1 / 22

PN Monitoring Mallorca, October 2006

PN Monitoring Mallorca, October 2006. Hot Pixels. FF 50-Iteration Offset Introduction. Noisy Pixels. Noisy Pixels. Rev 156 Impact. Noisy Pixels and Telemetry Load. Fraction of counts due to Noisy Pixels Per Quadrant. Noisy Pixels and Telemetry Load. CCD 11 Column 63.

teressam
Télécharger la présentation

PN Monitoring Mallorca, October 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PN Monitoring Mallorca, October 2006 Michael Smith, ESAC

  2. Hot Pixels Michael Smith, ESAC

  3. FF 50-Iteration Offset Introduction Noisy Pixels Michael Smith, ESAC

  4. Noisy Pixels Michael Smith, ESAC

  5. Rev 156 Impact Noisy Pixels and Telemetry Load Fraction of counts due to Noisy Pixels Per Quadrant Michael Smith, ESAC

  6. Noisy Pixels and Telemetry Load CCD 11 Column 63 Fraction of counts due to Noisy Pixels Per CCD of Quadrant 3 Should we blank CCD 11 Column 63 (at least partially)??? Michael Smith, ESAC

  7. Hot + Noisy Pixels: Effects on Data Reduction Some very hot pixels are not flagged by standard use of epproc/ epchain: • epproc/epchain call badpixfind with default high energy threshold of 12 keV (parameter hienergythresh=12) Combination of noisy and very hot pixels (E > 12 keV) results in problems with flare screening GTI creation (at least when following the EPIC analysis threads): • b/g rate curve selection expression: #XMMEA_EP && (PATTERN==0) && (PI>10000) • so very hot pixels are “missed”, and if these happen to be noisy… Michael Smith, ESAC

  8. Hot + Noisy Pixels: Effects on Data Reduction Background Rate Curve for Flare Screening Michael Smith, ESAC

  9. Hot + Noisy Pixels: Effects on Data Reduction Hot & Noisy Pixel in CCD 11 Column 63 Offset Trend Frequency Trend Michael Smith, ESAC

  10. >10 keV and 10-12 keV rates are highly correlated Hot + Noisy Pixels: Effects on Data Reduction For flare screening the solution could be to create the b/g curve in 10 - 12 keV band: #XMMEA_EP && (PATTERN==0) && (PI>10000) && (PI<12000) with a suitably adapted threshold (0.4 counts/s) This is an incomplete solution: The bad pixels remain in the calibrated events file! Michael Smith, ESAC

  11. Offset Median Michael Smith, ESAC

  12. Eclipse Season Boundaries First Observations per Revolution Offset Variance Michael Smith, ESAC

  13. Offset Maps Normal Variance Excessive Variance Michael Smith, ESAC

  14. Mean Row Offset vs RAWY Normal Variance Michael Smith, ESAC

  15. Mean Row Offset vs RAWY Excessive Q0 & Q2 Variance Michael Smith, ESAC

  16. Mean Row Offset vs RAWY Excessive Q1 & Q3 Variance Michael Smith, ESAC

  17. CalClosed Line Widths vs Offset Map Variance Quadrant 0 Quadrant 1 Michael Smith, ESAC

  18. Energy Scale vs Time very good, esp. for FF mode. Slight over-correction for EFF mode. SW mode under-correction, esp. at Mn (Result of SAS 6.5 Processing) Michael Smith, ESAC M. Kirsch

  19. Line width trend is stable ~0.5 ADU/year increase at Mn (Result of SAS 6.5 Processing) Michael Smith, ESAC M. Kirsch

  20. MOS Monitoring Mallorca, October 2006 Michael Smith, ESAC

  21. MOS1 Bad Pixels MOS2 Michael Smith, ESAC

  22. Michael Smith, ESAC

More Related