1 / 12

Healthy Kids

Healthy Kids. Title V & Medicaid partnering to improve EPSDT in Nevada. Healthy Kids (EPSDT) Status. Weak levels of partnering across state agencies; low level of screening High number of FQHC in Nevada Due to frontier status; number of providers to residents

terra
Télécharger la présentation

Healthy Kids

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Healthy Kids Title V & Medicaid partnering to improve EPSDT in Nevada

  2. Healthy Kids (EPSDT) Status • Weak levels of partnering across state agencies; low level of screening • High number of FQHC in Nevada • Due to frontier status; number of providers to residents • Lack of awareness when “green form” went away due to HIPAA initiation

  3. Getting Started • Low numbers of screens and need identified by Medicaid and Title V agency • HRSA technical assistance- Sept. 2006 • Raise awareness; 26 topics identified as in need of change • Improve communication across agencies • Improve communication to families • Improve communication to community organizations • Workgroups met to address priorities (2007)

  4. Workgroups formed Workgroups formed during the September Leadership Workshop (facilitated by K. Johnson & J. Resnick) • Tribal/FQHC/Co/MCO • Parent Support & Education • Auto Newborn • Cross-Linkages The groups’ progress is reported to the Maternal and Child Health Advisory Board (Title V)

  5. Tribal/FQHC/County/MCO • Proposed activities: provider capacity, outreach to low-income children, MCO network; adequacy of payment for screens; Addressed: • Communication among these entities- typically did not cross paths prior to these meetings • Provider training/awareness; billing training • Work on subcontracts to be in MCO network • Work with Parent group for creative outreach

  6. Parent Support & Education • Proposed activities: support parents in their role through education, motivation and knowledge of how to use the health care system; culturally appropriate materials Addressed: • Family developed brochure • Grass-root notification to parents • Review of letters sent by state system upon enrollment

  7. Auto Newborn • Proposed activities: Review federal requirements and Nevada’s policy, streamline enrollment notification and reduce time since birth to receive screens; support for electronic birth certificate capacity Addressed: • Medicaid corrected computer system to allow earlier reception of screens • Electronic Birth Certificates passed legislation • Improve education to pregnant women for early enrollment process

  8. Cross-Linkages • Proposed activities: Review effective data sharing, policy, and communication across agencies such as EIS, Child Welfare, Mental Health, Head Start Addressed: (this group did not meet formally, decided for staff to work within own positions and pull together administration of each division to resolve) • Ongoing activity for improved data sharing • Notification of who to contact for specialty screening • Education about Immunization as component of Healthy Kids screen (tie to existing priorities)

  9. Overall Challenges • Maintaining focus on specific issues to resolve; multiple areas in need of addressing • Inadequate service infrastructure to build upon • Low level of participation by state agency determining eligibility (in NV, not by Medicaid) • Lack of data; sharing of data; timely enrollment notification • Some issues too loaded to address in a public meeting forum

  10. Overall Successes • Improved communication/awareness • Strong MCO involvement in workgroups; new contract had incentives • Revival of welfare notification to families of newly enrolled children (procedure had been skipped-staff turnover) • Networking of state agencies with community-based organizations • Website – www.health.nv.gov matrix modeled after Michigan’s “EPSDT toolkit” • More providers understand the components of the screen; more billing staff code properly

  11. Future Activities • Formal process to inform parents (Iowa model) • Continued monitoring of systematic notification process via welfare mailers and eligibility worker staff training • More effective data sharing agreements • Monitoring/training of coding • Return of the screening form for providers (improves consistency of screen; billing notification; data recording)

  12. Q & A Judith Wright Chief, Bureau of Family Health Services, Nevada State Health Division jwright@health.nv.gov 775-684-4285

More Related