20 likes | 152 Vues
To make the portal more attractive to users, we propose several enhancements: first, the implementation of gridding facilities like isoplots to visualize abundance and density data, as presence data alone may not suffice for addressing ecological inquiries. Second, we will create options for filtering data by spatial location (latitude, longitude, depth), temporal aspects, taxonomic categories, and additional attributes such as endangered status and ecological characteristics. User feedback options, web access statistics, and features like "dataset of the month" will also be added to engage users.
E N D
1. make portal more attractive to users a. provide gridding facilities/isoplotse.g. for abundance/densities (presence data is nice but not useful enough for ecological questions (as mentioned by hydrography group) b. create possibility to filter data (pre-catalogue): i. available: spatial (Lat Lot depth) ii. available: temporal iii. available: by taxon iv. to be added: density/abundance v. to be added: by attribute such as red listed/endangered, invasive, commercially exploited, edible, poisonous, long lived/short lived, benthic/pelagic, coastal/oceanic, intertidal… vi. to be added: only if other data is available (such as hydrography data from the same station or cruise) vii. to be added: by quality flag c. add possibility for user feedback, display web access statistics, promote “dataset of the month”, most popular queries… 13th MODEG meeting, 08.06.11: Biologysubgroup
2. link different thematic portals • 3. how to ensure continuity on the fringes of the area in question • specifically important for ecology • how do they feed into the European atlas of the sea? • common catalogue number required ? 13th MODEG meeting, 08.06.11: Biologysubgroup