1 / 15

Budget Road Map December 2009

Budget Road Map December 2009. Approach How much state reduction and how soon? How much of that amount can be mitigated with revenue growth and how soon? Difference is what we need to approach via expense reductions. Current Multiyear Fiscal Planning Scenario. “Old Plan”.

tekla
Télécharger la présentation

Budget Road Map December 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Budget Road Map December 2009

  2. Approach • How much state reduction and how soon? • How much of that amount can be mitigated with revenue growth and how soon? • Difference is what we need to approach via expense reductions.

  3. Current Multiyear Fiscal Planning Scenario “Old Plan”

  4. Current Multiyear Fiscal Planning Scenario “Good”

  5. Current Multiyear Fiscal Planning Scenario “Not So Good”

  6. Avoid this situation:“Not So Good” Outcome w/out Preparation –Severe, Rapid Expense Reduction • We would need to adapt to the negative situation in which we would find ourselves – being unsatisfied with unpalatable choices (even historically unacceptable choices) would not excuse a lack of action • Many of the choices we would need to consider to emerge financially viable from such a fiscal crisis might, in a variety of ways, be harmful to parts of our university community – but our primary responsibility would be to emerge with a financially viable university that maintained as much quality as possible in our academic programs

  7. Assumptions – Mission/Vision:under any circumstances, what guides us? • As a Land Grant University committed to public access,we need to try to keep tuition increases limited (affordability) • As a Land Grant University, we need to maintain quality and excellence so that we are offering access to some of the best education available in the world • The two above assumptions will conflict and we will need tobalance them

  8. Assumptions – Fiscal • FY11 • 9% Tuition increase for resident undergraduates will be available to us in FY11 • Our non-resident undergraduate tuition is near the top of the market but VPEA should advise us on setting this rate • Graduate tuition has minimal fiscal impact and recommendations should be formulated by VPGA • FY12 • If there are additional declines in state support, there will be a loosening of tuition controls • Affordability Paradox • Access to Quality Balance

  9. Fiscal Assumption Implications:Revenue Growth • Enrollment incentives for FY11 • Options for major changes in tuition approach for FY12 • By program • Credit hour gap closure to 12 • “simplification” • Linked to enrollment incentives • Affordability Paradox • Access to Quality Balance

  10. Fiscal Assumption Implications:Expense Reduction • Salary reduction? • Furlough? • Suspend employer retirement contribution? • Cuts • Level needed?

  11. Tentative Approach • Target $10M FY11 cut while holding mandatory coststo a bare minimum • Positions well for Governor’s model or worse;adequate for more negative models • November 31 report from Committees on enrollment incentives and FY12 tuition options • Categorization of Recommendations • Model for implementation • Hold for future reference • Not supported • P&B Hearings – January (post-December state revenue forecast)

More Related