

  10. End-to-end Performance Comparisons of Differentiated Protection Options(1) • End-to-end Performance Comparisons of Differentiated Protection Options Figure 8. Fast-reroute by NMS Figure 9. M:N fast-reroute by NMS Figure 11. Path-Option mode by Cisco Figure 10. Standby mode by Cisco Figure 12. Link-Protection by Cisco

  11. End-to-end Performance Comparison by Differentiated Protection Options • Differentiated Restoration performance by precedence Table 2. Priority and bandwidth between LSPs Figure 13. Same priority Figure 14. Different priority

  12. Conclusion • We proposed an object-oriented design and implementation scheme for • 1:1, 1:N, M:N fast-reroute by NMS • Standby mode, Path-option and link/node protection scheme in Cisco MPLS Routers. • The Proposed Fault Management Scheme for MPLS Network Provides • Reliability that guarantee the required bandwidth of backup LSP after fault restoration • Differentiated protection path option • Object-Oriented MO design and implementation of network nodes and links for better expansibility with equipments form various vendors.

More Related